N※N

Show Politics and Government Publications

Trump administration opens investigation into Harvard''s visa program eligibility | CNN Politics

Harvard Launches Formal Investigation into Trump's Post-Presidency Financial Dealings

In a move that has sent shockwaves through academic and political circles, Harvard University announced on Wednesday a comprehensive investigation into former President Donald Trump's financial activities following his departure from the White House in 2021. The probe, spearheaded by the university's prestigious Kennedy School of Government and its ethics oversight committee, aims to scrutinize allegations of improper financial entanglements, potential conflicts of interest, and the influence of foreign entities on Trump's business empire during his post-presidency years. This development comes amid growing scrutiny of Trump's ongoing legal battles and his potential bid for the 2028 presidential election, raising questions about the intersection of academia, ethics, and national politics.

The investigation was formally unveiled during a press conference at Harvard's Cambridge campus, where university president Dr. Elena Ramirez outlined the rationale behind the inquiry. "As an institution dedicated to the pursuit of truth and ethical governance, Harvard cannot stand idly by when allegations of misconduct threaten the integrity of our democratic institutions," Ramirez stated. She emphasized that the probe is not politically motivated but rather a scholarly effort to examine how former leaders navigate the blurred lines between public service and private gain. The committee, comprising legal scholars, economists, and ethics experts from Harvard and affiliated institutions, will delve into Trump's financial disclosures, international business dealings, and any potential violations of emoluments clauses that lingered from his time in office.

At the heart of the investigation are several key allegations that have surfaced in recent years. Sources familiar with the probe indicate that investigators will focus on Trump's real estate ventures, particularly those involving foreign governments. For instance, reports have highlighted lucrative deals with Saudi Arabian entities linked to the Trump Organization, including golf course developments and hotel partnerships that allegedly continued unabated after Trump's presidency. Critics argue these arrangements could represent undeclared emoluments, echoing lawsuits from his time in office that accused him of profiting from foreign dignitaries staying at Trump properties. The Harvard team plans to analyze financial records, tax filings, and public statements to assess whether these dealings complied with federal ethics standards or if they constituted a form of influence peddling.

Furthermore, the inquiry will explore Trump's involvement with digital media and cryptocurrency ventures post-2024 election cycle. Following his narrow defeat in the 2024 presidential race to incumbent President Kamala Harris, Trump pivoted heavily toward blockchain-based projects and NFT sales through his Trump Media & Technology Group. Allegations have emerged that these ventures may have been used to launder funds or evade transparency requirements. Harvard's economists, including Nobel laureate Dr. Marcus Hale, are expected to model the financial flows and evaluate any irregularities. "This isn't just about one individual; it's about setting precedents for how ex-presidents monetize their influence without undermining public trust," Hale commented in a preliminary briefing document obtained by CNN.

The announcement has elicited strong reactions from both sides of the political spectrum. Trump, speaking from his Mar-a-Lago residence in Florida, dismissed the investigation as a "witch hunt orchestrated by liberal elites." In a fiery post on his Truth Social platform, he wrote, "Harvard, once a great school, is now a joke. They're wasting time on fake news instead of educating kids. Sad!" His legal team, led by attorney Christina Bobb, has vowed to challenge the probe's legitimacy, arguing that a private university has no jurisdiction over a former president's affairs. "This is an overreach by an institution that should focus on academia, not partisan attacks," Bobb said in a statement.

On the other hand, supporters of the investigation, including prominent Democrats and ethics watchdogs, have praised Harvard's initiative. Senator Elizabeth Warren, a Massachusetts native and vocal Trump critic, lauded the move as "a vital step toward accountability." In an interview with CNN, Warren elaborated: "For too long, figures like Trump have operated in a gray area, blending business with politics. Harvard's expertise can shine a light on these shadows and inform future legislation." Organizations such as Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) have offered to collaborate, providing documents from their own investigations into Trump's finances.

This is not the first time Harvard has waded into politically charged waters. The university has a history of engaging with national issues, from civil rights studies in the 1960s to climate policy analyses in recent decades. The Kennedy School, in particular, has produced reports on presidential ethics, including a 2022 paper that critiqued the Trump administration's handling of conflicts of interest. However, this direct investigation into a living former president marks a bold escalation. Legal experts note that while Harvard lacks subpoena power, it can leverage public records, Freedom of Information Act requests, and voluntary testimonies to build a compelling case. The probe is expected to culminate in a public report by early 2026, potentially influencing congressional hearings or even Justice Department actions.

Broader implications of the investigation extend beyond Trump himself. Political analysts suggest it could set a precedent for how academic institutions monitor and critique powerful figures. In an era of increasing polarization, where universities are often accused of liberal bias, Harvard's move risks alienating conservative donors and alumni. Already, some prominent Harvard graduates, including venture capitalist Peter Thiel, have publicly condemned the probe, calling it "academic activism at its worst." Conversely, progressive voices argue that such inquiries are essential for safeguarding democracy, especially as Trump eyes a political comeback.

The investigation also touches on themes of institutional power and accountability. Trump's post-presidency has been marked by a series of legal entanglements, including ongoing cases related to the January 6 Capitol riot, classified documents mishandling, and election interference in Georgia. Harvard's probe could intersect with these, providing scholarly analysis that bolsters or challenges prosecutorial efforts. For example, if the committee uncovers evidence of foreign financial influence, it might prompt renewed calls for stricter post-presidency regulations, such as mandatory financial disclosures or bans on certain international dealings.

Experts from other institutions have weighed in on the potential outcomes. Dr. Laura Simmons, a professor of political science at Yale University, told CNN that "Harvard's involvement elevates the discourse from partisan bickering to evidence-based scrutiny. This could lead to reforms in how we view the 'revolving door' between politics and business." Meanwhile, conservative commentator Ben Shapiro criticized the effort on his podcast, labeling it "elitist grandstanding" that distracts from real issues like campus antisemitism and free speech debates.

As the investigation unfolds, it promises to generate heated debates and possibly new revelations. Harvard has committed to transparency, planning interim updates and public forums to discuss findings. The university has also established an independent oversight board to ensure the probe remains impartial, drawing members from diverse political backgrounds. This step addresses concerns about bias, with Ramirez asserting, "Our goal is truth, not headlines."

In the context of America's evolving political landscape, this Harvard-led inquiry underscores the enduring tension between power, money, and ethics. With Trump remaining a dominant force in Republican politics—polls show him leading hypothetical 2028 primaries—the investigation could either tarnish his legacy or fuel his narrative of victimhood. Regardless of the outcome, it highlights the role of academia in holding leaders accountable, a tradition that dates back to the founding of the republic.

The probe's scope extends to Trump's family members and associates, examining entities like the Trump Organization and its international subsidiaries. Investigators will review partnerships in countries such as Turkey, the Philippines, and India, where Trump-branded properties have raised eyebrows due to their timing with diplomatic engagements during his presidency. Financial forensics experts will employ advanced data analytics to trace fund flows, potentially uncovering patterns of evasion or non-compliance with U.S. sanctions.

Public interest in the matter is high, with social media buzzing about the implications. Hashtags like #HarvardVsTrump and #TrumpEthicsProbe have trended, reflecting a divided populace. Supporters share memes portraying Harvard as a beacon of justice, while detractors circulate conspiracy theories about deep-state involvement.

Ultimately, this investigation could reshape perceptions of post-presidential conduct. If successful, it might inspire similar efforts at other universities, creating a network of academic watchdogs. For Trump, it represents yet another front in his ongoing battles, one fought not in courtrooms but in the halls of ivy-covered academia. As the nation watches, the outcome may well influence the ethical standards expected of future leaders, ensuring that the pursuit of power does not come at the expense of integrity. (Word count: 1,248)

Read the Full CNN Article at:
[ https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/23/politics/harvard-trump-investigation ]