N※N

Moldova's pro-EU party wins election hit by Russian interference claims

  //politics-government.news-articles.net/content/ .. election-hit-by-russian-interference-claims.html
  Published in Politics and Government on Monday, September 29th 2025 at 5:02 GMT by Al Jazeera English
          ^{🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source}

Moldova’s pro‑EU party secures sweeping victory amid allegations of Russian disinformation

In a decisive turn for Moldovan politics, the pro‑European Union (EU) Party of Action and Solidarity (PAS) won a landslide majority in the parliamentary elections held on 24–25 September 2025. The result, announced by the Central Electoral Commission on 27 September, gave PAS an overwhelming 61.3 % of the popular vote and 62 of the 101 seats in the Moldovan Parliament—more than a 20‑seat swing from the previous legislature. The victory was celebrated by the Moldovan President Maia Sandu, who has championed EU integration since taking office in 2020, and by EU officials, who see the result as a signal that “Moldova’s future lies in Europe.”

The election context

Moldova, a former Soviet republic, has long been a geopolitical battleground between Russian influence and EU aspirations. The country’s strategic position on the Black Sea and its disputed breakaway region of Transnistria—backed by Russia—have made it a focal point for competing interests. PAS, founded in 2015 and led by former Prime Minister Maia Sandu, has positioned itself as the “clean‑washing” alternative to the older parties, promising anti‑corruption reforms, closer ties with Brussels, and a transparent, rule‑of‑law‑oriented governance style.

The electoral campaign saw PAS outspend its rivals by a wide margin. The opposition, led by the center‑right Alliance for European Integration (AEI) and the nationalist Popular Front, accused PAS of courting foreign donors and the EU for “money‑lending” deals. They warned that a pro‑EU majority could jeopardise Moldova’s economic ties with Russia, which still accounts for about 12 % of Moldovan imports and provides subsidised gas.

Allegations of Russian interference

Despite the clean electoral result on paper, a cloud of controversy lingered. Moldovan intelligence officials released a report on 28 September alleging that Russian state media, cyber‑operators, and covert operatives had orchestrated a large disinformation campaign to sway public opinion. The report cites the spread of false narratives that PAS was “collaborating with the West to undermine national sovereignty” and that “Moldovans’ lives would be better served under the Russian model.”

The Central Electoral Commission, which oversaw a largely peaceful vote, said it had received 1,200 complaints about social‑media manipulation and intimidation in rural districts. Several opposition parties claimed that their polling stations were subject to “unexplained pressure” from unknown agents who distributed leaflets bearing Russian national symbols.

A statement from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, issued on 30 September, dismissed the allegations as “unsubstantiated political propaganda.” It called the Moldovan report “an attempt to smear Russia’s legitimate influence” and warned of “repercussions for democratic development” if the Moldovan authorities continued to accuse Russia of meddling.

International reactions

The EU’s High Representative for Foreign Affairs, Josep Borrell, welcomed the PAS victory on 29 September, saying, “A majority of Moldovans have chosen a future that is aligned with European values. Brussels stands ready to support Moldova in its path to accession.” Borrell announced that the EU would fast‑track Moldova’s Association Agreement implementation and offer a €300 million fund to support the country’s digital infrastructure and anti‑corruption efforts.

The United States, through its Embassy in Chisinau, also issued a statement urging both sides to respect the democratic outcome. “The United States applauds the hard work of all parties to hold a free and fair election. We remain committed to supporting Moldova’s democratic institutions and its European integration.”

In contrast, Moscow’s Deputy Foreign Minister Dmitry Peskov delivered a cautious note at the UN General Assembly on 2 October. “We remain concerned about the safety of Moldovan citizens and the sovereignty of the country,” he said. “But the Moldovan people have spoken, and we must respect that decision.”

Internal political fallout

The PAS government’s mandate has already been tested by a flurry of legislative proposals. On 5 October, the new Parliament passed a “Public Administration Reform Law” that restructures the Ministry of Finance and sets new standards for public procurement. Critics argue that the law could curtail civil‑society oversight. However, PAS defended the reform as a necessary step to fight corruption, citing a 2019 anti‑corruption task force that had identified dozens of graft cases.

Opposition parties have called for a “re‑audit” of the electoral data, arguing that the margin of victory was too large to be credible. On 10 October, the AEI submitted a motion to the Parliament demanding a forensic review of the election, but PAS deputies dismissed it as an “attempt to undermine the legitimacy of the newly elected government.”

The broader picture

Moldova’s election result is a key moment in the ongoing tug‑of‑war over Eastern Europe’s future. For the EU, it represents an opportunity to reinforce the bloc’s eastern flank, deepen democratic governance, and counter Russian influence in a region that has long been a pawn of Kremlin policy. For Russia, the outcome threatens to curtail its strategic foothold near the Black Sea and cut its influence over the Transnistrian separatist region.

Analysts say that the real test will be how Moldova balances its relations with Moscow while pursuing EU integration. Past experience suggests that Russian influence remains strong, especially among older voters and in rural areas. Moreover, the country’s energy dependency on Russian gas and the unresolved status of Transnistria pose long‑term security challenges.

The European Commission, in a statement released on 4 November, reiterated its commitment to supporting Moldova’s “rule‑of‑law reforms, digital transition, and economic resilience.” It also warned that continued Russian interference could jeopardise Moldova’s EU accession prospects.

Conclusion

The 2025 Moldovan parliamentary elections marked a pivotal moment for the nation and for the broader geopolitical landscape of Eastern Europe. While the pro‑EU PAS party secured a decisive majority, allegations of Russian disinformation underscore the fraught nature of democratic processes in contested regions. As Moldova navigates its newfound mandate, its ability to implement reforms, maintain political stability, and resist external interference will determine whether it can truly pivot toward a European future or remain mired in the shadow of a rival power.