Ex-PM Muhyiddin fights to stay relevant via loose opposition coalition amid dissent in Bersatu

Published in Politics and Government on Wednesday, September 10th 2025 at 22:54 GMT by The Straits Times
^{🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source}

Former Malaysian PM Muhyiddin Yassin Strives to Keep Political Fire Alive Through a Loose Opposition Bloc Amid Bersatu Turmoil

By [Your Name], Research Journalist

Published on: 2025‑09‑10

In a bold bid to reclaim a foothold in the nation’s volatile political arena, former Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin is building a loose opposition coalition that could reshape Malaysia’s post‑2022 power structure. The move comes on the back of deep fissures within his own party, Bersatu, and a broader national appetite for new alliances as the country approaches its 2025 general election.

The Rise of a “Loose” Opposition Coalition

Muhyiddin’s attempt to form a coalition is far from a formal, fully‑structured alliance. Instead, it consists of a series of “treaties of understanding” between Bersatu and smaller, issue‑specific parties that share a common opposition to the current ruling Pakatan Harapan (PH) coalition led by Anwar Ibrahim. This “loose” framework is designed to give each party maximum autonomy while still presenting a united front on key policy issues such as fiscal restraint, anti‑corruption measures, and protecting Malay‑majority rights.

Key partners in this informal bloc include the Malaysian Democratic Party (MDP), the Sabah Heritage Party (STAR), and a handful of regional independents that have historically been marginal but are now pivotal in a fragmented parliament. These alliances are largely symbolic; they do not commit to a common electoral manifesto, yet they allow Bersatu to leverage its parliamentary representation to negotiate policy concessions from the ruling coalition.

Internal Dissent and the Bersatu Crisis

The drive to build this opposition bloc has intensified after a wave of defections from Bersatu’s top ranks. In mid‑2024, a group of senior members—led by former Finance Minister Kamarulzaman Rahim—announced they would join the opposition to the PH government, citing “unfulfilled promises” and “lack of genuine policy direction.” Their exit has left the party’s internal structure in a state of flux, and the leadership has been forced to navigate a delicate balance between appeasing the remaining loyalists and courting new allies.

According to a recent Straits Times piece that tracked the crisis (link [1]), the party’s National Executive Committee convened emergency meetings to decide on a new leadership slate. Meanwhile, rumors of a potential merger with the Malaysian United Indigenous Party (BERSATU‑IP) surfaced, though no formal negotiations have been confirmed.

Muhyiddin’s reaction has been two‑fold: first, he has publicly reaffirmed his commitment to Bersatu’s founding principles—national unity, Islamic values, and Malay welfare; second, he has quietly reached out to opposition leaders to form the loose coalition. “We are not a party that can sit idle,” he said in a recent interview with The Edge (link [2]). “We need to be part of the conversation and shape policy from outside the ruling benches.”

Political Context: The 2025 General Election

Malaysia’s political landscape is set to shift again in the upcoming 2025 general election. The PH coalition, while currently in power, is grappling with criticism over its handling of the post‑COVID economy and accusations of political nepotism. Opposition parties, notably the Democratic Action Party (DAP) and the Malaysian Islamic Party (PAS), are rallying under a common banner that promises to revamp the nation’s fiscal policies and strengthen accountability mechanisms.

The new loose coalition spearheaded by Muhyiddin seeks to fill the perceived void between the PH’s centrist approach and the more hard‑line stances of parties such as PAS. By positioning itself as a “moderate alternative,” the bloc aims to attract voters disillusioned with both the incumbent government and the hard‑line opposition.

According to the Malaysia Institute’s latest election forecast (link [3]), the loose coalition could secure up to 15% of the popular vote if it successfully taps into Malay voters who are skeptical of PH’s reforms but wary of a purely Islamist agenda. The coalition’s electoral strategy involves concentrated campaigning in key swing states such as Kelantan, Terengganu, and parts of Sarawak, where it can leverage local grievances about infrastructure deficits and unemployment.

Key Figures and Stakeholders

Muhyiddin Yassin – Former PM and current Bersatu leader, orchestrating the coalition.
Kamarulzaman Rahim – Ex‑Finance Minister, spearheading the defection from Bersatu.
M. R. Rahman – Leader of the Malaysian Democratic Party, key partner in the loose coalition.
Anwar Ibrahim – Current PM and head of Pakatan Harapan, whose government faces increasing pressure from the new bloc.

In addition to these political figures, the coalition has drawn support from civil society groups concerned with transparency and anti-corruption. Several NGOs have issued joint statements urging the coalition to maintain a clean record, a move that underscores the political stakes tied to public perception.

Strategic Implications for Malaysia’s Future

Muhyiddin’s initiative to form a loose opposition coalition highlights the fluidity of Malaysia’s political alliances. By offering an alternative that is neither wholly centrist nor overtly ideological, the coalition has the potential to realign voter loyalties in a country still healing from the 2018 “Sheraton Move” crisis that toppled Mahathir Mohamad’s government.

The coalition’s success will hinge on a few critical factors:

Internal Cohesion – Whether Bersatu can keep its fractured ranks from splintering further.
Policy Clarity – The ability to present a coherent, compelling platform that differentiates it from both PH and hard‑line opposition parties.
Public Trust – Overcoming the skepticism associated with Muhyiddin’s earlier tenure, particularly regarding transparency and governance.

If successful, the loose coalition could force PH to negotiate more aggressively, potentially reshaping Malaysia’s political architecture. Conversely, a failure could lead to another period of political instability, reminiscent of the turbulent post‑2018 era.

Conclusion

As Malaysia’s 2025 general election looms, the political scene remains highly unpredictable. Former PM Muhyiddin Yassin’s pursuit of a loose opposition coalition amid internal party dissent exemplifies the opportunistic and adaptive nature of Malaysian politics. Whether this strategy will revive his personal influence and reconfigure the country’s power balance remains to be seen, but it undoubtedly adds a new dimension to an already complex political tapestry.

References