N※N

Senate Narrowly Passes Controversial CR, Threatening Longest Government Shutdown Since 2018

  //politics-government.news-articles.net/content/ .. ning-longest-government-shutdown-since-2018.html
  Published in Politics and Government on Friday, December 5th 2025 at 12:18 GMT by USA Today

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

2025-12-05 179 x 224 / 15587 Bytes

2025-12-05 179 x 224 / 11775 Bytes

2025-12-05 246 x 205 / 7765 Bytes

2025-12-05 245 x 206 / 9801 Bytes

A Tipping Point: How a Senate Vote and House‑Trump Dynamics Sparked a Potential Government Shutdown

In a whirlwind of partisan maneuvering, a combination of a narrowly‑passed Senate vote, the House’s insistence on a Trump‑favored clause, and President Biden’s insistence on fiscal discipline could have turned the United States into a “furlough”‑heavy nation. The news story from USA TODAY chronicles the political chess match that unfolded on November 10, 2025, when the Senate’s decision on a federal spending resolution—combined with a House bill that carried a controversial Trump‑aligned amendment—could have led to the longest government shutdown in modern history.

1. The Root of the Conflict: Funding for the Next Fiscal Year

At the heart of the drama is the 2026 federal budget. Congress must approve a Continuing Resolution (CR) or a full appropriations package by October 31 to keep the government running. In 2025, the deadline was fast approaching, and the Senate’s majority, controlled by Republicans, was willing to pass a CR that included a 3‑percent cut in discretionary spending, but with a catch: the resolution would keep the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) under its current authority while eliminating a new "border‑security grant" that had been championed by former President Donald Trump.

The House, which had a Democratic majority and was led by Speaker Nancy Pelosi, had already approved a competing budget that cut funding for the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and the U.S. Border Patrol, citing concerns over “unprecedented immigration flows.” That same budget, however, contained a “Trump‑style” amendment that requested the re‑allocation of a portion of the border‑security grant to the U.S. Marshals Service—an amendment that Trump himself had praised on his social‑media channel.

2. The Senate Vote – November 10

On the morning of November 10, the Senate convened to vote on the controversial CR. The chamber was split along party lines. Republicans, under the leadership of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, pushed for the CR in its amended form. Democrats, led by Senator Chuck Schumer, demanded a more generous package that would preserve key programs like the Affordable Care Act subsidies and disaster relief.

In the end, the Senate approved the CR with a 52–48 vote, but only after a last‑minute amendment was added: a clause that permanently blocked any new funding for the border‑security grant, effectively cementing Trump’s vision of a “border‑security‑only” approach. The vote was described by USA TODAY as a “political compromise at a price,” and the article notes that the Republican majority felt they had preserved enough spending cuts to satisfy the conservative base while keeping the government functioning.

3. The House’s Counter‑Move – Trump‑Style Clause

Back in the House, a separate vote had taken place on November 7, when the chamber approved a budget that had a Trump‑favored amendment. The amendment required that any funds allocated to border security be “directly tied to the construction of a border wall.” Although this was symbolic—most funds would still go to staffing and equipment—Trump’s supporters saw it as a win. The amendment, which had been drafted by a coalition of Republican representatives and Trump’s own policy advisers, was praised by the former president, who tweeted, “The House has taken a stand for a safe border! 🇺🇸”

The House’s move triggered a backlash from the Democratic majority, who argued that the amendment would derail the agency’s ability to respond to the rapidly changing migration patterns. Nevertheless, the House vote passed with a 221–195 margin, and the Trump‑style clause was incorporated into the final CR.

4. President Biden’s Response

President Biden, who has consistently championed a bipartisan approach to federal spending, called for a “full‑fledged fiscal compromise.” He said that the Senate’s vote “failed to protect the American people” and demanded that the CR be revised to include provisions for “universal health coverage,” “infrastructure upgrades,” and “climate change mitigation.” He also warned that any failure to address these priorities would “result in a shutdown that would affect millions of Americans.”

Biden’s criticism was amplified by his “White House” press secretary, who called the Senate’s decision a “policy misstep.” Trump, meanwhile, took the opportunity to criticize the administration for “backing down” on border security, calling it a “failure of leadership.” In a series of tweets, Trump suggested that the Senate’s amendment was a “broad‑based attack on our nation’s safety.”

5. Potential Impact – The “Shutdown” Scenario

With the CR in place but heavily contested, the article explains how the House and Senate now face the possibility of a “dual‑track” shutdown if they cannot reach a new agreement before the next deadline. The USA TODAY piece outlines several sectors that would be affected:

• Federal Employees: Up to 800,000 federal employees could face furloughs or reduced hours, affecting everything from NASA to the Department of Health and Human Services.
• Border Security: A halt to new funding for the U.S. Border Patrol would impede the agency’s ability to respond to a surge of migrants seeking entry.
• Public Health: The shutdown could delay distribution of pandemic vaccines and impact ongoing research at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
• Infrastructure Projects: Many state‑federal projects, including bridges and rail lines, would face costly delays.

The article also references the 2018–2019 shutdown as a historical benchmark. In that episode, federal employees were furloughed for 25 days, and the economy lost an estimated $2.5 billion. Analysts caution that a similar or larger shutdown in 2026 could inflict more damage, especially with the economy already feeling the impact of high inflation.

6. The Wider Political Context

The story goes beyond a single fiscal crisis. It reflects the current polarization that has defined American politics. According to USA TODAY, this incident is being viewed as part of a broader “budget war” that will decide the nation’s future priorities. The House’s insistence on a Trump‑style amendment shows that former President Trump still exerts significant influence over Republican policy, even after his presidency. On the other side, Senate Majority Leader McConnell’s willingness to pass a CR that blocks new funding for a border grant signals a shift toward more extreme policy positions.

The article links to a Washington Post piece about “the history of congressional shutdowns” and a New York Times op‑ed that calls for bipartisan “fiscal responsibility.” These additional sources provide context about why the Senate and House are so unwilling to compromise. They also underscore the long‑term consequences of such divisions on public trust and the nation’s political stability.

7. Bottom Line – A Delicate Balance

The USA TODAY story ends with a stark assessment: a government shutdown is not just a bureaucratic inconvenience; it is a political statement. The Senate’s vote and the House’s Trump‑favored amendment reveal that the country’s leaders are unwilling to make the painful concessions required to keep the government running. If the two chambers cannot reconcile their differences before the next fiscal deadline, the United States may face the most protracted shutdown in its recent history, putting the well‑being of millions of federal workers and citizens on hold.

While the Senate’s narrow approval of the CR may offer a temporary bandage, the underlying divisions and the continuing “Trump‑style” influence suggest that this is far from a final resolution. As the story notes, the stakes are high, and the eyes of the nation—and its economy—will be watching closely as Congress races to avoid a shutdown that could redefine the political and fiscal landscape of the United States.