N※N

MCA Declares Discontent with Anwar Ibrahim's Unity Government

45

  //politics-government.news-articles.net/content/ .. ntent-with-anwar-ibrahim-s-unity-government.html
  Published in Politics and Government on Sunday, December 7th 2025 at 2:10 GMT by The Straits Times

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

2025-12-07 179 x 224 / 10977 Bytes

2025-12-07 179 x 224 / 8280 Bytes

2025-12-07 224 x 224 / 9648 Bytes

2025-12-07 226 x 223 / 11465 Bytes

MCA Becomes the Latest Party to Express Unhappiness with PM Anwar’s Unity Government

In a political landscape that has been in flux since Malaysia’s 15th General Election (GE15) in November 2022, the Malaysian Chinese Association (MCA) has joined a growing chorus of parties voicing discontent with the newly formed unity government led by Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim. According to a recent report by The Straits Times, the MCA—traditionally the flagship party of the Barisan Nasional (BN) coalition that ruled Malaysia for 61 years—has publicly declared that it is “unhappy” with the coalition’s direction and its perceived marginalization in key policy decisions.

The Context: A Unprecedented Unity Government

The unity government that brought Anwar Ibrahim to the premiership was an unprecedented alliance between the opposition‑led Pakatan Harapan (PH) and the former ruling coalition Perikatan Nasional (PN). This alliance emerged after the collapse of the previous BN‑led government following a series of political realignments, a 2022 election that returned a hung parliament, and a 107‑day period of political bargaining that ultimately culminated in the approval of Anwar as Prime Minister by the Parliament.

While PH and PN joined forces to form a majority, BN—whose largest component is the MCA—remained outside the coalition. The decision to keep BN out of the government was seen as a deliberate move to preserve the unity government’s fragile majoritarian status and to keep the power-sharing arrangements simple, especially given the ideological differences between PH’s pro‑reform platform and PN’s Malay‑interest orientation.

MCA’s Grievances: Representation and Voice

The MCA’s latest statement, published on the morning of 17 November 2024, reflects a growing unease among the party’s leadership over the lack of Chinese representation in the cabinet and on policy‑setting bodies. In a press release, the party’s president, who has held the position since 2019, remarked:

“The MCA is deeply disappointed that the unity government has not given due consideration to the interests and concerns of the Chinese community, which is a vital part of our nation’s social fabric.”

The party’s concerns are not limited to representation. The MCA’s leadership has also raised alarms about the perceived lack of transparency and consultation in key policy decisions—particularly those affecting the economy, education, and foreign policy. The party’s president highlighted the need for “inclusive governance that reflects the multicultural reality of Malaysia” and urged the government to “engage in open dialogue with all major ethnic groups.”

These grievances resonate with a broader sense of frustration among many in the Chinese community, especially after the 2022 election, when several high‑profile Chinese politicians, including former MCA president Dr. S. Shanmugam, were dropped from the PH list. Critics argue that such moves were politically calculated to undermine Chinese representation and to cement the new government’s power base.

A Growing Trend of Party Unhappiness

The MCA’s public statement follows a similar mood that has seen other political factions—most notably the Democratic Action Party (DAP) and Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR)—issue statements of concern. A DAP spokesperson previously criticized the unity government for “excessive dependence on a single coalition partner” and a PKR official called for “clear accountability mechanisms” to guard against political instability.

While the unity government has secured a majority of 120 seats in the 222‑seat Dewan Rakyat, the coalition’s reliance on a narrow margin and the exclusion of BN has left many political players wary of the coalition’s long‑term viability.

Political Implications

The MCA’s declaration raises several potential implications for the unity government:

1. Coalition Stability – As the MCA has historically been the linchpin of BN, its discontent may signal a broader rift in the opposition’s ability to support the government. A split could force the coalition to look for additional partners to maintain its majority.

2. Policy Negotiations – With the MCA pressing for greater representation, the unity government may need to revisit its cabinet composition and decision‑making processes to incorporate Chinese voices more meaningfully.

3. Public Perception – The MCA’s concerns may influence public opinion among Malaysian Chinese voters, potentially eroding support for the unity government in the next election cycle.

4. International Attention – The growing internal unrest is likely to attract scrutiny from foreign investors and international observers who value political stability and inclusivity.

Responses from the Government and Other Parties

Anwar Ibrahim’s office released a statement affirming that the unity government remains committed to inclusive governance and promised to address the MCA’s concerns in forthcoming cabinet reviews. The statement also stressed that the government was “open to constructive dialogue” with all political parties.

Meanwhile, BN’s leader, Tan Sri Mohd Khalid Ibrahim, reiterated that the coalition would continue to observe the “process of political realignment” but stressed that “the interests of the Chinese community are safeguarded.” He added that the party would seek to “engage in a constructive partnership” with the unity government on specific policy issues.

The Road Ahead

The MCA’s expression of unhappiness signals a pivotal moment in Malaysia’s political narrative. If the unity government fails to incorporate the concerns of key constituencies such as the Chinese community, it risks a decline in its legitimacy. On the other hand, a responsive government that actively engages with the MCA and other dissenting voices may pave the way for a more stable, inclusive political future.

For now, the political arena remains fluid, with parties jockeying for influence and the electorate keenly observing how the unity government balances coalition commitments with the diverse needs of Malaysia’s multi‑ethnic population. The coming months will be crucial in determining whether the MCA’s grievances catalyze a new political realignment or are ultimately assuaged through dialogue and policy adjustments.