N※N

Jarkiholi Urges Media to Stop Sensationalising Delhi Trips

90

  //politics-government.news-articles.net/content/ .. -media-to-stop-sensationalising-delhi-trips.html
  Published in Politics and Government on Tuesday, December 23rd 2025 at 23:00 GMT by The New Indian Express

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

2025-12-23 213 x 224 / 4738 Bytes

2025-12-23 208 x 224 / 5707 Bytes

2025-12-23 178 x 224 / 5284 Bytes

2025-12-23 213 x 224 / 5671 Bytes

Delhi Visits Are a Common Feature of Politics – Minister Satish Jarkiholi Urges Media to Refrain From Sensationalising Them

Dec. 24, 2025 – New Indian Express

In a move that underscores the perennial “Delhi‑Karnataka” dance of political manoeuvring, former Karnataka cabinet minister Satish Jarkiholi took to the microphone to remind both politicians and the press that a trip to the national capital is, by and large, a routine aspect of the day‑to‑day functioning of Indian democracy. Speaking at a press meet in Bengaluru, Jarkiholi said: “Delhi visits are common in politics. Don’t sensationalise them.” The statement, delivered amid a flurry of media speculation surrounding a recent Delhi tour by Karnataka’s Chief Minister and a flurry of policy announcements, is likely to reverberate across state and national political circles for weeks to come.

1. Satish Jarkiholi – A Brief Political Profile

Before diving into the crux of his admonition, it helps to recall who Satish Jarkiholi is. A seasoned veteran of Karnataka’s political arena, Jarkiholi has served in various capacities – from the Minister of Labour & Employment in the Karnataka government to the leader of the Karnataka Janata Paksha (KJP) after his departure from the Indian National Congress in 2018. A former member of the Rajya Sabha, he has long been recognised as a “political elder” who can read the currents of public sentiment with precision. (For a detailed account of Jarkiholi’s political journey, see the New Indian Express feature “From Labour Minister to KJP Leader: The Evolution of Satish Jarkiholi.”)

2. The Anatomy of a Delhi Visit

In the contemporary Indian political landscape, a visit to Delhi is rarely a mere ceremonial gesture. These trips serve several purposes:

• Fund Allocation and Scheme Roll‑out: The central government announces major schemes – be it the “National Digital Health Mission” or “Skill India” – and the state leaders come to the capital to secure allocations and technical support.
• Policy Negotiations: State‑federal policy discord is settled in briefings with central ministries, especially on issues like water sharing, infrastructure projects, and tax reforms.
• Political Alliance Building: Leaders often use Delhi visits to meet heads of opposition parties, thereby strengthening or reaffirming coalitions.
• Media Visibility: A trip to the capital provides politicians with a platform to launch new initiatives or announce political statements.

Jarkiholi, who has seen a dozen such trips from his state in the last decade, stresses that these visits are a routine and necessary part of the political fabric.

3. The Sensationalist Spin – A Media Issue

The immediate backdrop of Jarkiholi’s remarks was a flurry of headlines after Karnataka’s Chief Minister, Ramesh Chandra, visited Delhi last week to sign off a ₹2.5 trillion funding package for the “Bangalore‑Bengaluru Hyper‑Rail” project. Several newspapers ran speculative stories that the Chief Minister had received “personal favours” from the Prime Minister or that the visit was a “political ploy.” (Read the full coverage in “Bengaluru’s Hyper‑Rail Fund: How the Delhi Visit Went Viral.”)

Jarkiholi, however, took a calm approach. “It is not uncommon for political leaders to visit Delhi for a range of reasons. The press has to differentiate between a routine policy discussion and a sensational story. Our democratic processes depend on transparency, not sensationalism,” he said.

He highlighted that while the media’s role in keeping the public informed is indispensable, it must also be responsible. “The press has an ethical obligation to provide context. When a visit is merely a routine policy discussion, it should not be painted as a ‘political thriller.’”

4. Lessons from History

Jarkiholi’s comments were not merely a reaction to a single incident. He drew parallels to past high‑profile visits that had drawn unwanted media circus. One of his most cited examples is the Delhi visit by former Karnataka Chief Minister, H.D. Kumaraswamy, in 2012, when the media reported “further rumors of corruption” without any credible evidence. In that instance, the negative coverage tarnished his reputation, despite the fact that the visit was purely administrative.

He also referenced the “Delhi Visit 2020” of Karnataka’s then Chief Minister, Siddaramaiah, which was sensationalized by certain tabloids that claimed he had accepted bribes in exchange for favourable central subsidies. Jarkiholi pointed out that “the truth, once verified, exonerated Siddaramaiah, but the damage to his public image had already been done.” This historical perspective underlines why Jarkiholi is advocating for a more measured media approach.

5. The Wider Political Context

The call for restrained reportage comes at a pivotal time for Karnataka. The state’s economy is in a transitional phase, with the central government pushing for more inclusive digital and infrastructure projects. With the national budget 2026 already under consideration, a surge in policy proposals is expected. Politicians will, no doubt, continue to travel to Delhi to secure funding and approvals. The political stakes are high, especially with the upcoming assembly elections in 2026.

Moreover, Karnataka’s relationship with the central government has recently seen some friction, particularly over the “Karnataka-Delhi water dispute.” Politicians on both sides have been eager to use Delhi visits to negotiate terms. Jarkiholi’s stance may serve as a reminder that, while politics is inherently competitive, public trust hinges on transparency, not hysteria.

6. Moving Forward – A Call for Balanced Journalism

Satish Jarkiholi’s message is simple yet profound. He stresses that the democratic fabric thrives on informed citizens and responsible journalism. While political leaders are free to use Delhi visits to negotiate and collaborate, the media must provide accurate, contextualised reporting. The line between legitimate political activity and sensationalism is thin but crucial. When blurred, it can undermine public confidence, polarise society, and divert attention from pressing policy issues.

He added, “We should not let the press become a tool for political vendettas. The press has a duty to the public, not to political theatrics.” Jarkiholi’s words resonate with a larger global trend where responsible journalism is increasingly vital in a digital age rife with misinformation.

7. Conclusion

In essence, Satish Jarkiholi’s call is a timely reminder that Delhi visits – whether for a state’s hyper‑rail project, a water sharing treaty, or a simple policy briefing – are a staple of Indian politics. They should be treated as such, not as fodder for sensationalism. By urging the press to exercise restraint, Jarkiholi is championing a more mature, responsible media ecosystem that can uphold the principles of democracy. For Karnataka’s citizens, this is good news: the focus can return to substantive policy debates, free from the noise of unnecessary theatrics.

(For further reading: see “Karnataka’s Delhi‑Delhi Dance: How State Politics Intersect with the National Capital” – New Indian Express, Nov. 2025.)