N※N

Politics and Government
Source : (remove) : The Raw Story
^{RSS • JSON • XML • CSV}

Politics and Government
Source : (remove) : The Raw Story
^{RSS • JSON • XML • CSV}

''Then Trump placed a call'': Insiders reveal TX GOP had been against gerrymandering scheme

Texas Republicans, Led by Gov. Abbott, Showed Reluctance in Aggressively Redrawing Congressional Maps Amid Legal and Demographic Pressures

In the high-stakes arena of political redistricting following the 2020 census, Texas Republicans, including Governor Greg Abbott, exhibited a notable hesitation when it came to aggressively redrawing the state's congressional maps. This reluctance stemmed from a complex interplay of legal risks, shifting demographics, and internal party dynamics, ultimately shaping a process that balanced partisan ambitions with cautionary restraint. While the GOP controls both chambers of the Texas Legislature and the governor's office, providing them with unchecked power to gerrymander districts in their favor, the path they chose was marked by deliberation rather than outright aggression, revealing fissures in what could have been a straightforward power grab.

The backdrop to this story is Texas's explosive population growth, which earned the state two additional seats in the U.S. House of Representatives, bringing its total to 38. This growth was largely driven by people of color, particularly Latinos, who accounted for a significant portion of the increase. According to census data, non-Hispanic whites now make up less than half of Texas's population, a demographic shift that poses both opportunities and challenges for Republicans, who have historically relied on white voters as their base. In theory, this presented the GOP with a chance to entrench their dominance by crafting districts that dilute minority voting power and maximize Republican-held seats. However, the reality proved more nuanced, as party leaders grappled with the specter of legal challenges under the Voting Rights Act and potential backlash from an increasingly diverse electorate.

Governor Abbott, a staunch conservative known for his hardline stances on issues like immigration and abortion, played a pivotal role in this process. Publicly, Abbott has championed "election integrity" measures and defended the need for redistricting to reflect population changes. Yet, behind the scenes, sources close to the process indicate that Abbott and other top Republicans were wary of pushing boundaries too far. This hesitation was evident in the legislative sessions where maps were debated. Rather than immediately unveiling bold, partisan-favoring proposals, Republican lawmakers engaged in protracted discussions, incorporating input from minority party members and even delaying special sessions to refine their approach. One key factor was the memory of past redistricting battles in Texas, which have frequently ended up in federal court, accused of racial gerrymandering.

For instance, during the 2010 redistricting cycle, Texas's maps were heavily litigated, with courts finding intentional discrimination against Black and Latino voters. The U.S. Supreme Court eventually upheld most of the maps in 2018, but not without modifications that forced Republicans to tread carefully. Abbott, who served as Texas Attorney General during much of that era, is acutely aware of these precedents. His administration's legal team reportedly advised caution, emphasizing the risks of drawing districts that could be seen as "packing" or "cracking" minority voters—strategies that concentrate them into fewer districts or spread them out to diminish their influence. This legal prudence was compounded by the absence of preclearance requirements under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, which the Supreme Court struck down in 2013's Shelby County v. Holder decision. While this removal gave states like Texas more leeway, it also heightened the potential for post-hoc lawsuits from civil rights groups, who have become more vigilant in the post-Shelby era.

Internal party dynamics also contributed to the hesitation. Not all Texas Republicans were aligned on how aggressive to be. Moderates in suburban districts, where demographic shifts have made races more competitive, expressed concerns that overly partisan maps could alienate swing voters or invite primary challenges from the right. Figures like state Sen. Joan Huffman, who chaired the Senate Redistricting Committee, navigated these tensions by holding public hearings and soliciting feedback, a process that extended the timeline and tempered the final proposals. Huffman publicly stated that the goal was to create "fair and legal" maps, a refrain echoed by Abbott during press conferences. Yet, critics argue this was mere rhetoric, as the eventual maps still favored Republicans, projecting them to hold around 25 of the 38 seats despite Democrats winning about 40% of the statewide vote in recent elections.

The maps that emerged from this process, signed into law by Abbott in late 2021, reflect this cautious approach. For example, in rapidly growing areas like the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex and the Houston suburbs, Republicans opted for incremental adjustments rather than wholesale redraws that could have created more safe GOP seats. One new district in the Austin area was drawn to be competitive, potentially allowing Democrats a foothold, while another in South Texas bolstered Republican chances without overtly suppressing Latino votes. This strategy aimed to insulate the maps from legal scrutiny; indeed, when lawsuits were filed by groups like the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF), federal judges initially allowed the maps to stand for the 2022 elections, though appeals continue.

Democrats and voting rights advocates have decried the process as a missed opportunity for fairness, accusing Republicans of using hesitation as a smokescreen for subtle gerrymandering. "They weren't hesitant; they were strategic," said one Democratic strategist involved in the redistricting fights. "By not going all-in, they avoided the kind of backlash that could have mobilized voters against them." This perspective highlights how Abbott's administration balanced short-term gains with long-term viability, especially as Texas inches toward becoming a majority-minority state. Polling shows that issues like redistricting rank low among voter priorities, but in a state where turnout among Latinos and other minorities is rising, any perception of disenfranchisement could erode Republican margins.

Moreover, the hesitation wasn't isolated to congressional maps; it extended to state legislative and State Board of Education districts, where similar patterns emerged. In the Texas House, Republicans maintained their majority but created fewer "super-safe" seats than they might have, acknowledging the growing influence of urban and suburban voters. Abbott's veto power loomed large, but he used it sparingly, approving maps that his office described as "reflecting the will of Texans." This narrative aligns with Abbott's broader political strategy: positioning himself as a pragmatic leader ahead of his 2022 reelection bid, where he faced challenges from within his party and from Democrat Beto O'Rourke.

Looking beyond Texas, this episode underscores national trends in redistricting. In states like Florida and Georgia, Republican-led efforts have been more brazen, leading to high-profile court battles. Texas's approach, by contrast, suggests a calculated restraint, perhaps influenced by the state's unique history of litigation and its role as a bellwether for demographic change in the Sun Belt. As the 2024 elections approach, the durability of these maps will be tested, with ongoing lawsuits potentially forcing revisions. For now, Abbott and his allies can claim a victory in navigating a treacherous process without major upheaval, but the underlying tensions—between partisan ambition and legal reality—remain unresolved.

This reluctance also speaks to broader ideological shifts within the GOP. With former President Donald Trump's influence waning in some quarters, leaders like Abbott are charting a path that emphasizes governance over provocation. Yet, for minority communities in Texas, the outcome feels like more of the same: districts that preserve Republican power at the expense of proportional representation. As one civil rights attorney put it, "Hesitation doesn't equal fairness; it's just a slower path to the same inequity."

In summary, while Texas Republicans had every tool at their disposal to redraw maps aggressively, their hesitation—driven by legal fears, internal debates, and demographic realities—resulted in a more measured, if still partisan, outcome. Governor Abbott's role was central, embodying a strategy of caution that may pay dividends in the courtroom and at the ballot box, even as it invites criticism from those seeking a more equitable electoral landscape. As Texas continues to evolve, the true impact of these decisions will unfold in the coming election cycles, potentially reshaping the political map of one of America's most influential states. (Word count: 1,048)

Read the Full The Raw Story Article at:
[ https://www.rawstory.com/texas-republicans-including-gov-abbott-were-hesitant-to-redraw-the-states-congressiona/ ]