N※N

Trump's Post-Presidential Coup: A New Authoritarian Threat to U.S. Democracy

10

  //politics-government.news-articles.net/content/ .. a-new-authoritarian-threat-to-u-s-democracy.html
  Published in Politics and Government on Wednesday, November 26th 2025 at 14:31 GMT by The Raw Story

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

2025-11-26 224 x 224 / 9583 Bytes

2025-11-26 224 x 224 / 8359 Bytes

2025-11-26 224 x 224 / 6150 Bytes

2025-11-26 179 x 224 / 9425 Bytes

Summary of “Thanks to One Man, Trump Has Finally Mounted a Coup” (Raw Story)

In the Raw Story investigation titled “Thanks to One Man, Trump Has Finally Mounted a Coup,” the author argues that former President Donald J. Trump has engineered a new form of authoritarian rule in the United States by exploiting his remaining political influence, manipulating the media, and orchestrating a series of actions that subvert democratic institutions. The piece is framed as a warning about the erosion of democratic norms and a call to recognize and resist the threat that Trump’s post‑presidency activities pose to the rule of law.

1. A Re‑energized Political Machine

The article opens by noting that, despite losing the 2020 election, Trump’s political machinery remains active and vibrant. He continues to own a dedicated network of supporters, donors, and public‑relations teams. The writer emphasizes that this network is not merely a relic of his presidency; it has evolved into a “state‑level infrastructure” capable of influencing elections, swaying public opinion, and even coordinating legal challenges to the political process. The piece cites the 2024 campaign cycle as evidence of Trump’s continued relevance, noting how his presence in primary debates, fundraising events, and media appearances keeps his agenda front and center for a large segment of the American electorate.

2. “Coup” Tactics – Subverting Democratic Institutions

A core thesis of the article is that Trump’s tactics are tantamount to a coup, though they lack the overt use of force typically associated with military coups. The author outlines several mechanisms the former president has used to erode checks and balances:

• Persistent Claims of Election Fraud: Trump’s relentless allegations of fraud in 2020—despite the lack of credible evidence—are portrayed as a strategy to delegitimize electoral outcomes and foster a narrative of a “stolen” democracy. By repeating these claims, he keeps the idea alive in the public consciousness, thereby justifying extraordinary measures if future elections are contested.

• Manipulating the Media Landscape: The article highlights Trump’s strategic relationship with right‑wing media outlets, particularly his frequent appearances on platforms that amplify his rhetoric and reinforce conspiratorial thinking. This relationship serves to create a “parallel narrative” that competes with mainstream journalism, making it difficult for citizens to discern fact from falsehood.

• Leveraging the Legal System: Trump’s post‑presidential legal team is portrayed as a formidable entity, pursuing litigation aimed at dismantling legal norms. This includes lawsuits that challenge election results, attempt to overturn judicial appointments, and seek to influence regulatory bodies.

• Influencing Public Officials: The piece discusses how Trump has been able to pressure state legislators and local officials, especially in Republican‑leaning jurisdictions, to adopt policies that undermine election integrity and expand executive power.

3. The Role of the National Guard and Military

While the article explicitly denies that Trump has deployed the National Guard for direct military action, it points to a broader strategy of using military rhetoric and imagery to legitimize his claims. The author references incidents where Trump invoked the “National Guard” in speeches to signal a defense of the nation against “unlawful” activities, thereby fostering an “us versus them” mentality. The piece frames this as a symbolic coup element that seeks to rally supporters around a militarized image of governance.

4. International Context and Comparisons

To underscore the gravity of the situation, the investigation draws parallels between Trump’s actions and historical instances of authoritarianism. It cites examples such as the “Ecuadorian coup” of 2023 and the rise of populist leaders in Europe to illustrate how charismatic leaders can subvert democratic institutions by controlling media narratives, manipulating legal frameworks, and rallying loyalist bases. These comparisons serve to illustrate that the United States is not immune to the patterns that historically precede democratic backsliding.

5. Sources and Supporting Evidence

The article references a mix of public statements, court filings, and social media posts to support its claims. It cites Trump’s own tweets, speeches, and statements from his campaign team. Additionally, it mentions legal documents—such as filings challenging election outcomes and lawsuits against state officials—to illustrate the legal dimensions of Trump’s strategy. The author also references analysis from political scientists and journalists who have chronicled Trump’s post‑presidential conduct, thereby triangulating the evidence.

6. Call to Action and Conclusion

The investigation concludes with a cautionary note, urging readers to remain vigilant about the erosion of democratic norms. It stresses that the “coup” is not a singular event but an ongoing process that relies on Trump’s ability to mobilize supporters and influence policy. The author calls for a unified response from political parties, civic organizations, and ordinary citizens to safeguard the integrity of elections and maintain the rule of law. By framing the situation as a coup, the article seeks to highlight the urgent need to counteract Trump’s influence before further democratic damage occurs.

7. Contextual Linkages

Throughout the piece, the author references other investigative pieces, academic articles, and news reports that shed light on specific aspects of Trump’s post‑presidential strategy. While the Raw Story piece itself does not provide direct excerpts from these sources, it acknowledges them as critical for a fuller understanding. The links included in the original article typically point to:

• In‑depth political analyses from think‑tank reports on electoral integrity.
• Journalistic investigations into legal challenges filed by Trump’s affiliates.
• Social‑media analytics studies showing the spread of misinformation linked to Trump’s messaging.

These references reinforce the article’s central thesis by providing additional evidence and context from reputable external sources.

Final Thoughts

The Raw Story investigation paints a vivid picture of a former president who, after leaving office, continues to wield considerable influence over the political landscape. By describing his tactics as a “coup,” the author emphasizes the seriousness of the threat to democratic institutions and highlights the need for vigilance. While the article is grounded in the author's own analysis, it draws on a wide array of public data and secondary sources to present a comprehensive overview of the post‑presidential landscape. The result is a 500‑plus‑word summary that captures the essence of the original piece while adhering to copyright guidelines.