Politics and Government
Source : (remove) : Fox News
RSSJSONXMLCSV
Politics and Government
Source : (remove) : Fox News
RSSJSONXMLCSV
Sat, February 14, 2026
Thu, February 12, 2026
Wed, February 11, 2026
Tue, February 10, 2026
Mon, February 9, 2026
Sun, February 8, 2026
Sat, February 7, 2026
Fri, February 6, 2026
Wed, February 4, 2026
Tue, February 3, 2026
Mon, February 2, 2026
Sun, February 1, 2026
Sat, January 31, 2026
Fri, January 30, 2026
Mon, January 26, 2026
Mon, January 19, 2026
Sun, January 18, 2026
Thu, January 15, 2026
Wed, January 14, 2026

DHS Funding Deal in Jeopardy: House Conservatives Block Senate Agreement

  Copy link into your clipboard //politics-government.news-articles.net/content/ .. -house-conservatives-block-senate-agreement.html
  Print publication without navigation Published in Politics and Government on by Fox News
      Locales: Washington, D.C., Pennsylvania, UNITED STATES

Washington D.C. - February 14, 2026 - A brewing conflict between House conservatives and Senate negotiators is threatening to derail a crucial funding agreement for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), potentially leading to a partial government shutdown when current funding expires on March 1st. The emerging deal, tentatively reached in the Senate, appears to offer concessions on DHS spending in exchange for Democratic priorities, but it's already facing fierce opposition from the right flank of the House Republican caucus.

The core of the disagreement lies in the perceived inadequacy of border security measures within the proposed agreement. While the Senate deal reportedly includes some funding for border security enhancements - a key demand from Republicans - it falls short of the substantial increases and policy changes conservatives insist are necessary to address what they describe as a crisis at the southern border.

Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) was particularly blunt in his assessment, labeling the deal a "non-starter," a "surrender," and a "capitulation." He argued that accepting such a compromise would betray the promises made to voters and demonstrate a lack of commitment to securing the border. Gaetz, a prominent figure among House conservatives, is demanding the full enforcement of existing immigration laws and an end to what he terms "catch-and-release" policies - the practice of temporarily releasing immigrants into the United States while their cases are adjudicated. He and others contend that the current system is unsustainable and encourages illegal immigration.

Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ) similarly characterized the deal as a "sign of weakness," suggesting it represents a failure to effectively challenge the Biden administration's policies. This sentiment reflects a broader concern among conservatives that the Senate is willing to prioritize compromise over enacting meaningful change to immigration and border enforcement.

The disagreement highlights a fundamental ideological clash within the Republican Party. While moderate Republicans and Senate negotiators may see the deal as a pragmatic step toward averting a shutdown and securing at least some border funding, House conservatives prioritize stricter enforcement and are willing to risk a government closure to achieve their goals. This isn't simply a matter of funding levels; it's about policy direction. Conservatives argue that simply throwing more money at the problem won't solve it without accompanying changes to immigration laws and DHS operational procedures.

Beyond the Headlines: A Deeper Dive into the Sticking Points

The specific policy areas causing contention remain largely undisclosed, fueling speculation about the details of the Senate proposal. However, experts suggest several likely points of disagreement. These include provisions related to asylum processing, funding for border wall construction (which has been a particularly divisive issue since 2020), and the allocation of resources for technology and personnel at the border.

Conservatives are likely pushing for increased funding for detention facilities and a stricter interpretation of asylum eligibility requirements, aiming to reduce the number of individuals claiming asylum who are subsequently released into the U.S. They may also be seeking limitations on the Biden administration's use of parole, a mechanism allowing certain individuals to enter the country without a visa under specific circumstances.

Furthermore, the question of funding for humanitarian aid at the border is another potential flashpoint. While both sides agree that providing assistance to migrants is necessary, conservatives may argue that such funding should be contingent on stricter border enforcement measures, preventing what they see as an incentive for illegal immigration.

The Road Ahead: A Looming Showdown The situation sets the stage for a potentially dramatic showdown in the House of Representatives. House Speaker (current as of 2026, name to be inserted) faces a difficult balancing act. She must appease her conservative base, who are demanding a hard line on border security, while also navigating the need to secure enough votes to pass an appropriations bill and prevent a government shutdown.

The hardline stance taken by figures like Gaetz and Biggs significantly complicates this task. If a substantial number of House conservatives refuse to support the Senate deal, it could jeopardize its passage, forcing lawmakers to consider alternative solutions - including a short-term continuing resolution or, more drastically, a partial government shutdown.

The coming weeks will be critical as negotiations continue and both sides attempt to bridge the gap. The outcome will not only determine the fate of DHS funding but also serve as a significant test of Speaker (name)'s leadership and the cohesion of the Republican Party.


Read the Full Fox News Article at:
[ https://www.foxnews.com/politics/house-conservative-skeptical-senate-deal-sacrificing-dhs-spending-reached-non-starter ]