Ohio Mandates Cybersecurity Standards for Local Governments


🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source
The new requirements, tucked in the new state budget, follow a string of cyberattacks against Cleveland and other local governments around the state.

Ohio Mandates Cybersecurity Standards for Local Governments, Addressing Ransomware and Data Protection
Ohio is implementing a new wave of cybersecurity regulations aimed at bolstering the defenses of its local governments – cities, counties, townships, school districts, and other public entities – against increasingly sophisticated cyberattacks. The rules, formally adopted by the Ohio Department of Technology (ODT) and taking effect in early 2025, represent a significant shift towards proactive security measures and address critical vulnerabilities that have plagued municipalities across the state and nation. A key and particularly controversial element is the requirement for explicit public approval before any local government can make ransomware payments.
The impetus behind these new rules stems from a growing recognition of the severe financial and operational consequences faced by Ohio’s local governments when they fall victim to cyberattacks, especially ransomware incidents. Recent years have seen a surge in attacks targeting smaller municipalities with limited IT resources, often resulting in data breaches, disruption of essential services (like water treatment or emergency response), and substantial recovery costs. These incidents not only impact taxpayers directly but also erode public trust in government institutions.
The new regulations are structured around a tiered system based on the size and complexity of each local government. This approach acknowledges that larger entities with more resources require more robust security protocols than smaller, rural communities. The tiers dictate specific requirements ranging from vulnerability scanning and penetration testing to incident response planning and employee cybersecurity training. All levels, however, must adhere to fundamental principles including establishing a designated cybersecurity point person, implementing multi-factor authentication for critical systems, regularly patching software vulnerabilities, and developing comprehensive data backup and recovery procedures.
A core component of the new rules focuses on risk assessment. Local governments are now obligated to conduct regular assessments to identify potential vulnerabilities within their IT infrastructure and develop mitigation strategies. This includes evaluating third-party vendors who have access to government data, a common entry point for attackers exploiting weaknesses in supply chains. The regulations emphasize the importance of continuous monitoring and improvement, recognizing that cybersecurity is not a one-time fix but an ongoing process.
The most notable and potentially contentious aspect of the new rules concerns ransomware payments. Ohio joins a small but growing number of states attempting to curb this practice, which experts widely condemn as incentivizing further attacks. The rationale behind prohibiting unauthorized payments is multifaceted. Paying ransoms doesn't guarantee data recovery; it simply funds criminal enterprises and encourages them to target other vulnerable organizations. Furthermore, it can violate sanctions laws if the ransomware group operates under international restrictions.
The requirement for public approval before a local government can pay a ransom introduces a layer of transparency and accountability that was previously absent. This means any decision to pay a ransom must be presented to and approved by elected officials and potentially even undergo public scrutiny. The ODT has stated this provision is intended to ensure that such decisions are made with careful consideration of the legal, ethical, and financial implications, rather than under duress during an active attack. While acknowledging the pressure governments face when critical systems are locked down, the state believes this oversight is crucial to prevent irresponsible or illegal actions.
The implementation of these rules isn’t without its challenges. Many smaller local governments lack the internal expertise and resources to fully comply with the new requirements. The ODT recognizes this and plans to offer training programs, technical assistance, and grant opportunities to help these entities build their cybersecurity capabilities. Furthermore, the state is working to develop a framework for assessing compliance and providing ongoing support.
Beyond the immediate technical aspects, the regulations also emphasize the importance of fostering a culture of cybersecurity awareness within local governments. Employees at all levels need to be educated about phishing scams, social engineering tactics, and other common attack vectors. The ODT intends to provide resources and training materials to facilitate this effort.
Ultimately, Ohio’s new cybersecurity rules represent a proactive step towards protecting the state's vital public services and data from increasingly sophisticated cyber threats. The emphasis on risk assessment, layered security measures, and transparency in ransomware payment decisions signals a commitment to building resilience within local governments and safeguarding taxpayer information. While challenges remain in implementation and ongoing compliance, the regulations mark a significant advancement in Ohio’s approach to cybersecurity for its public sector. The requirement for public approval of ransom payments is particularly noteworthy, reflecting a growing national consensus that paying criminals should not be an option without careful consideration and oversight.
Read the Full Cleveland.com Article at:
[ https://www.cleveland.com/news/2025/08/ohio-sets-new-cybersecurity-rules-for-local-governments-including-public-approval-of-ransomware-payments.html ]