N※N

Elite-Dominated Parliament: The Root of Bangladesh's Political ills

38

  //politics-government.news-articles.net/content/ .. ent-the-root-of-bangladesh-s-political-ills.html
  Published in Politics and Government on Monday, December 8th 2025 at 16:16 GMT by The Daily Star

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

2025-12-08 179 x 224 / 19770 Bytes

2025-12-08 223 x 224 / 10164 Bytes

2025-12-08 179 x 224 / 11513 Bytes

2025-11-24 224 x 224 / 11456 Bytes

Elite‑dominated parliament: a source of many ills in Bangladesh

The Daily Star’s recent feature, “Elite dominated parliament, source says many ills,” offers a scathing look at how the composition and conduct of Bangladesh’s national legislature have become a breeding ground for corruption, patronage and ineffective governance. The article is grounded in a report produced by a local think‑tank that studied parliamentary membership, the socio‑economic background of MPs, and the outcomes of parliamentary oversight. It is a clear reminder that a democratic body can quickly devolve into a club of the powerful if checks and balances are not enforced.

1. The problem: a parliament that looks like an elite club

Bangladesh’s unicameral parliament has 350 seats, including 50 seats reserved for women. Yet the article points out that the vast majority of MPs come from wealthy, politically connected families. Many are children or relatives of former presidents, prime ministers, or powerful local politicians. The elite dominance is evident not only in the number of seats but also in the committee chairmanships that control budget allocations, legislative scrutiny and the appointment of key public servants.

The report highlights that the “elite” are not only defined by wealth but also by social status. A high proportion of MPs have attended elite universities (like the University of Dhaka, Jadavpur University, and foreign institutions), and a handful of them hold dual citizenship or have overseas business interests. This concentration of power means that parliamentary debates often revolve around protecting the interests of a narrow elite rather than addressing the needs of the 150‑million population.

2. The ills that follow from elite dominance

The article goes on to list a series of “ills” that the think‑tank’s report has linked to the elite composition:

Each of these issues is backed up by anecdotal evidence and data presented in the report. For instance, the article quotes a senior civil‑service official who says that in the last decade, “more than 80 % of the new ministerial appointments came from families already in power.” It also cites an investigative report that found that a large portion of the 2018 parliamentary bills were sponsored by MPs whose parents were on the board of major state corporations.

3. Voices from the debate

The Daily Star article intersperses the data with a series of interviews and statements:

• Parliamentary Reform Advocate – The think‑tank director explains that “the elite domination creates a perception that Parliament is a privilege rather than a service.” She urges for stricter anti‑corruption laws, especially around the “parliamentary privilege” clause.
• Opposition Leader – The opposition MP speaks about the need for a “real opposition” that can question the ruling party’s agenda. She claims that the current elite‑dominated Parliament “acts like a one‑party club.”
• Academic Commentator – A professor of political science says that Bangladesh’s constitutional framework has failed to limit the size of the “political class.” She proposes reforms such as a “mandatory transparency register” for MPs’ assets and a “census of MPs’ family backgrounds.”

The article also refers readers to a prior piece that investigated how many of the parliamentary seats were won by political dynasties: “Bangladesh Parliament’s political dynasties: A new report shows that 45 % of seats belong to family members of former MPs.” That piece is linked in the article for those who want deeper statistics.

4. The way forward: suggested reforms

Toward the end, the article outlines a set of concrete reforms that the think‑tank believes could help shift Bangladesh’s parliament from elite dominance to a more inclusive, accountable body:

1. Transparent asset disclosure – MPs must file comprehensive, verified asset statements before elections, subject to audit.
2. Strengthening parliamentary privilege – Amend the parliamentary privilege clause to make it contingent on the conduct of a member, with the possibility of revocation.
3. Re‑designing committee composition – Ensure that a substantial proportion of committee chairs and members come from opposition parties and civil society.
4. Electoral reforms – Lower the minimum income threshold for candidacy to reduce the dominance of wealthy families.
5. Public oversight – Create a parliamentary oversight body that is independent and can subpoena witnesses, hold public hearings and publish findings.

The article ends on a hopeful note: “If Bangladesh’s parliament can shed its elite‑dominated skin, it can begin to serve as the true engine of democratic accountability.”

5. Broader context

The Daily Star piece does not exist in a vacuum. It is part of a broader conversation about the state of democracy in South Asia. Links in the article point to other relevant readings, such as:

• “Parliamentary oversight in South Asian democracies: A comparative review”
• “Women in politics: Challenges and breakthroughs in Bangladesh”
• “The role of elite families in shaping post‑colonial governance”

These links help readers see that the elite dominance problem is not unique to Bangladesh but part of a larger pattern seen across the region. They also bring in comparative data that underscores how other countries, like Nepal and Sri Lanka, have taken steps to limit political dynasties.

Final thoughts

In sum, the Daily Star’s article provides a thorough, evidence‑based critique of Bangladesh’s parliament, pointing to the concentration of power among a small elite and the manifold ills that follow. It blends statistical analysis, first‑hand accounts and expert commentary, and ends by proposing reforms that could make the legislative body a true representative of the Bangladeshi people. For anyone interested in understanding how elite dominance can erode democratic institutions, this piece is a timely and indispensable read.