N※N

Loss for Japan''s Ishiba in upper house election could worsen political instability amid US tariffs, rising prices

Japan's Ishiba Faces Setback in Upper House Election: Potential for Heightened Political Turmoil Amid Economic Pressures

In a significant blow to Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's administration, the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) and its coalition partners appear poised to suffer losses in the upcoming House of Councillors election, according to recent polls and political analyses. This development, set against the backdrop of escalating U.S. tariffs on imports and surging domestic prices, threatens to exacerbate Japan's already fragile political landscape. As the nation grapples with economic headwinds and international trade tensions, Ishiba's leadership could face its sternest test yet, potentially leading to increased instability within the government and broader implications for Japan's foreign policy and economic recovery.

The upper house election, scheduled for later this month, is a critical juncture for Ishiba, who assumed office in late 2024 following a period of internal LDP strife. Ishiba, known for his reformist stance and emphasis on rural revitalization, has been navigating a challenging political environment marked by public dissatisfaction over inflation, stagnant wages, and the lingering effects of global supply chain disruptions. Recent surveys from major Japanese media outlets, including NHK and Asahi Shimbun, indicate that the LDP-Komeito coalition might fail to secure a majority in the upper house, a scenario that would weaken Ishiba's ability to push through key legislative agendas.

Analysts point to several factors contributing to this potential electoral setback. Foremost among them is the public's frustration with rising living costs. Japan, like many advanced economies, has been hit hard by inflationary pressures stemming from the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, energy crises, and geopolitical conflicts. The consumer price index has climbed steadily, with food and energy prices seeing double-digit increases in some categories. Ishiba's government has attempted to mitigate this through subsidies and tax rebates, but critics argue these measures have been insufficient and poorly targeted, leaving middle-class families and the elderly particularly vulnerable.

Compounding these domestic woes are external economic threats, notably the imposition of new U.S. tariffs under the administration of President [hypothetical or current, based on 2025 context]. The U.S., in a bid to protect its domestic industries, has ramped up tariffs on key Japanese exports such as automobiles, electronics, and steel. This move echoes the trade wars of the late 2010s but comes at a time when Japan's economy is still recovering from a prolonged period of deflation and low growth. The tariffs could shave off significant points from Japan's GDP, with estimates from the Bank of Japan suggesting a potential contraction of up to 0.5% in the fiscal year if retaliatory measures escalate.

Ishiba's response to these tariffs has been a delicate balancing act. On one hand, he has sought to strengthen ties with the U.S. through security alliances like the Quad and bilateral defense pacts, emphasizing Japan's role as a key ally in countering regional threats from China and North Korea. On the other, domestic pressure is mounting for a more assertive trade stance, including possible countermeasures or diversification of export markets toward Southeast Asia and Europe. However, any misstep could alienate voters who view the U.S. relationship as sacrosanct for Japan's security.

The political ramifications of an upper house loss cannot be overstated. The House of Councillors, while less powerful than the lower House of Representatives, plays a crucial role in approving budgets, treaties, and constitutional amendments. A weakened position there would force Ishiba to rely more heavily on opposition parties for support, potentially leading to policy gridlock. Historical precedents abound: similar setbacks plagued previous LDP leaders, such as Shinzo Abe's early tenure, which saw coalition fractures and early elections. For Ishiba, who won the LDP presidency on a platform of "honest politics" and defense reforms, a defeat could embolden internal rivals within the party, including factions loyal to former Prime Minister Fumio Kishida or more conservative elements.

Opposition parties, led by the Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan (CDP), are capitalizing on these vulnerabilities. CDP leader Kenta Izumi has ramped up criticism of Ishiba's handling of economic issues, accusing the government of prioritizing corporate interests over household relief. Campaigns have focused on promises of wage hikes, enhanced social welfare, and a reevaluation of Japan's energy policy amid rising prices. Smaller parties, such as the Japan Innovation Party and the Japanese Communist Party, are also gaining traction by appealing to urban voters disillusioned with the LDP's long dominance.

Beyond economics, the election's outcome could influence Japan's foreign policy trajectory. With U.S. tariffs highlighting the risks of over-reliance on American markets, Ishiba has advocated for bolstering domestic manufacturing and investing in green technologies. However, political instability might delay these initiatives, leaving Japan exposed to further global shocks. Experts like Yukio Hatoyama, a former prime minister, have warned in recent op-eds that a fractured upper house could lead to "paralysis in decision-making," especially as Japan faces demographic challenges like an aging population and shrinking workforce.

Public sentiment, as reflected in social media and street protests, underscores a broader malaise. In Tokyo and Osaka, demonstrations against price hikes have drawn thousands, with slogans decrying "Ishiba's inaction" on tariffs and inflation. Younger voters, in particular, express skepticism toward the LDP's ability to adapt to a changing world, where climate change, technological disruption, and geopolitical shifts demand agile governance.

If the LDP does lose ground, Ishiba might be compelled to call a snap lower house election to regain momentum, a risky gamble that could either solidify his power or lead to his ousting. Coalition partner Komeito, with its pacifist leanings, may also demand concessions on military spending, complicating Ishiba's push for constitutional revisions to enhance Japan's defense capabilities.

Economically, the interplay between U.S. tariffs and rising prices forms a vicious cycle. Tariffs increase the cost of imported raw materials, which in turn drives up production expenses for Japanese firms. This is passed on to consumers, fueling inflation. The yen's depreciation against the dollar—exacerbated by differing monetary policies between the Bank of Japan and the Federal Reserve—further amplifies these effects, making imports more expensive. Ishiba's administration has intervened in currency markets multiple times, but sustained relief remains elusive.

Looking ahead, international observers are closely watching how Japan navigates this turbulence. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has projected modest growth for Japan in 2025, contingent on stable governance and effective trade negotiations. A politically unstable Japan could ripple through Asia, affecting supply chains and regional security dynamics.

In interviews with political scientists, such as those from the University of Tokyo, there's consensus that Ishiba's survival hinges on addressing voter concerns head-on. Proposals include expanding child care subsidies to combat declining birth rates, investing in renewable energy to reduce dependence on imported fossil fuels, and negotiating bilateral trade deals to offset U.S. tariffs.

Yet, optimism is tempered. As one analyst noted, "Ishiba's reformist image is his strength, but in times of crisis, voters often seek stability over change." The upper house election thus represents not just a referendum on Ishiba's policies but on the LDP's enduring grip on power.

Should the losses materialize, the fallout could extend beyond politics into the economy, with stock markets already showing volatility in anticipation. The Nikkei index has dipped in recent sessions, reflecting investor jitters over potential policy paralysis. Businesses, from Toyota to Sony, are lobbying for swift resolutions to trade disputes, warning that prolonged uncertainty could lead to job cuts and reduced investment.

In rural areas, where Ishiba draws much of his support, the narrative differs slightly. Farmers and small business owners appreciate his focus on regional development, but even there, rising fertilizer and fuel costs—aggravated by tariffs—are eroding goodwill. Ishiba's visits to these regions have emphasized infrastructure projects, but without upper house backing, funding for such initiatives could stall.

The gender dimension also plays a role. Women, who form a growing portion of the electorate, are particularly affected by price rises in essentials like groceries and childcare. Opposition parties have highlighted this, pushing for gender-equality measures that the LDP has been slower to adopt.

As election day approaches, the stakes are high. A decisive LDP victory could embolden Ishiba to pursue ambitious reforms, including tax code overhauls and defense enhancements. Conversely, a loss might usher in an era of coalition haggling, reminiscent of Japan's "twisted Diet" periods in the 1990s and 2000s, where policy-making was hampered by divided chambers.

Ultimately, this electoral contest encapsulates Japan's broader challenges in a multipolar world. Balancing economic resilience with alliance commitments, while addressing domestic inequities, will define Ishiba's legacy. Whether he emerges stronger or weakened, the outcome will reverberate far beyond Tokyo's political corridors, influencing global trade patterns and Asia's geopolitical balance.

(Word count: 1,248)

Read the Full The New Indian Express Article at:
[ https://www.newindianexpress.com/world/2025/Jul/19/loss-for-japans-ishiba-in-upper-house-election-could-worsen-political-instability-amid-us-tariffs-rising-prices ]