N※N

Senate Urges Rapid Passage of Short-Term Funding Bill to Prevent 2024 Shutdown

  //politics-government.news-articles.net/content/ .. -term-funding-bill-to-prevent-2024-shutdown.html
  Published in Politics and Government on Tuesday, December 2nd 2025 at 18:33 GMT by Fox News

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

2025-12-02 179 x 224 / 12098 Bytes

2025-12-02 179 x 224 / 15085 Bytes

2025-12-02 224 x 224 / 8679 Bytes

2025-11-12 224 x 224 / 8319 Bytes

Senate Hopes to Blow Through Procedural Hurdles to Reopen Government Before the Funding Deadline

The United States is approaching a critical juncture in its fiscal calendar. With the federal appropriations deadline fast approaching, the Senate is racing to pass a short‑term funding measure that would keep the government open and avert a shutdown that could last several weeks or even months. In a high‑stakes move that could shape the political landscape for the remainder of the year and influence the 2024 election cycle, Senate leaders are working to navigate a labyrinth of procedural obstacles and partisan gridlock.

The Immediate Threat: A Potential Shutdown

The current federal budget cycle runs out on December 31, 2023. Congress has not yet agreed on a new set of appropriations bills for the 2024 fiscal year, and without a passing of a continuing resolution (CR) or a full‑budget bill, a shutdown would be triggered. In the worst case, the government could be closed for up to 60 days, bringing widespread uncertainty to everything from federal employees’ paychecks to national parks, to the funding of essential programs such as the Department of Defense, Homeland Security, and federal research agencies.

Last year, a partial shutdown in 2021 lasted 35 days, illustrating how quickly a lapse in appropriations can cascade into a crisis that affects the public’s confidence in government. In that instance, the House and Senate had been unable to agree on a CR that covered all agencies. The Senate’s ability to close the gap this year hinges on its capacity to move a bill through its own chamber quickly enough to be sent to the House for consideration.

The Senate’s Short‑Term Solution

The Senate’s solution is a “short‑term funding bill” that would essentially function as a broad‑based continuing resolution. Drafted in collaboration with both Democratic and Republican senators, the bill is designed to keep every federal agency operational for a 90‑day period. The measure is estimated to cost roughly $1.4 trillion and includes funding for major programs such as Social Security, Medicare, the Department of Justice, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Department of Defense. Notably, the bill also includes a carve‑out for the Department of Transportation, a point of contention that has been debated in Senate floor negotiations.

The bill was introduced in the Senate by Senator Jon Tester (D-Mont.) on Thursday, and the Senate Leadership announced that it would be moved to the floor for a debate and vote within the next few days. The proposal has attracted bipartisan support, with key Republican voices such as Senator John Thune (R-S.D.) and Senator Susan Collins (R-Maine.) signing onto the measure. Their endorsement signals a willingness among some Republicans to cross the aisle to prevent a shutdown, albeit while insisting that the Senate must hold a more robust debate on the spending provisions before a final vote.

Procedural Hurdles: The Filibuster, Cloture, and Committee Rules

While the bill enjoys cross‑party support, it still faces procedural challenges. Under current Senate rules, any bill that can be considered a “legislation” requires a cloture vote of 60 senators to overcome a filibuster. If a filibuster is not invoked, the Senate can pass the bill with a simple majority in a “vote of the Senate.” However, the Senate has historically been reluctant to let a short‑term CR sit on the floor without first holding a comprehensive committee review, which can add weeks to the process.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) announced that the Senate would be using a “special rule” to fast‑track the bill. This rule is designed to reduce the debate time to a maximum of 24 hours and would require the cloture vote to be taken within a single session. In addition, Schumer has called for a “suspension of the rules” that would allow the bill to bypass certain committee requirements altogether, effectively giving the Senate the ability to move the measure forward on a unanimous consent basis.

In practical terms, this means that the Senate is attempting to push the measure through the House of Representatives before the 60‑day deadline on December 31. The Senate’s approach is based on a strategic calculation: by passing a short‑term CR in the Senate before the deadline, it can then pressure the House to act swiftly on the same measure, thereby minimizing the risk of a shutdown. This strategy also gives the Senate the ability to negotiate for an “in‑congress” review of the spending provisions, so that any contentious budget items can be addressed later.

The Role of the House

While the Senate’s move is bold, the House of Representatives has not yet been fully aligned on the short‑term bill. House Democrats are pushing for a “full‑budget” approach that includes a “budget resolution” to set a new baseline for the next fiscal year. House Republicans, on the other hand, are looking to impose a spending cap on the bill to ensure that the government’s debt‑free spending is kept within “reasonable limits.” The House has also signaled that it wants to ensure the “government funding act” covers all essential programs, such as federal employment, national defense, and homeland security, to avoid the pitfalls of a partial shutdown.

The House’s lack of a unified stance adds an additional layer of complexity. If the House refuses to pass the Senate’s short‑term bill, the Senate’s attempt to “reopen” the government will be rendered moot. To avoid this, Senate leaders have promised to work with House leadership to negotiate a bipartisan version of the bill that satisfies both chambers’ demands.

Political Implications

Beyond the practicalities of keeping the government running, the Senate’s bid to blow through procedural hurdles carries significant political implications. The 2024 elections are just months away, and a prolonged shutdown could be a political liability for Democrats. The Senate’s move to secure a short‑term funding measure is therefore a way to protect the party’s standing among voters, particularly in states that rely heavily on federal employment and services.

Conversely, Republicans who support the short‑term measure are trying to avoid the perception that they are complicit in an “uncontrolled” spending spree. Some GOP senators, such as Senator Mike Rounds (R-S.D.), have warned that the bill should not become a “blank check” for federal spending. They have called for a post‑shutdown “budget review” to ensure that spending remains within the fiscal limits set by the law.

Conclusion

In the coming days, the Senate will need to marshal its procedural tools, rally bipartisan support, and negotiate with the House to pass a short‑term funding measure that will keep the federal government open through the end of the current fiscal year. The Senate’s ability to navigate the procedural hurdles—filibuster, cloture, and committee reviews—will be critical. If the Senate succeeds, the government will avoid a shutdown, and both parties can avert a potential political disaster. If it fails, a shutdown may ensue, and the ramifications could ripple through the economy, federal workforce, and the national political arena. The stakes have never been higher, and the Senate’s next move will likely shape the rest of 2024 in profound ways.