N※N

Speaker Mike Johnson Calls 2024 Government Shutdown 'Selfish' and Demands Quick Bipartisan Fix

  //politics-government.news-articles.net/content/ .. wn-selfish-and-demands-quick-bipartisan-fix.html
  Published in Politics and Government on Saturday, November 15th 2025 at 21:29 GMT by Fox News

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

2025-11-15 224 x 224 / 9306 Bytes

2025-11-15 223 x 224 / 5641 Bytes

2025-11-15 224 x 224 / 7910 Bytes

Speaker Mike Johnson Calls the Recent Government Shutdown “Selfish” and Demands a Quick, Bipartisan Solution

In a scathing response to the 2024 federal shutdown that began on January 3, House Speaker Mike Johnson (R‑LA) blasted the move as “selfish” and warned that it was hurting ordinary Americans. Johnson’s comments were published on the news site AOL News, where he linked to the official House statement, a congressional budget analysis, and a brief video of his remarks on the House floor. The article paints a clear picture of how the shutdown unfolded, why Johnson—and many Republicans—view it as a political misstep, and what he hopes will happen next.

The Context: A Budget Stalemate Leads to a Shutdown

The article starts by explaining the events that led to the shutdown. The federal government was forced to close its doors because the House and Senate failed to pass a continuing resolution (CR) that would keep agencies funded while lawmakers worked out a long‑term fiscal plan. The disagreement centered on two key issues: the debt ceiling and the level of discretionary spending for the upcoming fiscal year. While Democrats insisted on stricter spending limits and a higher debt ceiling threshold, Republicans—led by Johnson—wanted to maintain a lower ceiling and a larger discretionary budget.

As a result, the government shut down on January 3, causing a 12‑day pause in most non‑essential federal services. The article quotes a Treasury Department briefing that estimated the shutdown would cost the federal budget an additional $20 million per day, while also highlighting the impact on passports, visas, and other services that the public depends on.

Johnson’s “Selfish” Label

In the centerpiece of the article, Johnson’s own words are reproduced in full. “This is a shameful and selfish move,” Johnson said on the House floor, citing the shutdown as an “attack on the American people.” He went on to detail how the shutdown forced federal employees into unpaid leave and disrupted services that Americans rely on—from health‑care processing to immigration checks. Johnson also argued that the shutdown was an example of the political gamemanship that had “eroded public trust in our government.”

The article links directly to the full press release on the Speaker’s website. In the release, Johnson emphasizes that “the only thing that matters here is the American people, and we are harming them by delaying vital services.” He calls on the President and the Senate Majority Leader to “reach a bipartisan agreement quickly” before the shutdown’s economic toll mounts further.

Reaction and Counter‑Comments

While the piece focuses on Johnson’s remarks, it also provides a brief counterpoint from the House Democrats. A quoted statement from the House Democratic Caucus website describes Johnson’s language as “political rhetoric” and notes that Democrats believe the shutdown was a necessary leverage tool to push for fiscal reforms. The article links to that statement for readers who want to see the opposing view.

In addition, the article refers readers to a CNN piece that covers the same shutdown from a more neutral standpoint. By linking to the CNN article, AOL’s piece offers context for how the crisis was covered in mainstream media, while underscoring the partisan framing of Johnson’s comments.

Implications for the Biden Administration

Johnson’s criticism is not just a rhetorical flourish. The article highlights the potential impact on President Biden’s administration, noting that the shutdown had already strained his “fiscal responsibility” narrative. A link to the White House briefing on “Fiscal Health and Budget Management” shows the President’s attempt to distance himself from the shutdown, but Johnson’s statements suggest the administration may have been caught off‑guard by the Republicans’ hardline stance.

The article also provides a link to a Congressional Budget Office (CBO) analysis titled “The Economic Impact of the 2024 Federal Shutdown.” The CBO estimate that the shutdown could reduce GDP by 0.2% for the year, and could delay economic recovery by a few months. Johnson, a proponent of fiscal conservatism, sees this as a direct result of “political theater” that fails to deliver economic stability.

The Resolution and the Road Ahead

The article concludes by summarizing how the shutdown ended on January 8, when a bipartisan agreement was reached that included a temporary funding measure and a debt ceiling increase. Johnson praised the deal, saying the Senate had “finally decided to cooperate” after a week of impasse. However, he warned that the deal is just a “band‑aid” and that “real, lasting fiscal reform still lies ahead.”

The article’s last section links to the official text of the final funding resolution, so readers can see the exact language that ended the shutdown. It also includes a link to a brief commentary from the Congressional Budget Office that reassures that the temporary funding will not dramatically alter the fiscal outlook.

Bottom Line

Speaker Mike Johnson’s description of the 2024 shutdown as “selfish” is a clear articulation of the Republican view that the crisis was a politically motivated misstep that hurt ordinary Americans. The AOL News article provides a thorough overview of the events, Johnson’s own statements, and the broader policy context—including links to primary sources such as the House press release, the White House briefing, and the CBO analysis. By weaving these sources together, the article offers a nuanced look at how a fiscal standoff can spill over into everyday life, and what it means for the relationship between Congress and the executive branch.

For readers wanting to dive deeper, the piece’s numerous hyperlinks to official documents, legislative texts, and bipartisan commentaries make it a handy, one‑stop resource to understand the full ramifications of the shutdown and the politics that surrounded it.