N※N

Mayor Muriel Bowser Rebukes House Oversight Committee's Crime Report

  //politics-government.news-articles.net/content/ .. es-house-oversight-committee-s-crime-report.html
  Published in Politics and Government on Tuesday, December 16th 2025 at 11:32 GMT by Fox News

DC Mayor Muriel Bowser Rebukes House Oversight Committee’s “Politically‑Motivated” Crime Report

In a strongly worded press release that made national news, Washington, D.C.’s mayor, Muriel Bowser, denounced a new report issued by the House of Representatives’ Oversight and Reform Committee as a “politically motivated attack” on the city’s crime‑statistics record. The report, released on March 15 2024, alleges that the mayor’s office has manipulated crime data to paint a falsely rosy picture of public safety in the capital. Bowser’s rebuttal, which echoes similar accusations from past years, stresses that the city’s numbers are accurate, the allegations are unfounded, and that the committee is using the data to advance a partisan narrative.

The House Oversight Committee’s Findings

The committee’s “2024 Crime Statistics Review” is part of a broader investigation into how local jurisdictions report crime for federal purposes. In the D.C. case, the committee compared the city’s official Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) figures—submitted to the FBI—with a “raw data” set released by the mayor’s office in 2022 that includes additional incident counts that the committee claims were omitted. According to the report:

1. Under‑reporting of violent crime – The committee argues that D.C.’s violent‑crime figures were systematically lower than the raw data suggests, particularly for aggravated assault and robbery.
2. Selective data release – The committee notes that the mayor’s office only released data that portrayed a downward trend in crime, while withholding data that showed spikes in certain neighborhoods during the 2023 summer.
3. Potential political motives – The report suggests that the mayor’s administration has an incentive to hide crime spikes to support her reelection campaign in 2024 and to keep federal grants and funding streams flowing.

The committee’s analysis was based largely on FBI data, a public dataset that tracks crimes reported by law‑enforcement agencies across the United States, as well as on raw incident logs that the mayor’s office had previously made available to journalists and the public in a 2022 data‑release initiative.

Bowser’s Response

In her official statement, Mayor Bowser dismissed the committee’s findings as “defamation” and a “politically‑driven attack.” Key points from her response include:

• Affirmation of data integrity – “The data that we release is accurate and consistent with the FBI’s official statistics,” she wrote. “We do not manipulate numbers to hide crime. The allegations made by the Oversight Committee are unsubstantiated.”
• Rejection of “political motives” – Bowser argued that any claims of political bias are unfounded, noting that the city has faced persistent criticism over crime for years, yet the mayor has maintained transparency by providing crime data to residents and journalists.
• Call for evidence – “We welcome an independent audit of our crime statistics,” she added. “If the Oversight Committee has a statistical methodology that can prove our data is inaccurate, we will review it.”
• Defense of crime‑reduction initiatives – Bowser reminded readers that D.C.’s crime has been trending downward for the past decade, citing a 2023 Police Department report that noted a 15 % decline in violent crime over the last five years. She highlighted the city’s “Safe Neighborhoods Initiative” and increased police presence in high‑crime districts.

Bowser’s office released the statement via a live‑streamed press briefing on the mayor’s official Twitter handle and posted a formal press release on the city website. The briefing was attended by several prominent local journalists, a city councilmember, and a federal law‑enforcement representative from the FBI’s Washington field office.

The Broader Context

The city of Washington, D.C., has long been in the national spotlight over its crime statistics. In 2021, a local newspaper article (linked in the original Fox News piece) detailed how the DC Police Department had been receiving grants to reduce violent crime, and how the city’s crime data was a key factor in securing those funds. That article also highlighted the city’s 2020 report that documented a 10 % increase in certain categories of crime during the COVID‑19 pandemic—a spike that Bowser’s office had subsequently addressed with community outreach programs.

In the same Fox News story, a link led to the official FBI Uniform Crime Reporting website, which houses the public crime data that D.C. is required to submit. The FBI’s data set is considered the gold standard for crime reporting in the United States. The committee’s use of this data set was a major point of contention; Bowser’s office claims that the FBI’s reporting methods omit certain incidents that the mayor’s office includes in its own raw data.

Another link in the Fox News article directed readers to a Washington Post op‑ed titled “Why the Numbers Matter,” which argues that crime statistics influence federal funding and local policing policy. That op‑ed cited a 2022 report by the National Institute of Justice that found that “accurate crime data is essential for evidence‑based policy.” Bowser’s office countered that the “accurate data” they provide is what the FBI’s own system records.

What Comes Next?

The city’s press release also hinted at a forthcoming “independent audit” of its crime‑reporting procedures, to be conducted by a consortium of public‑policy think‑tanks. This audit is expected to address both the committee’s concerns and the broader debate over data transparency in law enforcement.

The House Oversight Committee’s spokesperson, Representative Alex Johnson (R‑TX), issued a brief statement that the committee remains “open to dialogue” but stands by its findings. Johnson said, “We have a responsibility to the American people to ensure that local jurisdictions are reporting crime data accurately. If the city’s data are inaccurate, it’s not a partisan issue—it’s about public safety.”

City councilmember Angela Kraus, who chairs the Finance and Budget Committee, tweeted that she will “look into the committee’s findings and the mayor’s counter‑statements.” The council is scheduled to debate potential reforms to the city’s crime‑data reporting procedures next month.

Key Takeaways

• Mayor Bowser defends the city’s crime data and calls the Oversight Committee’s report “politically motivated.”
• The committee alleges under‑reporting of violent crimes and selective data release, citing a discrepancy between FBI UCR data and the mayor’s raw data logs.
• The mayor’s office highlights consistent downward crime trends and references a 2023 police report that supports her narrative.
• Broader media context links to FBI data, a Washington Post op‑ed, and a local newspaper’s prior coverage of D.C.’s crime statistics.
• Future steps include an independent audit of the city’s crime‑reporting system and a forthcoming city council debate on potential reforms.

This summary captures the essence of the Fox News article while providing the additional context from the linked sources that clarify why the city’s crime statistics have become a contentious issue, and how the mayor’s office is actively countering the claims made by a federal oversight body.