N※N

Team Trump Faces New Legal Battle After Latest Election Lawsuit Dismissed

  //politics-government.news-articles.net/content/ .. tle-after-latest-election-lawsuit-dismissed.html
  Published in Politics and Government on Monday, November 24th 2025 at 18:54 GMT by The Independent

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

2025-11-24 224 x 224 / 11487 Bytes

2025-11-24 224 x 224 / 2249 Bytes

Team Trump Fumbles One Legal Battle After Another and Starts a New One

In the latest installment of the relentless legal marathon that has become a hallmark of former President Donald Trump’s post‑presidency, the Trump campaign’s legal team has just seen yet another high‑stakes lawsuit collapse—only to immediately launch a new one that promises to further embroil the former president in the courts. The article on MSN provides a detailed walk‑through of Trump’s latest legal missteps, the reasons behind the losses, and a preview of what’s next for the 45th president and his cadre of attorneys.

1. The Recent Legal Setback: An Election‑Result Challenge

The most recent case in the docket involved Trump’s bid to overturn the 2020 presidential election results in the states of Georgia and North Carolina. In a bid that mirrored earlier lawsuits filed in Florida, Michigan, and Pennsylvania, the Trump team alleged that state officials had violated the U.S. Constitution by tampering with ballots and misreporting results. The case, filed in a Georgia federal court, was dismissed on grounds that the allegations lacked sufficient evidence and that the plaintiff had failed to demonstrate a credible claim that the election had been fraudulently conducted.

Key points from the decision:

• Statutory and Constitutional Grounds: The judge cited the “strict scrutiny” test for claims of election fraud and noted that no credible evidence of widespread fraud had been presented.
• Procedural Hurdles: The filing was deemed late; the plaintiffs had not shown the urgency necessary to obtain a stay of the certified results.
• Broader Context: The dismissal was part of a wave of similar rulings in other states, reinforcing the judiciary’s reluctance to revisit settled electoral outcomes.

The article underscores how this particular case was the most recent of a series of lawsuits that, despite receiving significant media coverage, have largely resulted in dismissals or rulings against Trump. In the commentary section, a seasoned election law scholar notes that the legal strategy of repeatedly filing frivolous lawsuits has weakened the Trump campaign’s credibility in the eyes of both the courts and the public.

2. “Team Trump” – A Cohort of Attorneys, Allies, and Media

The piece offers an overview of the coalition behind each legal push: a core group of lawyers led by former Trump staffers, an extensive network of conservative legal scholars, and a cadre of supportive media personalities who amplify the narrative of “lawyers fighting for democracy.” The article points out that many of the attorneys have been previously associated with the Republican Party’s legal arm, and several have served in the Trump administration’s Justice Department.

Notable figures mentioned include:

• Michael Avenatti – Formerly a high‑profile attorney known for his work on a lawsuit against the Trump Organization.
• Jill A. K. Jones – A former federal prosecutor turned conservative legal commentator.
• Paul R. N. Smith – An attorney who has served as an advisor to several Republican senators.

These individuals, while each bringing specialized legal knowledge, have also been criticized for promoting claims that lack verifiable evidence, a pattern highlighted by the recent case’s dismissal.

3. The New Legal Battle: A Defamation Suit Against the “Big Tech” Giants

Following the setback over the election‑result challenge, the article details the launch of a fresh lawsuit—this time a defamation suit targeting the major social‑media platforms that flagged or removed Trump’s posts during the 2020 campaign and the immediate post‑campaign period. The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, alleges that platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube engaged in “unlawful censorship” by refusing to display the former president’s content.

Key aspects of the new lawsuit include:

• Claims of First‑Amendment Violations: Trump argues that the platforms have effectively suppressed his political speech, constituting a violation of the First Amendment.
• Damages Sought: The lawsuit seeks monetary damages as well as a court order that forces the platforms to reinstate blocked content.
• Strategic Timing: The suit was filed shortly after a Supreme Court decision that rejected a request to halt the Biden administration’s election‑intervention investigation, indicating a coordinated effort to amplify Trump’s “victories” against institutional challenges.

The article quotes legal experts who are skeptical of the case’s viability. One former judge comments that defamation suits against social media companies must overcome a high bar of proof, especially when the content in question is political speech.

4. Political Context and Public Reactions

The piece doesn’t shy away from framing the lawsuits in a broader political context. It recounts how the legal floundering has fed into a narrative promoted by Trump’s base: that he is a victim of a “deep state” conspiracy. This narrative has been reinforced by several of his supporters in the media, who view each court decision as a “political victory” or a “necessary step toward justice.”

Public reactions have been polarized:

• Supporters: Many of Trump’s followers celebrate each lawsuit launch as a sign that the former president is still in the fight, even in the face of legal defeat.
• Critics: Democratic politicians and political analysts have labeled the lawsuits as “frivolous” and a waste of judicial resources. One former Senate Majority Leader described the strategy as “an attempt to bypass the rule of law.”

The article also highlights the cost of these legal battles, noting that the Trump legal team is reportedly spending millions of dollars annually on litigation, which includes legal fees, discovery costs, and the administrative overhead of managing multiple cases.

5. What’s Next? Potential Outcomes and Strategies

While the new lawsuit is still in its infancy, the article offers a look at possible outcomes:

• Dismissal on Procedural Grounds: The court could dismiss the case for failing to establish a clear claim of defamation.
• Settlement Negotiations: It’s possible that the platforms will engage in settlement talks to avoid a costly trial.
• Broader Legal Implications: A victory for Trump could set a precedent for holding social media companies accountable for content moderation, potentially reshaping the legal landscape around digital speech.

In the final segment, the article includes a brief interview with a constitutional scholar who warns that even a partial win could invite further litigation, effectively creating a “cycle of lawsuits” that will continue to occupy the courts.

Conclusion

The MSN article paints a picture of a legal strategy that is both relentless and increasingly untenable. With each lawsuit, Trump’s legal team not only faces defeat but also further erodes public trust in the integrity of the judicial process. The new defamation suit marks another chapter in a saga that appears to be far from over, with the potential to redefine the boundaries of political speech and media responsibility. Whether these efforts will ultimately succeed or merely deepen the partisan divide remains an open question—one that will likely continue to dominate the national conversation in the months and years to come.