N※N

Manipur Crisis Deepens as Kuki-Zo Demand UT Status

  //politics-government.news-articles.net/content/ .. -crisis-deepens-as-kuki-zo-demand-ut-status.html
  Published in Politics and Government on Saturday, January 31st 2026 at 13:56 GMT by The Quint
      Locales: Manipur, INDIA

Imphal, Manipur - January 31st, 2026 - Manipur remains a state gripped by crisis, as demands for a separate Union Territory (UT) by several Kuki-Zo groups escalate, adding another precarious layer to the already fraught ethnic violence that has ravaged the region for months. The situation, marked by escalating tensions and a lack of clear communication, presents a significant challenge to both the state and central governments.

Since May 2023, Manipur has been consumed by conflict primarily between the Kuki-Zo and Meitei communities. The violence has resulted in over 200 confirmed deaths, although unofficial estimates place the figure significantly higher, and the displacement of over 60,000 individuals. These displaced persons are residing in makeshift relief camps, facing dire humanitarian conditions including shortages of food, medicine, and adequate shelter. While sporadic clashes have continued, the recent demand for a separate UT has injected renewed urgency into the situation, threatening to further polarize the communities and potentially reignite large-scale violence.

At the heart of the current unrest is the Kuki-Zo groups' assertion that the central government previously committed to granting them UT status during prior negotiations. The specifics of these alleged commitments are currently under dispute, with Kuki-Zo leaders claiming a clear understanding was reached regarding a separate administrative unit to safeguard their interests and ensure their security. They argue that a UT would provide them with greater political representation and autonomy, allowing them to address long-standing grievances related to land rights, resource allocation, and cultural preservation. The groups maintain this is not a move towards secession, but a plea for enhanced self-governance within the framework of the Indian Constitution.

The claim of a prior commitment is particularly sensitive. Sources suggest that discussions did take place in the aftermath of escalating tensions last year, involving representatives from the Kuki-Zo communities and central government officials. However, the precise nature of these discussions - whether they constituted a firm promise or merely exploratory talks - remains a point of contention. The lack of transparency surrounding these alleged negotiations has fueled distrust and contributed to the current impasse.

As of today, the Manipur state government has yet to issue a substantive public response to the Kuki-Zo demand. This silence is being interpreted by Kuki-Zo groups as a deliberate attempt to ignore their legitimate concerns, further exacerbating their frustration and deepening the sense of marginalization. Any decision regarding UT status would necessitate significant legal and constitutional considerations. Article 3 of the Indian Constitution grants Parliament the power to admit new states or alter the boundaries of existing ones, but such a move would require careful planning and broad-based consensus.

The potential implications of granting UT status are far-reaching. Experts warn that it could redraw the political map of Manipur, potentially triggering demands for similar administrative divisions from other ethnic groups. This could lead to a cascade of fragmentation and further destabilize the region. Conversely, some analysts believe that a well-defined UT, with clear boundaries and a robust governance structure, could provide a degree of security and stability for the Kuki-Zo community, and potentially pave the way for a more sustainable peace.

However, the most immediate concern is the potential for a resurgence of violence. The demand for a separate UT is viewed by some Meitei groups as a direct threat to the territorial integrity of Manipur. They fear that granting UT status would effectively carve out a significant portion of the state, undermining their own political and economic interests. This has led to counter-protests and inflammatory rhetoric, further inflaming communal tensions.

Efforts to reach out to Manipur state officials for comment have so far proven unsuccessful. Repeated attempts by news organizations, including The Quint, to secure a statement have been met with silence, highlighting a communication breakdown that is hindering efforts to de-escalate the situation. The central government is reportedly engaging in behind-the-scenes negotiations with both Kuki-Zo leaders and the state government, but details of these discussions remain scarce.

The situation in Manipur demands urgent attention. A comprehensive and inclusive dialogue, involving all stakeholders, is crucial to address the root causes of the conflict and find a lasting solution. Failing to do so risks further bloodshed, displacement, and the complete disintegration of a state already on the verge of collapse.