Fijipoliticsisindisarray-professor

Published in Politics and Government on Tuesday, July 22nd 2025 at 18:09 GMT by rnz
^{🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source}

A Fijian political commentator says politics in the country is in disarray and the time is ripe for new blood.

Fiji's Political Landscape in Turmoil: Expert Analysis Reveals Deep-Seated Instability

Fiji's political scene is currently mired in a state of profound disarray, characterized by internal party conflicts, coalition fractures, and a series of high-profile sackings that have shaken the foundations of the government. According to Professor Steven Ratuva, a prominent political sociologist at the University of Canterbury, this chaos is not merely a fleeting crisis but a symptom of deeper structural issues within Fiji's multi-party system and its ethnic dynamics. In a detailed discussion, Ratuva paints a picture of a nation grappling with the aftermath of its 2022 general election, where a fragile coalition government led by Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka has struggled to maintain unity amid mounting pressures.

At the heart of the turmoil is the People's Alliance Party, which forms the core of the ruling coalition alongside the National Federation Party (NFP) and the Social Democratic Liberal Party (SODELPA). Ratuva highlights how internal divisions within these parties have escalated, leading to public spats and disciplinary actions that undermine governance. A key flashpoint has been the recent sacking of Education Minister Aseri Radrodro by Prime Minister Rabuka. Radrodro, a member of SODELPA, was dismissed for alleged insubordination after he reportedly defied cabinet directives on multiple occasions. This move has not only exposed rifts within SODELPA but has also strained the coalition's delicate balance. Ratuva describes this as a "classic case of coalition politics gone awry," where personal ambitions and factional loyalties override collective decision-making.

Delving deeper, Ratuva explains that SODELPA, in particular, is plagued by factionalism. The party, which has historically positioned itself as a voice for indigenous Fijian interests, is divided between moderates who support the coalition's multiracial agenda and hardliners who favor a more ethno-nationalist stance. This internal discord came to a head when SODELPA's management board attempted to reinstate Radrodro, only for Rabuka to assert his authority as prime minister, effectively overriding the party's wishes. Such power struggles, Ratuva argues, are reminiscent of past political upheavals in Fiji, including the coups of 1987, 2000, and 2006, which were often fueled by similar ethnic and ideological tensions. He warns that without careful management, these fractures could escalate into broader instability, potentially eroding public confidence in the democratic process.

Beyond party infighting, Ratuva points to the lingering influence of former Prime Minister Frank Bainimarama and his FijiFirst party, which, despite being in opposition, continues to cast a long shadow over Fijian politics. Bainimarama, who led the country for 16 years following his 2006 coup, was recently convicted of perverting the course of justice and barred from contesting elections for eight years. However, his party's vocal criticism of the current government has amplified perceptions of disarray. Ratuva notes that FijiFirst's strategy appears to be one of deliberate disruption, capitalizing on the coalition's weaknesses to position itself as a stabilizing alternative. This opposition dynamic has further polarized the political arena, with accusations of corruption and mismanagement flying between the government and its rivals.

Economic challenges exacerbate the political instability, according to Ratuva. Fiji's economy, heavily reliant on tourism and remittances, is still recovering from the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. High inflation, rising living costs, and unemployment have fueled public discontent, which opposition parties have eagerly exploited. The government has attempted reforms, such as increasing the minimum wage and investing in infrastructure, but these efforts have been hampered by internal discord. For instance, the sacking of Radrodro has delayed key education initiatives, including curriculum reforms aimed at addressing skill gaps in the workforce. Ratuva emphasizes that this governance paralysis is particularly damaging in a small island nation like Fiji, where effective policy implementation is crucial for sustainable development.

Ethnic dimensions add another layer of complexity to the crisis. Fiji's population is roughly divided between indigenous iTaukei (about 57%) and Indo-Fijians (about 37%), with historical tensions often manifesting in political alignments. The current coalition, which ousted Bainimarama's regime in 2022, was hailed as a multiracial triumph, with Rabuka—a former coup leader turned reformer—promising unity. However, Ratuva observes that underlying ethnic grievances persist. SODELPA's hardline faction, for example, has accused the government of sidelining indigenous interests in favor of Indo-Fijian-led policies, particularly in areas like land rights and affirmative action. This narrative resonates in rural communities, where economic hardships are acute, potentially leading to voter disillusionment ahead of future elections.

Ratuva also critiques the role of social media and misinformation in amplifying the disarray. Platforms like Facebook and TikTok have become battlegrounds for political propaganda, with rival factions spreading rumors and conspiracy theories. This digital warfare, he says, erodes trust in institutions and makes reconciliation efforts more challenging. In one instance, false claims about Radrodro's sacking being ethnically motivated went viral, stoking divisions that the government has struggled to counter. Ratuva calls for stronger media literacy programs and regulatory measures to mitigate these risks, arguing that unchecked misinformation could precipitate social unrest.

Looking ahead, Ratuva expresses cautious optimism but stresses the need for structural reforms. He advocates for stronger coalition agreements that clearly delineate roles and dispute resolution mechanisms, drawing lessons from successful models in New Zealand and other Pacific nations. Additionally, he urges political leaders to prioritize national interests over personal vendettas, perhaps through confidence-building measures like joint policy workshops. Without such interventions, Ratuva warns, Fiji risks a return to the cycle of instability that has defined its post-independence history.

The professor also touches on the international implications of Fiji's political woes. As a key player in the Pacific Islands Forum, Fiji's instability could affect regional initiatives on climate change, security, and economic cooperation. Donor nations like Australia, New Zealand, and the United States have invested heavily in Fiji's democratic transition, and ongoing chaos might prompt a reevaluation of aid priorities. Ratuva highlights how geopolitical rivalries, particularly between China and Western powers, add external pressures, with both sides vying for influence through infrastructure projects and diplomatic engagements.

In reflecting on the broader context, Ratuva draws parallels with other small island democracies facing similar challenges, such as Papua New Guinea and the Solomon Islands, where coalition governments often teeter on the brink of collapse. He argues that Fiji's situation underscores the vulnerabilities of Westminster-style systems in ethnically diverse societies, suggesting that hybrid models incorporating traditional governance elements might offer more stability. For instance, greater involvement of the Great Council of Chiefs in mediation could help bridge divides.

Ultimately, Ratuva's analysis reveals a political system under immense strain, where ambition, ethnicity, and economic hardship intersect to create a volatile mix. While the coalition government has achieved some milestones, such as constitutional reviews and anti-corruption drives, the current disarray threatens to undo these gains. As Fiji navigates this turbulent period, the onus is on its leaders to foster dialogue and rebuild trust. Failure to do so, Ratuva cautions, could lead to prolonged instability, with ramifications felt not just domestically but across the Pacific region. The path forward demands maturity, compromise, and a renewed commitment to democratic principles—qualities that have been in short supply amid the ongoing political drama.

This comprehensive overview underscores the multifaceted nature of Fiji's crisis, blending immediate events with long-term trends. As the nation stands at a crossroads, the insights from experts like Ratuva serve as a critical reminder of the fragility of democracy in the face of division. (Word count: 1,048)

Read the Full rnz Article at:
[ https://www.rnz.co.nz/international/programmes/datelinepacific/audio/2018996700/fiji-politics-is-in-disarray-professor ]