Politicos Owner Is Embarrassing Its Journalists With Garbled AI Slop

Published in Politics and Government on Wednesday, July 23rd 2025 at 9:32 GMT by Futurism
^{🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source}

Axel Springer has repeatedly tried to force AI slop onto Politico but the publication''s writers aren''t having any of it.

Axel Springer's AI Ambitions Backfire in Embarrassing Display of "Slop" Content

In the rapidly evolving landscape of media and technology, few companies have embraced artificial intelligence with as much fervor as Axel Springer, the German publishing giant that owns prominent outlets like Politico, Business Insider, and Bild. Led by CEO Mathias Döpfner, the company has positioned itself as a pioneer in integrating AI into journalism, touting it as a tool to enhance efficiency, cut costs, and revolutionize content creation. However, a recent incident has exposed the pitfalls of this aggressive push, highlighting how AI can produce what critics derisively call "slop"—low-quality, error-riddled output that undermines credibility and embarrasses even the most forward-thinking media empires.

The controversy centers on an AI-generated newsletter from Axel Springer's flagship publication, Bild, which attempted to summarize a Politico article but devolved into a bizarre, incoherent mess. The original Politico piece discussed internal tensions at the European Union regarding agricultural policies, a timely topic amid ongoing farmer protests across the continent. But when Bild's AI tool processed this into a newsletter blurb, the result was a garbled concoction of factual inaccuracies, nonsensical phrasing, and outright fabrications. For instance, the AI inexplicably claimed that the EU was dealing with "flying pigs" as part of the policy debate, a hallucinatory detail that bore no relation to the source material. It went on to misattribute quotes, invent statistics about crop yields, and conflate unrelated events, such as linking the EU's agricultural woes to a fictional "global bacon shortage." This wasn't just a minor glitch; it was a full-blown embarrassment, circulating to thousands of subscribers and quickly drawing ridicule on social media.

To understand the gravity of this fiasco, it's essential to delve into Axel Springer's broader AI strategy. Under Döpfner's leadership, the company has invested heavily in AI technologies, partnering with firms like OpenAI to develop tools that automate everything from headline generation to full article drafting. Döpfner has been vocal about his vision, famously stating in internal memos that AI could replace human journalists for routine tasks, allowing staff to focus on "high-value" work like investigative reporting. This optimism aligns with a wave of industry trends, where media outlets from The New York Times to BuzzFeed have experimented with AI to streamline operations amid declining ad revenues and rising costs. Axel Springer has gone further, implementing AI across its portfolio to generate content summaries, personalized newsletters, and even opinion pieces. In one high-profile move, the company laid off dozens of employees at Bild and Die Welt last year, citing AI as a key factor in restructuring. Döpfner defended the cuts by arguing that AI would democratize information and make journalism more accessible, but critics argue it's a thinly veiled cost-cutting measure that prioritizes profits over quality.

The Bild newsletter debacle isn't an isolated incident but a symptom of deeper issues plaguing AI in journalism. Generative AI models, like those based on GPT architectures, excel at pattern recognition and text generation but often "hallucinate"—producing plausible-sounding but entirely false information. In this case, the AI seems to have drawn from unrelated datasets or simply invented details to fill gaps, resulting in what experts call "confabulation." Media watchers pointed out that the output resembled the kind of low-effort, SEO-optimized sludge that floods the internet, designed more for clicks than accuracy. One Twitter user quipped, "If this is the future of news, we're all doomed to a diet of flying pig stories." The irony is particularly stark given Politico's reputation for rigorous, fact-based reporting on policy and politics. As an Axel Springer property, Politico has largely avoided direct AI integration in its core journalism, but the parent company's experiments inevitably reflect on its subsidiaries.

Reactions within the industry have been swift and scathing. Journalists at Axel Springer-owned outlets expressed frustration anonymously, with some telling Futurism that the incident underscores the risks of rushing AI adoption without adequate safeguards. "We're being asked to trust tools that can't even summarize a simple article without going off the rails," one insider said. External critics, including media ethicists, have raised alarms about the erosion of trust in an era already plagued by misinformation. The Columbia Journalism Review has previously warned that over-reliance on AI could exacerbate the spread of fake news, especially when outputs aren't rigorously edited by humans. In Axel Springer's case, the newsletter appears to have bypassed thorough human oversight, a common shortcut in AI-driven workflows aimed at speed.

This isn't the first time Axel Springer's AI enthusiasm has sparked controversy. Earlier this year, Business Insider faced backlash for using AI to generate article outlines, leading to accusations of plagiarism and subpar content. Döpfner himself has courted debate with provocative statements, such as suggesting that AI could render traditional journalism obsolete. In a 2023 interview, he enthused about AI's potential to "write better than most journalists," a claim that now seems hubristic in light of the Bild blunder. The company's deal with OpenAI allows the AI firm to train on Axel Springer's vast archives, raising ethical questions about data usage and intellectual property. Proponents argue that such collaborations could lead to innovative tools, like real-time fact-checking or multilingual translations, but skeptics fear it commoditizes human creativity.

Broader implications extend beyond Axel Springer to the entire media ecosystem. As AI tools become ubiquitous, newsrooms worldwide are grappling with similar challenges. The Associated Press has used AI for earnings reports, while Reuters employs it for data visualization, but both emphasize human curation to avoid slop. In contrast, Axel Springer's approach seems more aggressive, potentially setting a precedent for others. The incident also highlights job security concerns: with AI handling more tasks, roles for entry-level reporters and editors are diminishing. A report from the International Center for Journalists notes that 40% of media professionals worry about AI-induced unemployment, a figure likely higher in cost-conscious conglomerates like Axel Springer.

In response to the backlash, Axel Springer has downplayed the incident, attributing it to a "technical glitch" in their AI system and promising refinements. A spokesperson told Futurism that the company remains committed to AI innovation, emphasizing that human editors review most content. However, this assurance rings hollow to many, especially as the faulty newsletter was pulled only after public outcry. Döpfner has yet to address the matter personally, but his past rhetoric suggests he views such hiccups as growing pains in a transformative journey.

Ultimately, this embarrassing episode serves as a cautionary tale for the media industry's flirtation with AI. While the technology holds promise for efficiency and scale, it demands rigorous oversight to prevent the production of slop that erodes public trust. For Axel Springer, a company that prides itself on journalistic excellence, the flying pigs fiasco is a stark reminder that not all innovations soar—some crash spectacularly. As the debate over AI in newsrooms intensifies, stakeholders must balance ambition with accountability, ensuring that the pursuit of the future doesn't sacrifice the integrity of the present. If lessons aren't learned, the line between cutting-edge journalism and automated absurdity may blur further, leaving readers to sift through an increasingly unreliable information landscape.

Read the Full Futurism Article at:
[ https://futurism.com/politico-owner-embarrassing-ai-slop ]

N※N

Politicos Owner Is Embarrassing Its Journalists With Garbled AI Slop

Axel Springer's AI Ambitions Backfire in Embarrassing Display of "Slop" Content