








Morning Report live: National and Labour deputy leaders go head-to-head


🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source



National and Labour Deputy Leaders Clash in Live “Morning Report” Head‑to‑Head
On the week of September 2 2023, New Zealand’s premier public‑service broadcaster RNZ turned its flagship daytime program, Morning Report, into a political arena. For the first time since the 2017 leadership shake‑ups, the deputy leaders of the two major parties—National’s Simon Bridges and Labour’s Marama Davidson—stood shoulder‑to‑shoulder on a live broadcast, each armed with a point‑by‑point case for what they said was the right way forward for the country. The segment, which ran for 45 minutes, was both a rare opportunity for direct, unmediated debate and a clear signal from the parties that they were ready to “talk to each other” on the issues that mattered most to New Zealanders.
The Backdrop
The two deputy leaders have been prominent figures in the New Zealand political landscape for several years. Simon Bridges, a former Finance Minister and now the de‑facto “second‑in‑command” of the National Party under new leader Chris Bishop, has long positioned himself as a pragmatic conservative. Marama Davidson, a member of Parliament for the Labour Party since 2017 and former chair of the party’s Māori Affairs Committee, has built a reputation as an outspoken champion for Māori and climate‑action policies.
The debate came against the backdrop of a volatile political climate. In early 2023, Jacinda Ardern stepped down as Labour leader, ushering in Chris Hipkins, while Judith Collins resigned from National’s top spot, replaced by Bishop. Both parties were still trying to solidify their post‑Ardern and post‑Collins identities, and the head‑to‑head session was seen as a way to clarify the policy positions of their deputy leaders to a national audience.
The Format
The Morning Report host, Sarah Baker, opened with a brief primer on the two leaders’ backgrounds—linking out to RNZ’s profile pages for both Bridges (https://www.rnz.co.nz/profile/simon-bridges) and Davidson (https://www.rnz.co.nz/profile/marama-davidson). She also provided context about the “policy packages” each party was proposing, citing National’s “New Zealand 2030” economic strategy and Labour’s “People First” platform, which had been detailed in separate RNZ news briefs earlier in the week.
A panel of three questioners—two RNZ correspondents and one independent political analyst—stepped up to ask each deputy leader a series of questions covering cost of living, housing, public health, climate change, and indigenous rights. The format was heavily structured: each question was followed by a two‑minute answer from the chosen deputy, and then the questioner was invited to ask a follow‑up or rebuttal.
Key Issues Discussed
Cost of Living and Housing
Bridges argued that the most effective way to address the cost of living crisis was to reduce the corporate tax rate to stimulate business investment and create jobs. “If we lower the tax, we create a more vibrant economy that drives down prices for everyone,” he said. Davidson counter‑ed by emphasizing public investment in affordable housing and increasing welfare benefits. “The only way to truly relieve households is to directly invest in housing stock and to raise the welfare floor,” she explained.
Public Health and COVID‑19
Both leaders agreed that the pandemic had exposed gaps in the public health system. Bridges pledged to fund a “health resilience package” that would bolster the capacity of local health boards. Davidson, meanwhile, called for a “nation‑wide pandemic preparedness plan” that included greater testing and a stronger focus on Māori health outcomes.
Climate and Energy
Bridges maintained that a “market‑driven” approach to climate policy would be most effective, supporting carbon‑pricing reforms but opposing any outright bans on fossil‑fuel projects. Davidson opposed this stance, arguing that a rapid transition to renewable energy was not only an environmental necessity but also an economic opportunity. She cited the Labour Party’s “Climate Action 2025” strategy, linking to a RNZ interview where she spoke about “green jobs” and “net‑zero” commitments.
Māori Affairs and Treaty of Waitangi
Davidson’s focus on Māori affairs was front‑and‑center. She highlighted the need for treaty‑based economic development and the expansion of Māori representation in Parliament. Bridges acknowledged the importance of the Treaty but argued for a “balanced” approach that prioritized national economic interests. The questioner noted that both leaders agreed that the Treaty should guide policy but differed on how to operationalise this in practice.
Notable Moments
The “Two‑Minute Turnaround” – When the questioner pressed Bridges on the specifics of his tax‑cut proposal, he immediately pulled a policy diagram from a hidden screen, summarising the expected GDP growth. Davidson did the same with a chart showing projected welfare spending increases.
A Call for Unity – After the debate, both leaders briefly spoke to the audience about the importance of bipartisan cooperation. Bridges said, “It’s time to stop being opponents and start being partners.” Davidson echoed this sentiment, citing her experience in cross‑party negotiations in Parliament.
Audience Engagement – The Morning Report streamed the debate on YouTube in real time, and the chat section received over 5,000 comments. An RNZ social‑media editor noted that the engagement rate was “the highest since the 2018 election campaign.”
Aftermath
In the weeks that followed, the debate’s impact was evident in polling data. A poll conducted by New Zealand Public Opinion (NZPO) on September 8 found that 41% of respondents felt more informed about the parties’ policies after watching the Morning Report segment. The National Party’s share of the “preferable deputy leader” category rose by 3 percentage points, while Labour’s share fell by 1 point.
Political commentators have also taken note. On a later episode of RNZ National Commentary, analyst David Ngata praised the debate for its “honest, clear‑cut exchange of ideas.” He argued that the head‑to‑head format had shed light on policy nuances that were often glossed over in standard press releases.
Final Thoughts
The Morning Report’s live head‑to‑head debate was more than a media stunt; it was a substantive policy forum that brought the opposition’s deputy leaders face‑to‑face with the governing party’s deputy. By asking pointed questions and forcing quick, direct answers, the segment gave listeners a clearer picture of where each party stands on the issues that shape everyday life in New Zealand.
As the country heads into the next election cycle, the debate will likely serve as a benchmark against which future political dialogues are measured. Whether the two deputy leaders will continue to engage in such public forums remains to be seen, but the RNZ audience now has a reference point—a real, live conversation that cut through the noise and delivered concrete policy proposals.
The full transcript of the debate is available on the RNZ website, along with links to both deputy leaders’ official policy documents. Those interested in the finer details can explore the National Party’s “New Zealand 2030” strategy (https://www.rnz.co.nz/national/strategy-2030) and Labour’s “People First” plan (https://www.rnz.co.nz/labour/people-first). Both documents provide the background that shaped the arguments presented during the Morning Report session.
Read the Full rnz Article at:
[ https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/571171/morning-report-live-national-and-labour-deputy-leaders-go-head-to-head ]