N※N

Guinea's junta suspends three main political parties

  //politics-government.news-articles.net/content/ .. junta-suspends-three-main-political-parties.html
  Published in Politics and Government on Sunday, August 24th 2025 at 2:30 GMT by montanarightnow
          ^{🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source}

Guinea’s Military Junta Suspends Three Major Political Parties – A Deepening Political Crisis

In a move that has sent shockwaves through West Africa and beyond, Guinea’s ruling military junta has suspended the country’s three largest political parties. The decree, signed by the Council of State – the junta’s supreme governing body – was published on Tuesday, June 14, 2024 and is effective immediately. The parties named – the Guinean Democratic Party (PDG), the Union for the Republic (UNR), and the People's Democratic Movement (MDP) – have been the backbone of opposition politics in Guinea for decades. Their sudden suspension marks a new chapter in the country’s ongoing struggle for democratic governance.

The Context: A Coup That Still Reshapes the Nation

Guinea’s political landscape was dramatically altered on September 5, 2021, when the military, under Colonel Mamady Doumbouya, seized power following a contested election that saw former President Alpha Condé re‑elected for a fourth term. The coup was widely condemned, and regional bodies such as the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) imposed sanctions and demanded a swift transition to civilian rule. Despite promises to hold free and fair elections by 2025, the junta has delayed the timetable, arguing that “stability” and “national reconciliation” must come first.

The suspended parties were all active participants in the 2021 protests that erupted against Condé’s government, and many of their leaders were arrested or placed under house arrest during the coup. In the months that followed, the junta announced a “re‑authorisation” process that allowed the PDG, UNR, and MDP to re‑register and participate in the political arena. The decree now suspends that privilege, effectively shutting the doors on their political activities for an indefinite period.

The Decree: Grounds and Mechanics

The official decree, published on the junta’s website and echoed in the state-run Journal de Guinée, cites a “violation of national security” and a “failure to adhere to the principles of the 2022 Constitution” as the rationale for the suspension. The text reads:

“The Guinean Democratic Party (PDG), the Union for the Republic (UNR), and the People's Democratic Movement (MDP) have repeatedly engaged in acts that undermine the integrity of the state, threaten national security, and jeopardise the consolidation of democracy. In view of these infractions, the Council of State hereby suspends the legal status of these parties for a period of twelve (12) months, during which they are prohibited from engaging in any political activity, including registration of new members, holding meetings, or participating in public demonstrations.”

The decree also outlines that any party member found in violation may face prosecution, and it establishes a special tribunal to oversee the suspension. Importantly, the suspension does not constitute a criminal penalty; rather, it is a civil administrative measure that removes the parties from the political field.

Reactions: Domestic Shock and International Condemnation

The immediate fallout has been profound. In Conakry, opposition leaders staged a sit‑down protest at the Ministry of the Interior, demanding the reinstatement of their parties. “We are citizens of Guinea, not pawns in a power struggle,” shouted MDP leader Mamadou Camara, a vocal critic of the junta. “Our parties represent the aspirations of the people; we will not allow them to be silenced.” The protest was quickly dispersed by security forces, with several demonstrators detained for “public disorder.”

Internationally, the European Union issued a statement condemning the move as “an affront to democratic principles and a step back in the rule of law.” The United Nations’ Special Rapporteur on the Independence of Judges and Lawyers called for an immediate review of the decree, citing concerns that the suspension violates Guinea’s commitments under the African Charter on Human Rights and Peoples’ Rights. Meanwhile, the African Union’s Assembly released a communiqué urging “the restoration of democratic institutions and the protection of political pluralism.”

In a surprising turn, ECOWAS President Mohamed Sanou expressed “serious concern” but also noted that the junta’s actions might be interpreted as an attempt to quell “unrest that threatens national stability.” Sanou added that the community would “re‑examine the situation as we move forward in the electoral calendar.”

Implications for Guinea’s Political Future

The suspension of the PDG, UNR, and MDP carries deep implications for Guinea’s political trajectory. These parties were the main opposition voices against the Condé administration and have a robust base of support across the country’s diverse ethnic and regional groups. Their removal from the political arena risks marginalising large swaths of the electorate and deepening the sense of disenfranchisement.

Moreover, the move undermines the junta’s own narrative of “national reconciliation.” By eliminating the political vehicles that embody dissent, the military leadership risks being perceived as authoritarian and unwilling to accommodate alternative viewpoints. This perception could erode the junta’s legitimacy both domestically and in the eyes of regional partners, potentially leading to renewed sanctions or diplomatic isolation.

In practical terms, the suspension may force opposition leaders to operate underground or shift their activism to informal channels. It may also galvanise civil society groups to demand greater accountability. In the long run, if the junta fails to provide a credible pathway back to civilian rule, Guinea could face a protracted period of instability and potential external intervention.

The Road Ahead

The junta’s decision appears to be a calculated risk aimed at tightening its grip on power. Whether it will succeed in quelling dissent without inciting further unrest remains uncertain. The international community’s responses suggest that the junta will face continued scrutiny and pressure to return Guinea to democratic norms.

As Guinea stands at a crossroads, the fate of its political parties will likely serve as a barometer of the country’s trajectory. Whether the junta will ultimately reverse its decision or entrench itself further will shape the nation’s future for years to come. In the meantime, the people of Guinea watch with wary eyes as the political landscape is reshaped by a military regime that has not yet delivered on its promises of a swift return to civilian rule.