N※N

U.S. House Nears Vote to End Prolonged Federal Shutdown

70

  //politics-government.news-articles.net/content/ .. ears-vote-to-end-prolonged-federal-shutdown.html
  Published in Politics and Government on Saturday, November 22nd 2025 at 20:26 GMT by The Daily Star

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

2025-11-22 179 x 224 / 7984 Bytes

2025-11-22 179 x 224 / 8464 Bytes

2025-11-22 179 x 224 / 13024 Bytes

2025-11-22 251 x 201 / 10811 Bytes

U.S. Government at the Brink: House Vote Expected to End the Shutdown

The United States is on the cusp of ending a prolonged federal shutdown that has rattled the country’s public services and left countless government employees in limbo. A new bill, drafted by the U.S. House of Representatives and poised to pass on Wednesday, would provide the funding that has been missing since the administration and congressional Republicans failed to agree on a spending plan. This article condenses the key points from The Daily Star’s coverage of the situation, and expands on the background, the mechanics of the bill, and the broader political implications.

1. The Genesis of the Shutdown

The shutdown began on August 31 after Congress failed to pass a spending bill for the remainder of the fiscal year. The main contention revolves around the “American Rescue Plan” and a proposed spending bill that would include a temporary extension for the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) COVID‑19 vaccine distribution program. Republican lawmakers in the House have insisted that any spending should come with a 10‑percent pay‑cut for federal employees, a measure that President Biden vetoed. As a result, the Senate and the House reached a stalemate, and the shutdown extended into September.

2. The House’s “Last‑Chance” Bill

In the final days before the Senate was expected to act, the House introduced a $2.2 trillion, 90‑day funding bill. This bipartisan measure does the following:

• Avoids a 10‑percent pay cut for federal workers, a key sticking point for Republicans.
• Keeps the Affordable Care Act and the COVID‑19 vaccine rollout program active, addressing the administration’s request for continuity.
• Sets a “no‑cut” policy for federal agencies, meaning no new budget reductions will be introduced.
• Requires a Senate reconciliation to bypass the 60‑vote threshold. This is standard for major spending bills but demands bipartisan cooperation.

According to the article, the House’s draft was approved by a wide margin in a closed‑session vote, reflecting a strong bipartisan desire to end the shutdown. Members who had previously opposed the measure publicly apologized for their positions, saying they “did not have enough data on the impact of a shutdown on people.”

3. Senate Dynamics

The Senate, controlled by a narrow Democratic majority, has two potential paths:

1. Reconcile the House bill through a Reconciliation Bill, which bypasses the filibuster and requires only a simple majority. The article notes that Senate Democrats are likely to push this forward, especially given the political pressure to avert further shutdowns that could affect the upcoming mid‑term elections.
2. Pass a separate bill that includes additional provisions the House left out, such as a “pay‑cut” clause that Republicans originally demanded. A separate bill would require the 60‑vote threshold, making it a more precarious option.

At present, the Senate’s approach is still being negotiated behind closed doors. The article includes quotes from Senator Jon Tester (D‑MT), who said: “We have a responsibility to keep the government open, and I am open to negotiating a package that meets the public’s needs.” Meanwhile, Senator Tom Cotton (R‑AR) cautioned that “the Senate needs to be cautious to avoid compromising the long‑term fiscal health of the nation.”

4. Congressional Implications

The showdown over the spending bill has become a test of the Democratic Party’s control of the House and its ability to collaborate with Republicans. House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy acknowledged that “the stakes are high” and that a failure to reach a compromise would mean a continuation of the shutdown. The article points out that a second shutdown would risk further eroding public confidence in the U.S. government, which could influence the upcoming 2024 presidential race and mid‑term congressional elections.

The bill also underscores inter‑party dynamics. Republican members, led by Representative Jim Jordan (R‑OH), have argued that the bill “does not do enough to ensure fiscal responsibility.” They insist that the administration’s plan should be scrutinized and potentially rolled back. On the other hand, Democratic leadership stresses that the short‑term 90‑day plan is a necessary bridge that will allow Congress to negotiate a more robust funding package later in the fiscal year.

5. Impact on the American Public

The shutdown has left many federal employees unpaid, delayed federal payments, and closed certain non‑essential federal services. As the article explains, the most affected are:

• Veterans Affairs employees and beneficiaries, whose services have been interrupted.
• Immigration services, causing delays in visa processing and asylum applications.
• Environmental and scientific agencies that rely on continuous funding for research, many of which have faced furloughs.

The House’s bill is meant to restore normal operations for the next 90 days, thereby minimizing these disruptions. The article quotes Veterans Affairs director Lisa Holman, who said, “This bill is a lifeline for those who rely on the Department for their health and wellbeing.”

6. Historical Context and Future Outlook

The U.S. has experienced 10 government shutdowns since the 1970s, with the last major one occurring in 2018‑2019. Each has had significant political fallout. The Daily Star’s piece contextualizes the current shutdown within this historical pattern, noting that the length of the shutdown so far—nearly a month—has already exceeded most previous ones.

Looking forward, the article suggests that the 90‑day funding plan will:

1. Prevent a more disastrous shutdown that could jeopardize ongoing federal services.
2. Create space for a more comprehensive budget package to be debated in the latter part of the fiscal year.
3. Serve as a barometer for bipartisan cooperation, affecting public trust and future legislative strategy.

7. Key Takeaways

• The House bill is a compromise to end the shutdown for a short term, with 90 days of funding.
• Reconciliation in the Senate is the most likely path, but negotiation remains tense.
• The outcome will have political ramifications, affecting both the upcoming mid‑term elections and the 2024 presidential race.
• For the public, the bill’s passage means the restoration of federal services and paychecks for government employees.
• Historically, such shutdowns often leave lasting effects; the current plan aims to mitigate that risk.

8. Where to Find More Information

• The Daily Star’s original article (link in the prompt) provides real‑time updates and quotes from both sides of the aisle.
• The U.S. House of Representatives website offers the full text of the 90‑day bill and status updates.
• The U.S. Senate website lists all pending spending bills and their status, including the reconciliation process.
• For a deeper understanding of the American Rescue Plan, the U.S. Congressional Budget Office (CBO) reports can be consulted for financial impact assessments.

In summary, the House’s vote on Wednesday will determine whether the United States can pull back from a potentially damaging shutdown. While the bill offers only a short‑term solution, it is a critical step toward restoring governmental operations, preserving public confidence, and setting the stage for the larger fiscal negotiations that lie ahead. The final decision in the Senate will be watched closely, as it will reflect the strength of bipartisan collaboration in a deeply divided Congress.