N※N

Douglas Alexander Slams SNP for 'Weaponising' Mossmorran Quarry Closure

60

  //politics-government.news-articles.net/content/ .. p-for-weaponising-mossmorran-quarry-closure.html
  Published in Politics and Government on Sunday, November 23rd 2025 at 11:02 GMT by The Scotsman

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

2025-11-23 239 x 211 / 12406 Bytes

2025-11-23 198 x 224 / 16704 Bytes

2025-11-23 224 x 224 / 14515 Bytes

2025-11-23 224 x 224 / 13013 Bytes

Douglas Alexander Criticises SNP Over “Weaponised” Mossmorran Quarry Closure

Former Cabinet Secretary for Finance, Douglas Alexander, has launched a sharp rebuke at the SNP‑led Scottish Government, accusing it of “weaponising” the impending closure of the Mossmorran quarry on the Isle of Arran. In a series of comments that appear in The Scotsman, Alexander argues that the decision to shut the quarry is being used as a political tool rather than being driven by sound economic or environmental policy. He further contends that the move will have lasting repercussions for local communities and the wider Scottish economy.

The Heart of the Controversy

The Mossmorran quarry has been a staple of Arran’s industrial landscape for decades, providing high‑quality stone that has been used in projects across Scotland and beyond. Recently, the Scottish Government announced that the quarry would close by the end of 2025, citing a range of factors from dwindling demand to concerns about environmental impact and safety.

Alexander’s critique centres on the timing and political context of the announcement. He suggests that the SNP is leveraging the quarry’s closure to further a broader agenda, perhaps to push a narrative around “sustainable development” or to pressure other political actors. In his view, the government’s approach lacks transparency and disregards the voices of local stakeholders.

A Closer Look at the Political Landscape

To fully appreciate Alexander’s argument, one must understand the broader political backdrop. The SNP has held a majority in the Scottish Parliament since 2007, with a strong focus on issues such as renewable energy, climate change, and social welfare. Critics, however, argue that the party’s policies sometimes conflict with economic realities, especially in rural and industrial communities.

The closure of Mossmorran comes at a time when the Scottish Government is also promoting ambitious plans to transition away from fossil fuels and reduce carbon emissions. Alexander posits that the quarry’s shutdown is part of a wider push toward “green” policies that may not adequately consider the livelihoods of workers and the economic stability of Arran.

The Role of Environmental Considerations

While the SNP frames the closure as an environmental necessity—citing concerns about land degradation, water usage, and the carbon footprint of quarry operations—Alexander questions whether the evidence truly supports such drastic action. He points out that other quarries in the UK have successfully implemented sustainable practices, thereby balancing production with ecological stewardship.

Moreover, the local community on Arran has expressed reservations about the government’s handling of the matter. Several residents and business owners have argued that the quarry’s closure will lead to a loss of jobs, decreased tourism, and a decline in related services such as hospitality and retail. Alexander’s comments echo these concerns, suggesting that the government’s decision may be politically motivated rather than economically justified.

Impact on the Isle of Arran

The Isle of Arran, a popular tourist destination known for its rugged landscapes and vibrant communities, stands to feel the economic shock of the quarry’s shutdown. The quarry has historically been a key employer on the island, and its closure threatens to ripple through sectors such as transport, accommodation, and retail.

Local government officials have called for a more nuanced approach. They argue for a phased wind‑down, investment in alternative industries, or the development of new training programs to equip former quarry workers with skills relevant to emerging sectors, such as renewable energy or digital services. Alexander’s criticism underscores the urgency of such discussions, highlighting the need for a comprehensive strategy that balances environmental goals with economic resilience.

The Government’s Response

In reaction to Alexander’s public statements, SNP spokespersons have reiterated that the decision is rooted in a thorough assessment of environmental impact assessments (EIAs) and a commitment to Scotland’s climate targets. They emphasize that the government intends to work closely with local communities to mitigate the impact, including exploring redevelopment projects and investment in infrastructure.

The Scottish Parliament has seen a flurry of debates on the issue, with cross‑party discussions focusing on how best to support the island’s economy while staying true to national sustainability commitments. While the SNP maintains its stance, opposition parties have taken the opportunity to call for greater accountability and more robust consultation processes.

Conclusion

Douglas Alexander’s critique of the SNP’s handling of the Mossmorran quarry closure raises important questions about the intersection of politics, environment, and local economies. Whether his call to “unweaponise” the decision is seen as a legitimate concern or as a partisan jab remains to be seen. What is clear is that the closure will require a balanced approach—one that ensures environmental stewardship without sacrificing the livelihoods of the island’s residents.

As Scotland continues to navigate its path toward a greener future, the debate surrounding Mossmorran offers a micro‑cosm of the challenges many regions face. The coming months will likely see intensified dialogue, as policymakers, community leaders, and business owners strive to find a solution that respects both ecological imperatives and human welfare.