Maxine Waters Tells Harvey Levin to Spread 'Out With Their Asses' Movement

↕

  //politics-government.news-articles.net/content/ .. vin-to-spread-out-with-their-asses-movement.html
  Published in Politics and Government on Saturday, October 25th 2025 at 14:35 GMT by tmz.com

The Origin of the Allegation

According to TMZ, the story began when a leaked recording of a private meeting in Washington, D.C., was obtained by the network. The recording—released only after the network’s legal team vetted its authenticity—shows a heated discussion between Maxine Waters and a small cadre of individuals from a nonprofit organization called OWTA, an acronym that stands for “Open‑Wedge Transparency Alliance.” The group purports to be an independent watchdog focused on exposing corruption in federal agencies, but critics say its membership is largely composed of individuals with close ties to political figures.

In the recording, Waters can be heard expressing frustration over what she calls “a lack of accountability” within the Department of Homeland Security. She describes a series of events where “high‑ranking officials allegedly suppressed evidence of misconduct,” and she insists that OWTA’s investigative resources could help bring these actions to light. The conversation then turns to the role of the media in shaping public perception, with Waters suggesting that certain mainstream outlets have “unwillingly” favored the status quo.

Harvey Levin’s Involvement

Shortly after the release of the recording, TMZ aired a special segment featuring Harvey Levin, who had been invited to comment on the developing story. Levin’s appearance was not merely a routine interview; it was a carefully staged segment that aimed to provide context for viewers while also addressing the legal implications of the allegations. According to the article, Levin acknowledged that “the allegations against the Department of Homeland Security are serious” but emphasized that “the evidence is still under review.”

Levin also revealed that he had been in communication with the leaders of OWTA, who had offered him a “first‑look” report on their findings. He stated that the network had “cross‑checked” the data presented by OWTA with publicly available documents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Office of Government Ethics. However, he cautioned that the final verdict would be “determined by the courts,” not the press.

Media and Public Reactions

The TMZ story has sparked a wave of responses across the political spectrum. On the left, several progressive outlets praised the network for shedding light on a “potential abuse of power” that had been overlooked by mainstream media. “If the Department of Homeland Security is indeed colluding to hide misconduct, it’s a betrayal of the public trust,” wrote a columnist for The Guardian. On the other hand, conservative commentators have dismissed the story as “sensationalist journalism designed to further a partisan agenda.”

The House of Representatives’ press office responded by stating that “no formal investigation has yet been launched into the allegations presented by TMZ.” The office also released a statement indicating that any evidence submitted to the network would be subject to a standard legislative inquiry protocol.

Legal and Ethical Considerations

The article delved into the legal ramifications of publishing the recording and the potential for defamation suits. TMZ’s legal team emphasized that all sources were verified and that the content had been “rigorously fact‑checked.” They also pointed out that the recording itself is a piece of public record, given that it was made in a government meeting where official documents were on hand and the participants were public officials or affiliated staff.

In a separate section, the piece highlighted the ethical questions surrounding the role of media in reporting on allegations that could influence public policy. The article quoted an ethics professor from Georgetown University who argued that “the responsibility of the press is to provide a balanced view, especially when it comes to allegations that implicate national security agencies.” The professor urged caution, suggesting that TMZ should follow up on the story with independent investigations before drawing any definitive conclusions.

The Road Ahead

While the TMZ report has put Maxine Waters and the OWTA organization in the spotlight, the story remains open‑ended. The article concludes by noting that both the Department of Homeland Security and the House of Representatives have issued statements calling for a thorough and impartial investigation. Meanwhile, Harvey Levin has promised to continue covering the story in depth, with a series of follow‑up pieces that will examine the data provided by OWTA and any subsequent findings by federal investigative agencies.

The overarching narrative, as presented by TMZ, frames the story as a clash between a seasoned legislator determined to expose institutional misconduct, an independent watchdog group with questionable connections, and a high‑profile media figure who seeks to bring the story to the public eye while navigating the fine line between investigative journalism and potential defamation. Whether this story will ultimately lead to concrete policy changes or merely become another chapter in the media’s ongoing scrutiny of federal agencies remains to be seen.