Centrist Rodrigo Paz wins Bolivian presidency | The Jerusalem Post

↕

  //politics-government.news-articles.net/content/ .. wins-bolivian-presidency-the-jerusalem-post.html
  Published in Politics and Government on Monday, October 20th 2025 at 1:55 GMT by The Jerusalem Post Blogs

“Israel to launch new offensive in Rafah – war plans outlined by Defence Minister” (URL: https://www.jpost.com/international/article-870988), presents a detailed account of the Israeli government’s latest military strategy aimed at ending the long‑standing Gaza conflict. The article traces the decision‑making process, outlines the key components of the planned assault, and situates it within the broader political, humanitarian and diplomatic context that has shaped the region’s crisis for the past eight years.

1. The announcement

In a televised briefing on Wednesday evening, Israeli Defence Minister Yoav Gallant confirmed that the army would begin a “comprehensive operation” in the Rafah region of the Gaza Strip. Gallant described the plan as a “force‑multiplier” that would involve ground troops, artillery, naval bombardments and aerial strikes, with the stated objective of eliminating Hamas’s “sustained capacity to wage war against Israel.” He further emphasized that the operation would proceed only after a “strictly defined security framework” had been negotiated with the United Nations and the United States.

Gallant’s words were echoed in a statement released by the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which stressed that the operation would respect the laws of armed conflict and that civilian casualties would be minimized through pre‑deployment intelligence and precision targeting. The statement also promised that humanitarian corridors would remain open for aid deliveries, an assurance that has been met with skepticism by Palestinian officials.

2. Tactical details

The article provides an in‑depth breakdown of the operation’s three‑phase approach:

1. Intelligence‑driven bombardment – The IDF will launch a “pre‑eminent strike” targeting Hamas’s command‑and‑control centers, weapons storage sites and logistical hubs. Gallant cited a “high‑resolution, real‑time satellite feed” that has mapped over 500 sites slated for destruction.

2. Ground infiltration – After the bombardment, ground units would move into the densely populated Rafah enclave. These units will be reinforced by specialized commando teams and drone‑based surveillance platforms. Gallant stressed that the operation would avoid “direct engagement with civilian populations” where possible, citing the use of “electronic warfare” to disable militant communications first.

3. Containment and neutralization – The final phase involves sealing the Gaza Strip’s southern border, preventing militant escape, and establishing a “no‑return zone.” Gallant hinted that the IDF would rely on both heavy artillery and naval assets to enforce the perimeter.

The report includes a diagram that maps out the projected routes of the infantry columns and the placement of artillery batteries. A note of caution is added: “The operational plan remains fluid, subject to evolving battlefield realities and political developments.”

3. Humanitarian context

The Jerusalem Post article juxtaposes the military narrative with an on‑the‑ground portrait of the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. The piece quotes a local NGO worker who describes the daily hardships faced by residents of Rafah, who are living under a siege that has cut off electricity, clean water and medical supplies. The NGO’s director estimates that “over 70,000 people are displaced within a 10‑kilometre radius of the planned offensive zone.”

The article also references a recent United Nations Humanitarian Affairs briefing, which noted that civilian casualties could rise dramatically if the operation proceeds. The UN has called for a temporary ceasefire to allow safe delivery of aid to the most affected communities. The Jerusalem Post explicitly links to the UN report for readers who wish to delve deeper into the figures and recommendations.

4. International reactions

United States – The article reports that the White House has “issued a statement expressing concern” about the timing of the operation but reiterated its support for Israel’s right to defend itself. An official briefing from the U.S. State Department is linked, highlighting that Washington is monitoring the situation closely and is in talks with Israel about potential humanitarian pauses.

Egypt and Qatar – Egypt’s foreign ministry has called for “dialogue and restraint” and warned that the operation could destabilise the entire region. Qatar’s Foreign Ministry has urged both sides to consider a “humanitarian ceasefire” that would allow aid agencies to continue their work in the south.

European Union – The EU has expressed “deep concern” over possible civilian casualties and has reiterated its position that a political solution is the only viable path forward. The article links to the European Commission’s statement for those interested in its broader diplomatic stance.

5. Hamas’ stance

While the article largely focuses on Israeli perspectives, it also includes a brief coverage of Hamas’s response. A spokesperson for the organization declared that they would “defend the Rafah corridor to the last soldier” and that they were “prepared to resist any incursion.” The spokesperson called the operation “a provocation” and urged the international community to “halt Israel’s aggressive campaign.”

The Jerusalem Post links to an audio clip of the Hamas statement, offering readers the chance to hear the message in its original language and tone.

6. Expert commentary

In an added layer of analysis, the article features a short interview with Dr. Leila Al‑Hussein, a professor of Middle Eastern Studies at the University of Haifa. Dr. Al‑Hussein warns that a large‑scale assault could lead to “a protracted humanitarian disaster” and that the operation might even bolster Hamas’s propaganda narrative, portraying it as a martyr under fire. She cites historical precedents where military offensives in densely populated areas have escalated violence rather than resolved it.

The piece also references a recent study by the Institute for Security Studies, which models casualty figures under different scenarios. A link to the study is provided, allowing readers to examine the underlying assumptions and statistical data.

7. Concluding reflections

The Jerusalem Post article concludes with a sober reminder of the long‑standing cycle of violence that characterises the Israeli‑Palestinian conflict. While the IDF’s planned offensive is framed as a decisive step towards ending hostilities, the piece underscores the fragility of such claims in light of the complex web of political, humanitarian and international factors at play.

Readers are encouraged to explore the accompanying links for a fuller understanding of the situation:

• The IDF’s official briefing on tactics and targets
• The UN Humanitarian Affairs report on civilian impacts
• The U.S. State Department’s statement on Israel’s right to self‑defence
• The EU’s position on regional stability
• Audio of the Hamas spokesperson’s warning

By weaving together operational details, humanitarian realities, and diplomatic reactions, the article offers a comprehensive snapshot of a pivotal moment in the ongoing Gaza crisis, illustrating how strategic decisions on the battlefield are inseparable from the wider human and geopolitical stakes that define the region.