N※N

PAS Defends Pardons Board Amidst Reform Calls

  //politics-government.news-articles.net/content/ .. s-defends-pardons-board-amidst-reform-calls.html
  Published in Politics and Government on Friday, February 20th 2026 at 2:04 GMT by Free Malaysia Today
      Locales: Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur, Kelantan, MALAYSIA

Kota Baru, February 20th, 2026 - In a clear signal of intent, PAS President Hadi Awang today reiterated his party's unwavering commitment to the Pardons Board (Lembaga Pardun), or PNS as it's known locally, amidst increasing calls for its reform and even abolition. Speaking to reporters in Kota Baru, Hadi stated that ensuring the continuity of the PNS is a top priority for PAS, regardless of any forthcoming changes to its structure or personnel.

The statement comes at a critical juncture. The PNS has been subjected to intense public and political scrutiny in recent months, fueled by a series of controversial decisions regarding the early release of high-profile convicts. While proponents argue the board plays a vital role in rehabilitation and reintegration, critics have questioned its transparency, consistency, and overall effectiveness. Concerns have been voiced regarding the potential for political influence and the perceived lack of accountability in the pardon process.

"We are focusing on its continuity," Hadi emphasized. "It is important for rehabilitation and reintegration." This seemingly simple statement represents a significant political position. PAS's staunch defense of the current system distinguishes it from other political parties who have indicated a willingness to consider substantial overhauls, or even the complete dismantling of the PNS.

A History of Controversy and Debate

The Pardons Board isn't a new source of contention. For decades, its decisions have occasionally sparked public outrage, particularly when those convicted of serious crimes - corruption, violent offenses - receive early releases. However, the frequency and visibility of these cases have increased, contributing to a growing sense of public distrust. The debate intensified in 2025 when a highly publicized case involving a former corporate executive convicted of embezzlement led to widespread accusations of preferential treatment. Public outcry forced a parliamentary inquiry, which is still ongoing and has revealed significant inconsistencies in the application of pardon guidelines.

What is the Pardons Board and How Does it Work?

The Malaysian Pardons Board is established under Article 42 of the Federal Constitution. It functions to advise the Yang di-Pertuan Agong (the King) on petitions for pardon. The board's composition varies by state, but generally includes the Attorney-General, a judge, and other senior officials. The board reviews applications from convicted individuals seeking a pardon, reduction of sentence, or a review of the conviction. The King ultimately makes the final decision, usually acting on the board's recommendation.

Why is PAS Taking Such a Firm Stance?

Analysts suggest several factors contribute to PAS's strong support for the PNS. Firstly, the party traditionally advocates for rehabilitation and second chances, aligning with the stated purpose of the board. Furthermore, some speculate that PAS sees defending the existing system as a way to demonstrate its commitment to upholding the rule of law, even in the face of public pressure. However, critics point to the party's historical ties with certain individuals who have benefitted from the PNS, suggesting a more self-serving motivation. It is also believed that PAS views any attempt to significantly alter the PNS as a potential power grab by rival political factions. They fear a reformed board could be stacked with individuals hostile to the party's interests.

Future of the Board Uncertain The parliamentary inquiry is expected to deliver its recommendations in March 2026, and these are widely anticipated to include proposals for increased transparency, stricter guidelines for pardon eligibility, and greater oversight of the board's operations. Whether these recommendations will be implemented remains to be seen. The current political landscape is fragmented, and securing a consensus on such a sensitive issue will be challenging. PAS's unwavering opposition to significant changes complicates the situation further.

"The government needs to strike a delicate balance," notes political analyst Dr. Aminah Rahman. "While addressing legitimate concerns about fairness and accountability, it must also preserve the principle of pardon as a mechanism for restorative justice. Simply abolishing the board isn't a solution; it requires careful reform and robust safeguards."

The coming months will be crucial for the future of the Pardons Board. The debate surrounding its role and effectiveness is likely to continue, with PAS firmly positioned as its most vocal defender.