N※N

Minister Nehru Blasts Political Vendetta Over New Lawsuits

45

  //politics-government.news-articles.net/content/ .. blasts-political-vendetta-over-new-lawsuits.html
  Published in Politics and Government on Sunday, December 14th 2025 at 6:47 GMT by The New Indian Express

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

2025-12-14 179 x 224 / 13522 Bytes

2025-12-14 179 x 224 / 8426 Bytes

2025-12-14 179 x 224 / 9218 Bytes

2025-12-14 179 x 224 / 8634 Bytes

Minister Nehru Accuses Political Vendetta Behind Legal Cases: A Closer Look

In a dramatic turn of events that has sent shockwaves through Tamil Nadu’s political landscape, Minister Nehru—one of the senior faces of the ruling AIADMK coalition—has publicly declared that he has committed no wrongdoing and that the lawsuits lodged against him are the result of a deliberate political vendetta. The statement, made in a press conference held on December 14 2025, comes amid a flurry of court filings and an escalating feud between the AIADMK and its arch‑rival, the DMK, that has left many observers scrambling to understand the underlying motives.

The Allegations and the Accused

Minister Nehru, whose full name is V. Nehru Kumar and who serves as Minister for Rural Development and Water Resources, has been the target of three separate criminal cases filed in the past month. The first, a “money laundering” case registered on November 25, alleges that the minister’s family-owned agribusiness was used as a conduit for illicit funds. The second, a “misappropriation of public funds” case, was filed by the Tamil Nadu High Court on December 3, and the third, a “harassment” case, was lodged by a local activist group that has historically been critical of AIADMK officials.

In his statement, Nehru emphasized that he had always maintained a “transparent” record and that all his projects were completed under the scrutiny of the state audit board. He added, “I have done no wrong. I will never do so.” The statement was quickly followed by a barrage of comments from opposition leaders who dismissed Nehru’s claims as “political theatrics” and urged the court to take up the cases with an “objective lens.”

Context: A Long‑Standing Feud

The article notes that the AIADMK, led by Chief Minister M. S. Palanikumar, has long been engaged in a high‑stakes battle with the DMK, headed by J. N. Rao, over control of the state’s development agenda. “The recent allegations against Nehru are, in my view, the latest in a series of politically motivated attacks designed to weaken the AIADMK’s position,” an AIADMK spokesperson said. This claim is not entirely new; several AIADMK leaders have previously accused the DMK of orchestrating legal actions to destabilise the ruling coalition.

The article links to a detailed piece that examines the history of legal battles between the two parties, tracing back to the 2016 election cycle. In that piece, the author notes that the DMK has previously filed 12 criminal cases against AIADMK ministers, many of which were dismissed on procedural grounds. Conversely, the AIADMK has also been accused of misusing its influence to block opposition investigations.

The Legal Dimension

Nehru’s statement drew an immediate reaction from the Tamil Nadu High Court, which has recently taken a more active stance on high‑profile corruption cases. A link to the court’s recent orders is included in the article, highlighting that the court has ordered a preliminary inquiry into the alleged misappropriation case and has directed that no bail be granted pending a full investigation. The court’s orders underscore the increasing willingness of the judiciary to intervene in politically sensitive cases, a trend that has been observed across several Indian states.

The article also references a separate report from the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) that had been quietly reviewing the financial records of Nehru’s family business. While the CBI has yet to file a formal charge sheet, its internal memo—an excerpt of which is provided in the article—suggests that “discrepancies in financial statements” were noted. Nehru’s spokesperson has declined to comment on the CBI’s findings, insisting that the investigation is “unwarranted.”

Public Reaction and Media Coverage

The statement was met with a mixed reaction from the public and the media. Several pro‑AIADMK newspapers echoed Nehru’s frustration, accusing the DMK of exploiting legal mechanisms to sabotage the government’s development plans. Meanwhile, independent journalists and political analysts warned that the accusations could backfire. A link to an opinion piece in The Hindu underscores the risk that “unverified claims may erode public trust in the government.”

The article also highlights social media’s role in shaping the narrative. A trending hashtag, #JusticeForNehru, garnered over 10 million likes within 48 hours, while #PoliticalVendetta trended for the DMK’s top spokesperson. The use of social media appears to be amplifying the political drama and adding pressure on both parties to resolve the matter swiftly.

The Path Forward

As the legal proceedings unfold, the article provides a detailed timeline of the next steps. A preliminary inquiry by the High Court is scheduled for January 5, 2026, and the AIADMK’s internal disciplinary committee will be convened on January 12 to assess whether the minister should be suspended from office pending the inquiry’s findings. The article links to the AIADMK constitution, which stipulates that any minister found to be under investigation can be removed from office by a majority vote of the council of ministers.

Nehru’s statement, while dramatic, underscores the broader struggle between the state’s two dominant parties for legitimacy and control. The article concludes by noting that the outcome of the cases will not only decide the fate of one minister but could also influence the political balance in Tamil Nadu for years to come. Whether the allegations prove to be a genuine legal claim or a calculated political maneuver remains to be seen, but the stakes are undeniably high.