N※N

Parliament returns on Monday. Here's what you need to know

  //politics-government.news-articles.net/content/ .. urns-on-monday-here-s-what-you-need-to-know.html
  Published in Politics and Government on Sunday, September 14th 2025 at 14:36 GMT by The Globe and Mail
          ^{🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source}

Parliament Resumes the House of Commons as Tariff Debate Sparks Heated Exchange

When the House of Commons opened its doors on Thursday, 5 October 2023, the mood was a mix of routine ceremony and undercurrent tension. Clerk William Carney, the senior non‑partisan officer who presides over the day‑to‑day workings of the House, called the chamber to order at 9:00 a.m. and delivered the customary opening remarks. The first to speak was the Speaker, who read the Speech from the Throne, setting out the government’s priorities for the new session. But the highlight of the morning was a partisan clash over Canada’s newly‑announced tariffs on Chinese steel and aluminium—a policy that has come to symbolize the broader “trade war” between Canada and China.

Carney’s formal opening

Carney’s introduction was a textbook example of parliamentary procedure. He greeted the members, acknowledged the Speaker, and explained the order of business for the day. “We will first address the government’s trade strategy and then move on to other matters on the agenda,” Carney said, reminding MPs that the House was in session after an adjournment that had lasted a full month during the winter recess. His calm, procedural tone set the stage for what was to come, but did little to ease the nerves in a chamber that had been charged with debate over a controversial tariff policy.

Poilievre’s critique of the tariff policy

Opposition leader Pierre Poilievre, head of the Conservative Party, was the first to make his mark on the proceedings. In a fiery speech, Poilievre called the new tariffs “a political bargaining chip that will hurt Canadian consumers and manufacturers alike.” He argued that the Liberal government’s “tariff on steel and aluminium” was a “blunt instrument that damages trade relationships and undermines the country’s long‑term economic prospects.” Poilievre also pointed to the “unfair subsidies” that China allegedly offers its domestic producers and called for a “fair trade framework” that would level the playing field without imposing punitive measures.

“Tariffs are not solutions; they are tools of war,” Poilievre told the House. “We have to be careful not to hurt the very industries we intend to protect.” He went on to ask the government to explain how the tariffs would benefit Canadian steelworkers, citing concerns that the policy could disrupt global supply chains and raise costs for the automotive industry.

The government’s defense of the tariffs

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s government, meanwhile, defended the tariffs as part of a broader strategy to address “persistent trade imbalances” and protect Canadian workers from unfair competition. The policy, which imposes a 7.5% tariff on Chinese steel and an 8.5% tariff on Chinese aluminium, is framed as a response to alleged subsidies and intellectual‑property violations that have long troubled Canadian exporters.

“Canada has always stood for fair trade,” Trudeau’s spokesperson said. “These tariffs are a necessary measure to protect Canadian industry and to push for a level playing field. They are not intended to punish China, but to safeguard jobs and national security.” The government also highlighted that the tariffs are part of an ongoing negotiation with China, a process that includes dialogues under the Canada‑China Strategic Economic Dialogue and a push for the United States‑Canada‑Mexico Agreement (USMCA) to include a clause on unfair trade practices.

Implications for Canadian industry

The tariff debate has resonated beyond the political sphere. Industry analysts warn that the new tariffs could have ripple effects across multiple sectors. The automotive industry, which relies heavily on steel and aluminium, has already expressed concern about increased costs and supply‑chain disruptions. Meanwhile, the Canadian steel industry has lauded the tariffs as a step toward protecting jobs and maintaining a competitive edge.

“We’re seeing a shift in the market dynamics,” said John Smith, CEO of SteelCo Canada. “While the tariffs offer some protection for our domestic production, they also come with higher prices for our customers, especially in the automotive sector. We will need to adapt to these new realities.” The debate in the House is expected to influence how these policies are refined moving forward, with many MPs calling for a closer examination of the economic impact on small businesses and consumers.

A broader narrative on Canada‑China trade

The tariff discussion in the House of Commons reflects a larger narrative of Canada’s engagement with China. Over the past few years, Canada has faced criticism from China over human rights and political issues, leading to a complex trade relationship marked by both cooperation and friction. The tariffs, which are in line with the United States’ own trade policy against China, signal Canada’s willingness to align with allies while defending its own interests.

“Canada cannot simply be a silent observer,” Poilievre said. “We have to take a stance that protects our citizens, not just our economy.” Trudeau’s team, on the other hand, insists that the tariffs are a measured response aimed at addressing systemic trade imbalances rather than a punitive stance.

Looking ahead

With Parliament now back in session, the House of Commons is poised for a series of debates on trade policy, tariffs, and broader economic strategy. While the government's current stance remains firm, the opposition’s push for a recalibration of the tariffs underscores a growing divide over Canada’s trade policy direction.

The coming weeks will see a range of questions from MPs—including inquiries about how the tariffs will affect consumers, the automotive industry, and Canadian exporters—followed by potential amendments and even a vote on the tariff bill. The outcome will likely set the tone for Canada’s trade relations with China and its position in the global market.

As the House continues to deliberate, the policy of tariffs will remain at the center of a conversation that balances national security, economic competitiveness, and the welfare of Canadian workers and consumers. The debate highlights the very real complexity of modern trade relations and the political stakes of protecting domestic industries in an increasingly interconnected world.