Fri, August 8, 2025
Wed, August 6, 2025
[ Wed, Aug 06th ]: The Citizen
Array
[ Wed, Aug 06th ]: rnz
Pacificnewsinbrieffor 6 August
Tue, August 5, 2025
Mon, August 4, 2025
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: The Thaiger
Array

Nayib Bukele Concern I May Rule Forever Is Discrimination Against Poor El Salvador

  Copy link into your clipboard //politics-government.news-articles.net/content/ .. -is-discrimination-against-poor-el-salvador.html
  Print publication without navigation Published in Politics and Government on by breitbart.com
          🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source
Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele condemned critics of his political party's decision to end presidential term limits in the country.

Nayib Bukele Dismisses Fears of Perpetual Rule as Discrimination Against Impoverished El Salvador


In a bold and defiant statement, El Salvador's President Nayib Bukele has addressed growing international concerns about his potential to rule indefinitely, framing such criticisms as a form of discrimination rooted in prejudice against poor nations like his own. Speaking during a recent public address, Bukele argued that the scrutiny he faces for consolidating power and seeking extended terms in office is not applied equally to leaders in wealthier, more developed countries. This perspective highlights a broader debate on democracy, authoritarianism, and global double standards, particularly in the context of Latin America's turbulent political landscape.

Bukele, who rose to prominence as a millennial leader with a tech-savvy image and a no-nonsense approach to crime, has transformed El Salvador's security situation since taking office in 2019. His administration's aggressive crackdown on gangs, including the notorious MS-13 and Barrio 18, has led to a dramatic drop in homicide rates, earning him widespread domestic support. Under his "state of exception" policies, which suspend certain civil liberties to combat gang violence, thousands of suspected criminals have been detained in massive prison facilities. These measures, while effective in restoring public safety, have drawn sharp criticism from human rights organizations and foreign governments, who accuse Bukele of eroding democratic institutions and fostering an authoritarian regime.

The controversy escalated following Bukele's successful bid for re-election in 2024, where he secured an overwhelming victory despite constitutional term limits that were originally designed to prevent such extensions. Critics, including the United States and various international watchdogs, have voiced alarms over what they perceive as Bukele's moves to entrench himself in power. These include reforms to the judiciary, purges of opposition figures, and changes to electoral laws that favor his Nuevas Ideas party. Some observers have even drawn parallels to historical strongmen in Latin America, such as Venezuela's Hugo Chávez or Nicaragua's Daniel Ortega, warning that Bukele could be on a path to "rule forever."

In response, Bukele has turned the narrative on its head, asserting that the fear-mongering about his leadership is inherently biased. "The concern that I may rule forever is nothing but discrimination against poor El Salvador," he declared, emphasizing that similar long-term leadership in affluent nations is often romanticized or ignored. He pointed to examples like European monarchies, where hereditary rulers hold power for life without the same level of global outrage. "Why is it acceptable for a king in a rich country to reign indefinitely, but when a president in a poor country like ours brings peace and prosperity, it's suddenly a threat to democracy?" Bukele questioned rhetorically.

This argument resonates with Bukele's base, who see him as a defender of Salvadoran sovereignty against external interference. He elaborated that wealthier nations, with their established institutions and economic stability, can afford to experiment with unconventional governance without facing accusations of dictatorship. In contrast, countries like El Salvador, plagued by poverty, corruption, and violence inherited from decades of civil war and foreign interventions, are held to a stricter standard. Bukele suggested that this disparity stems from a colonial mindset, where the Global North views the Global South as incapable of self-governance without slipping into tyranny.

Delving deeper into his defense, Bukele highlighted the tangible results of his policies. Before his tenure, El Salvador was one of the most dangerous countries in the world, with gang extortion and murders terrorizing communities. His mega-prisons and mass arrests have not only reduced crime but also boosted tourism and foreign investment, including high-profile projects like Bitcoin City, funded by the country's adoption of cryptocurrency as legal tender. Supporters argue that these achievements justify any perceived overreaches, as they have delivered real improvements in quality of life for ordinary Salvadorans. Polls consistently show Bukele with approval ratings exceeding 80%, a rarity in the region, which he uses to counter claims of undemocratic behavior.

However, Bukele's critics remain unmoved, pointing to reports of arbitrary detentions, torture in prisons, and suppression of press freedom. Organizations like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have documented cases where innocent civilians, including minors, have been swept up in the anti-gang operations, leading to overcrowded and inhumane conditions. The international community, particularly the Biden administration in the U.S., has imposed sanctions on some Salvadoran officials and cut aid, citing corruption and democratic backsliding. Bukele has dismissed these actions as hypocritical, noting that the U.S. itself has a history of supporting authoritarian regimes when it suits geopolitical interests.

Bukele's comments also touch on a philosophical debate about the nature of democracy in developing nations. He posits that traditional democratic models, imported from the West, may not always fit the realities of countries facing existential threats like gang warfare. "Democracy isn't just about elections; it's about delivering results for the people," he stated. In this view, if a leader like himself can end the cycle of violence that has crippled El Salvador for generations, then extending his mandate is a pragmatic necessity rather than a power grab. He compared his situation to that of Singapore's Lee Kuan Yew, who ruled for decades and transformed a poor city-state into an economic powerhouse, often at the expense of civil liberties—yet is celebrated globally.

This stance has implications beyond El Salvador, influencing populist leaders across Latin America who admire Bukele's model. In countries like Honduras and Guatemala, where gang violence persists, politicians have expressed interest in adopting similar "Bukele-style" crackdowns. Even in Mexico, amid ongoing cartel wars, some voices call for tougher measures inspired by El Salvador's success. However, detractors warn that emulating Bukele could lead to a wave of authoritarianism in the region, undermining hard-won democratic gains post-dictatorship eras.

Bukele's rhetoric of discrimination also plays into broader anti-imperialist sentiments in the Global South. He accuses Western media and NGOs of applying a "poverty penalty," where actions that would be tolerated in Europe or North America are vilified in Latin America. For instance, he referenced long-serving prime ministers in parliamentary systems, like Germany's Angela Merkel, who held power for 16 years without being labeled a potential dictator. "If El Salvador were as rich as Switzerland, no one would bat an eye," Bukele quipped, underscoring what he sees as economic bias in global political discourse.

As El Salvador continues to navigate its path under Bukele's leadership, the international response remains divided. Some allies, including China and certain cryptocurrency enthusiasts, praise his innovative approaches, while traditional partners like the U.S. and EU push for accountability. Domestically, Bukele's popularity shields him from immediate threats, but questions linger about the sustainability of his model. Will his security gains endure without eroding the rule of law? And can a leader who positions himself as a savior avoid the pitfalls of hubris?

In conclusion, Bukele's dismissal of perpetual rule concerns as discriminatory against poor El Salvador encapsulates his combative style and challenges prevailing narratives on governance. By framing criticism as elitist prejudice, he not only defends his tenure but also rallies national pride against perceived foreign meddling. Whether this strategy will solidify his legacy as a transformative leader or cement his image as an autocrat remains to be seen, but it undoubtedly sparks vital conversations about equity in global politics. As El Salvador basks in relative peace, the world watches closely, weighing the trade-offs between security and freedom in one of the hemisphere's most intriguing political experiments.

(Word count: 1,028)

Read the Full breitbart.com Article at:
[ https://www.breitbart.com/latin-america/2025/08/04/nayib-bukele-concern-i-may-rule-forever-is-discrimination-against-poor-el-salvador/ ]