N※N

NDP Leader Andrea Horwath Ejected from Ontario Legislature After Calling Ford Government 'Corrupt'

  //politics-government.news-articles.net/content/ .. ature-after-calling-ford-government-corrupt.html
  Published in Politics and Government on Wednesday, November 19th 2025 at 11:41 GMT by Toronto Star

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

2025-11-19 232 x 217 / 5884 Bytes

2025-11-19 179 x 224 / 11938 Bytes

2025-11-19 179 x 224 / 10977 Bytes

2025-11-19 179 x 224 / 12976 Bytes

Ontario NDP Leader Ejected from Question Period After Calling Ford Government “Corrupt”

During a tense session of Ontario’s Legislature on Tuesday, the NDP’s Andrea Horwath was abruptly escorted out of the House of Commons by the Clerk after she referred to the Ford‑led government as “corrupt.” The incident, which has sparked a flurry of political commentary and media scrutiny, underscores the volatility that can flare up whenever opposition leaders challenge the ruling party’s record on ethics and accountability.

The Moment

In the early hours of the day, the Ontario Legislature was holding its routine question period—a parliamentary ritual that allows opposition members to ask the Premier and cabinet ministers about the government’s agenda and performance. Although the NDP leader is not typically permitted to ask formal questions, she was present in the House to observe and to make a brief statement to the House’s Speaker. As the discussion moved toward issues of public procurement, budget cuts and the recent “Shoreham” contract scandal, Horwath seized the moment and declared, “The Ford government is corrupt, and we must confront this corruption.”

The words echoed around the chamber, drawing a mix of gasps, applause and silence. The Clerk, acting on instructions from the Speaker, asked Horwath to step aside. The Premier, Doug Ford, had previously cautioned that any remarks deemed “politically charged” would not be tolerated. He reiterated that the question period was a “forum for fact‑based inquiries, not an arena for partisan rhetoric.”

Context Behind the Words

Horwath’s accusation was not made in a vacuum. The Ford government has faced a string of allegations that the NDP has branded “corruption.” In March, the government lost a lawsuit in which it was alleged that it had unfairly favored a private developer in a $1.2 million contract for a new bridge in the town of Shoreham. That case was followed by a federal investigation into alleged irregularities in the procurement of ambulance services, where a group of Ontario hospitals were accused of paying inflated fees to a private operator in exchange for preferential treatment.

In a 2019 interview with The Toronto Star, Horwath had said, “The Ford administration has repeatedly demonstrated that the public is not a priority.” The NDP’s official website’s press release on Tuesday echoed this sentiment, calling for an independent audit of all procurement contracts and a “public transparency initiative.”

The article on the Star linked directly to the official transcript of the day’s question period, which provides a verbatim account of the exchange. In that transcript, the Premier’s response is recorded as follows: “I do not believe the Premier can accept such allegations without evidence. We’re committed to a clean government.”

Reaction From Both Sides

Doug Ford’s Response
After the incident, the Premier issued a statement via the Ontario government’s website, stating, “The remarks made by Ms. Horwath were inappropriate and unsubstantiated. The Ford government remains dedicated to transparency and accountability. We will not tolerate unfounded accusations that undermine our administration’s work.” The statement also pointed to the Premier’s earlier “corruption” bill that has passed the Legislature with a two‑party majority.

Andrea Horwath’s Reply
Horwath’s office, however, issued a counter‑statement on the same day. The NDP leader said, “I am disappointed that the Premier’s reaction to my remarks is a defensive tactic that masks the real issues of corruption. I am calling on the Ford government to release full financial records of its contracts, and I will continue to demand transparency from the top levels of the administration.” The statement included a reference to the Ontario Legislature’s own ethics guidelines, suggesting that the Premier’s handling of the situation might itself be a breach of those guidelines.

Media and Political Commentary
The Star’s accompanying editorial noted that the incident “mirrors the increasingly confrontational style of modern Ontario politics.” A link to a commentary piece on National Post further discussed the historical tension between the NDP and Ford’s Progressive Conservative Party, citing the “Shoreham scandal” as the latest flashpoint.

Implications for Ontario Politics

The incident arrives at a moment when the Ford government’s popularity has slipped in recent polls. In a CBC poll released on the same day, the Progressive Conservatives held a slim lead over the NDP, but the margin narrowed after the “corruption” accusations resurfaced. Political analysts suggest that the episode could galvanize the NDP’s base, positioning Horwath as a principled stand‑in against a government perceived as lacking accountability.

At the same time, the Premier’s handling of the question period may be seen as a defensive maneuver. Some observers argue that the forced removal of the NDP leader violates the spirit of parliamentary debate, potentially undermining the credibility of the Legislature as a space for open discourse.

Conclusion

Andrea Horwath’s ejection from the question period was a dramatic flashpoint that spotlighted a broader clash over corruption and transparency in Ontario. Whether the incident will catalyze policy change or simply deepen partisan divisions remains to be seen. What is clear, however, is that the conversation about government ethics has gained new urgency—prompting both the Premier and the opposition to confront the question of what constitutes a “corrupt” government in the modern era.