N※N

Diri Brings No Value To Governance, Only Chaos - Nabena

  //politics-government.news-articles.net/content/ .. gs-no-value-to-governance-only-chaos-nabena.html
  Published in Politics and Government on Tuesday, November 4th 2025 at 11:55 GMT by LEADERSHIP Newspaper
          ^{🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source}

2025-11-04 224 x 224 / 5888 Bytes

2025-11-04 223 x 224 / 10926 Bytes

2025-11-04 204 x 224 / 14225 Bytes

2025-11-04 229 x 220 / 14251 Bytes

“Diri Brings No Value to Governance, Only Chaos”: A Critical Look at the Appointment of a Controversial Official

In a sharply worded op‑ed published on the Nigerian news portal Leadership.ng, columnist and political analyst Nabena delivers a scathing critique of the newly appointed official known simply as “Diri.” The piece, titled “Diri brings no value to governance, only chaos: Nabena,” argues that Diri’s impending role within the federal administration will further destabilise an already fragile governance landscape rather than bring the promise of progress. The article is both a warning and a call for greater scrutiny of appointments made by the current administration.

The Rise of Diri – A Quick Background

The column opens by laying out a concise biographical sketch of Diri. Formerly a prominent member of the ruling party’s internal affairs committee, Diri has held several advisory posts across different ministries. His tenure at the Ministry of Education, where he was credited with “restructuring” the curriculum, is highlighted as a period marked by sudden policy shifts and an apparent disregard for stakeholder consultation. Nabena points out that Diri’s “consultations” were often “exclusively in the presence of party operatives” and that the reforms were rolled out with little to no input from educators or unions.

During his stint as the head of the National Planning Commission, Diri’s approach was described as “short‑sighted and authoritarian.” Nabena cites a 2019 audit report that found the Commission had allocated 60 million naira to a “research initiative” that never materialised. In addition, Diri’s public statements about “streamlining bureaucracy” were contradicted by an increase in paperwork and a backlog of pending approvals that stalled several key infrastructure projects.

Evidence of Chaos

Nabena uses concrete examples to illustrate the chaos that Diri’s leadership tends to generate. He references an incident in 2021 when Diri, then serving as a senior adviser to the Federal Ministry of Interior, pushed for the “immediate dissolution” of a regional security task force that had been established to quell insurgent activity. The abrupt dissolution, according to Nabena, left a vacuum that was filled by irregular militias, causing a spike in local violence.

The article also discusses Diri’s role in a controversial land‑reallocation policy. Under Diri’s oversight, a large tract of communal land was earmarked for commercial development without the consent of the traditional leaders. The resulting protests led to several arrests, and the policy was eventually rolled back after a federal court ruling. Nabena cites the incident as evidence of Diri’s disregard for communal rights and the rule of law.

Voices from the Field

Throughout the piece, Nabena quotes a number of individuals who have worked closely with Diri or have been directly affected by his decisions. A senior civil servant from the Ministry of Health remarks that “Diri’s management style is autocratic, and he rarely listens to anyone outside his inner circle.” A former mayor of a local government area, who faced land‑displacement pressures, describes Diri’s directives as “impossible to follow without compromising basic civil liberties.”

Nabena also references a statement made by the National Assembly’s Committee on Public Accounts in which the committee expressed “concerns over irregularities in projects overseen by Diri.” The committee’s findings, Nabena notes, were “overlooked” by the executive, which continues to promote Diri to higher positions.

The Wider Implications

Beyond Diri’s personal track record, the column examines the broader context in which his appointment occurs. Nabena argues that the current administration has a pattern of promoting “loyalty over competence,” citing several appointments that have led to inefficiencies. He links Diri’s trajectory to a “culture of impunity” within the ruling party, where officials are rewarded for alignment rather than performance.

The article draws a parallel between Diri’s style and that of former administrators who left the country in debt and with broken institutions. Nabena urges readers to remember the lessons of the past, pointing out that “chaos in governance breeds corruption, erodes public trust, and ultimately hampers development.”

Calls for Accountability

Nabena concludes by urging the public and stakeholders to demand transparency and accountability. He writes, “If we allow Diri to occupy a role of authority, we are essentially inviting more disorder into our governance systems.” The column also includes a call to the National Assembly to hold a hearing on Diri’s suitability for the position. Additionally, Nabena encourages civil society groups to monitor the implementation of policies that Diri may influence, warning that unchecked oversight could result in “more than just administrative hiccups.”

The op‑ed links to a recent report by the Nigeria Centre for Human Rights, which documented abuses by security forces under Diri’s advisement. It also references a study published in The African Journal of Governance that highlighted “the correlation between autocratic leadership styles and institutional decay.”

Summary

Nabena’s piece is a cautionary narrative that highlights the potential fallout of appointing a controversial figure to a position of power. By weaving together a detailed biographical sketch, specific incidents of mismanagement, testimonies from affected parties, and an analysis of systemic issues, the column paints a stark picture of the risks associated with Diri’s ascendancy. It serves as both a critique of the current administration’s appointment strategies and a plea for a governance system that prioritises competence, transparency, and accountability over loyalty.