N※N

Political Approach to Corruption Has Failed Ghana - Akyem Muo Chief Calls for Radical Reform

  //politics-government.news-articles.net/content/ .. na-akyem-muo-chief-calls-for-radical-reform.html
  Published in Politics and Government on Monday, November 17th 2025 at 9:20 GMT by Ghanaweb.com

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

2025-11-17 249 x 203 / 10693 Bytes

2025-11-17 193 x 224 / 11262 Bytes

2025-11-17 179 x 224 / 13661 Bytes

2025-11-13 187 x 224 / 12867 Bytes

Political Approach to Corruption Has Failed Ghana – Akyem Muo Chief Weighs In

Published by GhanaWeb – News Archive

In a striking editorial published on the GhanaWeb news portal, the chief of the Akyem Muo traditional area—Dr. B. K. Mensah‑Kofi—expressed his frustration with what he describes as the “political approach to corruption has failed Ghana.” The article, which runs in the news archive and is accompanied by a number of hyperlinks to related investigative pieces, calls for a fundamental shift in how corruption is addressed in the country. Below is a comprehensive summary of the chief’s key arguments, the evidence he cites, and the broader context that frames his critique.

1. The Political Narrative on Corruption

The chief opens by acknowledging that the issue of corruption has been a headline staple in Ghanaian politics for decades. He points out that successive governments have introduced a series of anti‑corruption laws, established the Anti‑Corruption Unit (ACU), and set up the Commission on Human Rights and Administrative Justice (CHRAJ). Yet, as the article explains, these measures have yielded only “measured improvements” that fail to tackle the systemic nature of the problem.

He writes, “We have watched politicians swear by the ACU and CHRAJ, but the same political leaders who sign the bills later become the very ones investigated for graft.” The chief uses this observation to underscore a recurring paradox: corruption persists when the very people in power wield the instruments meant to police it.

2. The Role of Traditional Authorities

Dr. Mensah‑Kofi draws attention to the unique position of traditional authorities in Ghana’s socio‑political landscape. While politicians occupy formal office, chiefs and queen‑makers wield deep community influence and are often the last line of defense against local corruption. The chief recounts how his people have witnessed “money misappropriated from community projects, public office rentals, and even the abuse of state resources for personal gain.”

The article cites several concrete examples—although it does not name specific politicians—to illustrate how community projects that were supposed to fund schools or health centres ended up in the pockets of corrupt officials. He also highlights the lack of accountability mechanisms that allow local leaders to check the misuse of public funds.

3. Political Incentives for Corruption

The chief argues that the very incentives built into the political system encourage corrupt behaviour. He explains that politicians often rely on “donor money, election subsidies, and party resources that, if mismanaged, can become a source of illicit enrichment.” The article links to a related GhanaWeb piece that details the “P4M” (Private‑Public Partnership for Infrastructure) scandal, where a consortium was found to have over‑billed the government by millions of cedis. The chief uses this case to illustrate how large‑scale corruption can occur within a political framework that rewards short‑term project success over long‑term transparency.

He also discusses the “political patronage” system, wherein “political bosses distribute benefits to loyalists” in exchange for votes. The article points out that such patronage is often financed through illicit funds, further eroding public trust.

4. Structural Weaknesses in Ghana’s Anti‑Corruption Regime

The chief critiques the design of Ghana’s anti‑corruption institutions. While acknowledging that the ACU and CHRAJ have produced some high‑profile convictions, he insists that they are undermined by political interference. He points to the appointment of ACU leadership by the President, which, he claims, creates a perception of partiality. He further highlights the slow pace of investigations, citing the example of the “Murder of Ghanaian Journalist” case, in which the probe dragged on for over a year before any meaningful action was taken.

He links to another GhanaWeb article that covers the “NPP‑MDC corruption allegations” of 2023, underscoring how accusations often disappear without legal consequence when they involve senior members of the ruling party. This, according to the chief, creates a “two‑tiered” justice system.

5. Call for a Paradigm Shift

In the closing paragraphs, Dr. Mensah‑Kofi makes a passionate plea for a new approach that moves beyond legalistic frameworks to address the underlying cultural and political dynamics of corruption. His proposals include:

1. Decentralizing anti‑corruption oversight – Empowering local councils and traditional authorities to audit and supervise public projects.
2. Strengthening whistleblower protections – Ensuring that individuals who expose wrongdoing can do so safely and without fear of retaliation.
3. Embedding ethics education in schools – Cultivating a culture of integrity from a young age.
4. Increasing civic participation – Encouraging citizen watchdog groups to monitor elections, public spending, and the conduct of elected officials.
5. Reforming political financing – Making campaign contributions transparent and limiting the influence of “soft money” in politics.

He stresses that these changes require both top‑down commitment from national leaders and bottom‑up momentum from civil society and traditional institutions.

6. Broader Context and Comparative Insights

The article also draws on comparative examples from other African nations. By linking to a GhanaWeb feature on Rwanda’s “Anti‑Corruption Office” and to an African Union report on corruption trends, the chief suggests that a “one‑size‑fits‑all” approach is unlikely to succeed. He emphasizes that Ghana’s political culture, deeply rooted in patronage and elite capture, necessitates tailored solutions that reflect local realities.

He concludes by reminding readers that “corruption is a disease, and like any disease, it needs both medicine and a change in the environment that nurtures it.” The chief calls for a renewed partnership between the state, traditional authorities, and the citizenry to re‑engineer the nation’s governance structures.

Key Takeaways

• Persistent political failure: Despite legal reforms, corruption remains entrenched due to political interference and incentives.
• Traditional authorities as watchdogs: Chiefs hold significant influence that can either amplify or mitigate corruption at the community level.
• Structural weaknesses: ACU appointments, slow investigations, and selective accountability undermine anti‑corruption efforts.
• Comprehensive reforms needed: Decentralization, ethics education, whistleblower protection, and transparent financing are crucial.
• Cultural shift: Long‑term change requires societal transformation, not just institutional tweaks.

The article underscores that addressing corruption in Ghana is not merely a matter of passing laws but demands a holistic restructuring of political incentives, community oversight, and civic culture. Dr. Mensah‑Kofi’s editorial serves as a clarion call for stakeholders at every level to re‑evaluate their roles and to commit to the rigorous, sustained reforms necessary to break the cycle of corruption that has, for too long, impeded Ghana’s development.