N※N

Sandro Marcos Rebukes Imee Marcos Over 'Dangerously Irresponsible' Drug Claims

45

  //politics-government.news-articles.net/content/ .. -over-dangerously-irresponsible-drug-claims.html
  Published in Politics and Government on Monday, November 17th 2025 at 18:25 GMT by IBTimes UK

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

2025-11-17 185 x 224 / 11189 Bytes

2025-11-17 224 x 224 / 8201 Bytes

2025-11-17 179 x 224 / 19021 Bytes

2025-11-17 224 x 224 / 9468 Bytes

Sandro Marcos Fires Warning at Imee Marcos Over “Dangerously Irresponsible” Drug Claims

In a rare public showdown within the Marcos political dynasty, Senate President Sandro Marcos struck a trenchant rebuke at his elder sister, Vice President Imee Marcos, after she voiced what he described as “dangerously irresponsible” assertions about the Philippine drug problem. The exchange unfolded in the wake of a recent television interview in which Imee, a key player in the administration’s drug‑war agenda, suggested that the nation’s drug crisis could be largely attributed to “social media influence” and that the government’s approach was “misguided.” Sandro, who has long positioned himself as the Marcos family’s “moderate” voice, used the moment to call for a fact‑based strategy and to warn that misinformation could destabilise an already fragile political climate.

A Background of Drug‑War Controversy

The Philippines has endured a controversial “war on drugs” since President Rodrigo Duterte’s term began in 2016. The campaign, which has drawn international criticism for alleged extrajudicial killings, remains a polarising topic. President Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr., who took office in 2022, has pledged to continue the fight against illicit drugs while adopting a “comprehensive” strategy that includes rehabilitation and community support. However, critics argue that the approach still leans heavily on militaristic tactics and that data on drug‑related incidents remain opaque.

Against this backdrop, Imee Marcos, who serves as the country’s vice‑president and has been vocal about drug‑war policies, delivered a televised briefing on a popular talk show. In her remarks, she pointed to a “wave of misinformation” on social media that, according to her, inflated public fears and led to a “cult‑like” perception of the drug war. She argued that some of the statistics reported by government agencies were “unverified” and that the narrative pushed by international media was “unbalanced.”

Sandro Marcos’s Response

Sandro Marcos, whose tenure as Senate President has already seen him champion anti‑corruption measures and push for greater transparency, took the floor at a press briefing to confront Imee’s comments. “Those remarks are dangerously irresponsible,” he declared, adding that the Vice President’s assertions could “further destabilise the country.” He pointed out that while social media can spread misinformation, it can also serve as a tool for accountability and civic engagement—provided it is used responsibly.

In a tone that suggested more than a casual disagreement, Sandro warned that Imee’s “mischaracterisation of the data” could sow doubt among lawmakers and the public alike. “We must base our policies on evidence, not on unverified claims or sensationalist media,” he insisted. He also accused Imee of “playing politics” by cherry‑picking statistics that fit a particular narrative. “The government’s fight against drugs is not a simple headline story; it is a complex, multifaceted challenge that requires measured, evidence‑based action,” Sandro emphasized.

The Role of “Web Lies” in Philippine Politics

The term “web lies” came up in Sandro’s critique, a phrase that captures the growing concern over digital misinformation. He cited a recent study that documented how social media algorithms can amplify fringe or false narratives about drug use, thereby shaping public perception. Sandro underscored the need for the administration to actively combat misinformation without compromising press freedom or democratic discourse.

The Vice President’s own defense rested on the premise that “misinformation on the drug war is a form of propaganda that can erode public trust.” She argued that the administration’s public outreach should involve clear communication of facts, data, and the underlying reasons for policy decisions. In her words, the government should “explain the data we’re using to make decisions” to dispel doubts and to “prevent a narrative that pits law‑enforcement against civil liberties.”

Sandro countered that the “data” in question were not fabricated but were “misinterpreted” when presented in a sensational context. He pointed to the Department of Justice’s own reports that track drug‑related crimes, noting that “the raw figures are often misread by the public and then amplified by the media.” He urged lawmakers to review the evidence independently, rather than rely on third‑party commentary.

Implications for the Marcos Administration

This intra‑family confrontation is noteworthy because it highlights the internal tensions within the Marcos administration. While President Bongbong Marcos has projected a family‑unity image, the split suggests divergent views on how to handle the drug war. The Senate President’s call for a fact‑based approach may signal a shift toward a more transparent and data‑driven policy, whereas the Vice President’s emphasis on the narrative challenge points to an ongoing struggle to maintain public support.

The disagreement also touches on the broader debate about the role of political leadership in shaping public discourse. Critics of the administration argue that the Marcos family’s close-knit structure allows for a lack of accountability, while supporters contend that familial bonds foster stronger policy cohesion. Sandro’s insistence on “evidence” could be seen as an attempt to introduce a degree of institutional checks and balances that are missing from a purely political narrative.

Follow‑Up Stories and Contextual Links

The IBTimes piece includes links to several related stories that help frame the conversation:

1. “Philippine drug war: The numbers that matter” – A detailed look at the statistical data on drug‑related incidents, offering context for Sandro’s demand for evidence.
2. “Vice President Imee Marcos on the drug war: What she really said” – A transcript of the TV interview, allowing readers to hear the original statements that prompted the backlash.
3. “Social media’s role in shaping public opinion on the drug war” – An analysis of how online platforms influence the public perception of policy issues.

These links deepen the reader’s understanding of the interplay between media narratives, political messaging, and the policy process.

Conclusion

In a country where the drug war has become a touchstone of national debate, Sandro Marcos’s admonition of Vice President Imee Marcos is a bold move that could reshape how the Marcos administration tackles misinformation and policy formulation. By framing her remarks as “dangerously irresponsible,” he foregrounds the importance of evidence over rhetoric and highlights the potential perils of unchecked “web lies.” Whether this public spat will translate into a substantive policy shift remains to be seen, but it underscores a growing appetite—within the highest echelons of Philippine politics—for a more disciplined, data‑driven approach to governance. The incident also serves as a reminder that even within dynastic politics, public accountability and policy integrity are issues that cannot be sidelined.