N※N

SC politicians respond to continued shutdown over including subsidies in spending plan

  //politics-government.news-articles.net/content/ .. n-over-including-subsidies-in-spending-plan.html
  Published in Politics and Government on Thursday, October 16th 2025 at 15:26 GMT by The Greenville News
          ^{🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source}

2025-10-16 300 x 168 / 9806 Bytes

2025-10-16 258 x 195 / 7229 Bytes

2025-10-16 275 x 183 / 8955 Bytes

Federal Shutdown Sends Ripples Through South Carolina Politics

The federal government’s sudden shutdown on October 15 has thrown South Carolina’s political landscape into a flurry of activity. According to a detailed report from The Greenville Online, the impasse over the federal budget has left state officials scrambling to mitigate the fallout for residents, federal employees, and the state’s economic interests.

The shutdown, triggered by a stalemate in Congress over funding for the 2025 fiscal year, halted operations across dozens of federal agencies, many of which are headquartered or have a significant presence in South Carolina. Among the most affected are the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) office in the state’s border town of Orangeburg, the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) local office in Columbia, and the federal court system in Greenville. With CBP workers furloughed, border crossings at the South Carolina-Georgia line have experienced increased delays, prompting concerns over smuggling and illegal immigration.

Governor Henry McMaster quickly weighed in, calling the shutdown “a direct threat to public safety and the economy.” In a press conference, he urged the federal government to reauthorize appropriations and highlighted the potential for a backlog of tax refunds, as the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in Columbia is currently unable to process returns. McMaster’s message echoed that of South Carolina’s congressional delegation, with Senator Lindsey Graham and Representative Nancy Mace both publicly demanding a swift resolution.

At the state level, the South Carolina House of Representatives adopted a resolution condemning the shutdown and calling for a “temporary bridge measure” to protect state workers who rely on federal funding. Meanwhile, the South Carolina Senate introduced a similar motion, with Senator Robert Smith stressing that the shutdown’s impact on state employees—especially those working in federal agencies—cannot be ignored. The resolutions passed by a wide margin, underscoring bipartisan support for a quick fix.

The article also examines how local municipalities have been affected. In Greenville, the city’s mayor, John B. McKinney, announced a temporary shutdown of the city’s traffic signal system due to the lack of federal funding for the Department of Transportation (DOT). The same issue has been echoed in Spartanburg, where the city’s park maintenance crew has been forced to halt work on several projects.

Beyond the immediate operational impacts, the report delves into the economic consequences for South Carolina’s businesses. The shutdown has delayed the processing of federal grants that support small businesses in the state. The state’s Chamber of Commerce released a statement expressing concern over the “unpredictability and uncertainty” caused by the shutdown, warning that the delay could push many businesses into financial distress.

In addition to local concerns, the article links to the official statement from the U.S. Congress, where House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer criticized the Senate’s failure to pass the funding bill. On the Senate side, Majority Leader Chuck Schumer defended the floor, arguing that the delay is “necessary to ensure adequate oversight and accountability.” These statements illustrate the broader partisan divide that has brought the shutdown to light.

The report also provides a historical context, noting that the last major federal shutdown occurred in 2013, which similarly impacted South Carolina’s border security and federal court operations. The authors reference the impact of that shutdown on the state’s economy, citing an estimated $12 million in lost productivity. This comparison is intended to underscore the severity of the current shutdown.

While the report’s focus is on the immediate fallout, it also touches on potential long-term repercussions. The article notes that the South Carolina Department of Commerce has begun drafting a contingency plan to mitigate the effects of extended shutdowns. The plan includes measures such as temporary staff hiring and budget reallocation to protect key state services. This proactive stance is hailed by local business leaders as a “necessary safeguard against future uncertainty.”

The article concludes with a call to action for both state and federal leaders to prioritize a timely resolution. Governor McMaster has pledged to work with federal officials to ensure that South Carolina’s needs are addressed, while Senators Graham and Mace have promised to keep the issue in the public eye until a comprehensive appropriations package is enacted.

In sum, The Greenville Online’s coverage paints a detailed portrait of how a federal shutdown can reverberate through a state’s political, economic, and social structures. It highlights the urgency with which South Carolina’s leaders and citizens are pushing for a resolution that safeguards the well‑being of their communities and the integrity of federal services operating within the state.