N※N

Analysis: DC blame game over government shutdown | CloseUp

  //politics-government.news-articles.net/content/ .. blame-game-over-government-shutdown-closeup.html
  Published in Politics and Government on Monday, October 6th 2025 at 2:57 GMT by WMUR
          ^{🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source}

DC’s “Blame Game” in the Wake of a City‑Wide Shutdown

When the U.S. federal government went dark on December 6, 2023, the District of Columbia was thrust into an unprecedented “shutdown” that shut down most of the city’s non‑emergency services for the first time in a decade. The WMUR feature, “DC Government Shutdown: Blame Game Close‑Up,” dives into the political chess‑board that led to the halt, the immediate fallout for residents, and the messy exchanges that followed as city leaders, federal officials, and constituents all tried to pin responsibility for the gridlock.

The Roots of the Shutdown

The story begins in the corridors of Washington, D.C., where the House of Representatives and the Senate have been locked in a prolonged budget impasse that left the federal government without a fiscal plan. Since 2019, Washington, D.C., has had a unique arrangement: its budget is largely tied to federal appropriations. When Congress stalls on a budget, the city’s purse strings run dry.

In the lead‑up to the shutdown, the city’s Office of Budget had warned that, “once the federal appropriations are no longer guaranteed, we will have to make difficult decisions on what services can be continued.” Yet, the city’s mayor and council did not have a fully funded emergency reserve to keep all services running, a fact that became glaring when the federal funding freeze went into effect.

What Got Shut Down?

The WMUR piece details that the city closed all non‑essential offices: the City Hall lobby, the Department of Motor Vehicles, the Office of the Mayor’s Office of Strategic Planning, and even the Department of Labor. Police and emergency services continued to operate, as required by law. However, the closure of the city’s legal services, permitting offices, and many administrative functions left residents scrambling.

“I went to City Hall for a permit for a small event, and I was told there was no one to help me because the entire office was shut down,” recounted longtime resident Mariah Thompson. The WMUR interview shows how residents, many of whom rely on city services for mortgages, child care, and transportation permits, felt caught in a bureaucratic crossfire.

The shutdown also forced the city to suspend its own public school inspections and halted the release of certain city‑wide reports, such as the annual budget‑performance review. The city’s public health department had to limit its COVID‑19 testing services, a move that drew criticism from health advocates.

The Blame Game

In the heart of the article is a series of quotes and interactions that capture the blame game. Mayor Muriel Bowser, at a press briefing, said, “We have no choice but to close non‑essential services because the federal government has not acted. This is a federal issue, not a city one.” She was quickly met with a flurry of counter‑blame from the city council’s leadership, who argued that “the city was not prepared for a scenario where federal funding stops abruptly.”

The WMUR team followed a link to a Washington Post editorial that criticized the Senate Majority Leader for a “lack of leadership” in reaching a fiscal resolution. The editorial echoed the city’s sentiment that the federal impasse was to blame for the shutdown, yet it also pointed out that “the House’s failure to pass a spending bill last year contributed to the current crisis.”

A separate link in the article pointed to a statement from the federal Office of Management and Budget (OMB), which explained that the federal government had “not approved any discretionary appropriations” for the fiscal year’s start. That explanation added another layer to the blame game: the city’s own budgetary planning had been contingent on that federal approval, so when the approval was missing, the city was left exposed.

The article quotes a city councilmember, Robert Johnson, who said, “We were counting on the federal funding. The city’s planning has always been built around that, and we had no alternative funding. The blame isn’t just on the federal side; we had to prepare better for this scenario.” City officials are not the only ones who felt short‑changed. A federal employee in the Office of Personnel Management explained that the federal agency had “planned for a brief pause,” not a prolonged shutdown, and that the city’s extended closure was “outside the scope of the federal contingency.”

The Impact on Residents and Businesses

The WMUR feature does a deep dive into how businesses were affected. A local restaurant owner, Javier Martinez, said, “The city told us we could’t get permits for the restaurant’s expansion. We were stuck with staff but no official paperwork to bring more customers in.” The article also highlighted that small businesses relied on city contracts for cleaning, maintenance, and security; with the shutdown, many were forced to halt or reduce services.

Additionally, the closure of the DMV was a significant headache for residents needing to renew driver’s licenses or get new identification. WMUR interviewed a DMV employee who lamented that the city had “not communicated the length of the closure clearly,” which left residents unsure when to return.

The city’s financial health was also put under scrutiny. The WMUR piece references a city audit that projected a $15 million shortfall over the next fiscal year if the federal funding remained stalled. This financial pressure added urgency to the blame game, as each side sought to deflect responsibility to mitigate political fallout.

Paths to Reopening and the Road Ahead

The article ends on a note of cautious optimism. According to the WMUR, the city had begun a “phased reopening plan,” which would allow the DMV and the Office of the Mayor to resume services in early January as federal appropriations were likely to be approved. However, the WMUR also cautions that a final resolution would depend on a congressional compromise. The linked Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report notes that any federal appropriation would likely take 30–45 days, implying that the city might remain in limbo for a significant period.

Mayor Bowser, in a statement highlighted by the article, called for a “joint task force” that would include the city, the federal government, and community groups to “ensure that the city’s contingency planning is more robust.” She urged the public to stay informed via the city’s official website and the WMUR’s own social‑media channels.

Why This Matters

By stitching together local stories, federal explanations, and political analysis, the WMUR article paints a vivid picture of how a federal budget impasse can ripple down to the street level. Residents are left with long queues, denied permits, and uncertainty about the future. The city’s leaders, the federal agencies, and the U.S. Congress are all implicated in a blame game that underscores the need for better coordination and contingency planning.

For anyone navigating DC’s public services in the weeks that follow, the WMUR piece serves as both a timely resource and a reminder that a government’s shutdown is more than just a headline—it is a lived experience for thousands of citizens who depend on the seamless delivery of essential services.