Liberhan Commission Report: A Legacy of Communal Challenges

  //politics-government.news-articles.net/content/ .. sion-report-a-legacy-of-communal-challenges.html
  Published in Politics and Government on Saturday, February 7th 2026 at 15:31 GMT by moneycontrol.com
      Locales: Uttar Pradesh, Delhi, Maharashtra, INDIA

The Legacy of Dust and Stone: Examining the Liberhan Commission, the Babri Masjid Demolition, and India's Enduring Communal Challenges

It is now February 7th, 2026. Two decades after the Supreme Court's 2019 verdict on the Ayodhya dispute, and seventeen years after its final submission, the Liberhan Commission remains a towering, if often overlooked, monument to the complexities of Indian history and the fragility of its secular fabric. The report, born from the ashes of the Babri Masjid's demolition on December 6th, 1992, wasn't simply an investigation into a single act of destruction; it was an autopsy of a nation grappling with burgeoning communalism, political opportunism, and systemic failures.

The demolition itself, a horrifying spectacle broadcast across the nation, was not a spontaneous outburst of religious fervor. As painstakingly detailed in the Liberhan Commission report, it was the culmination of a carefully orchestrated campaign, spearheaded by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and its then-leaders, Lal Krishna Advani and Murli Manohar Joshi. Their Ram Janmabhoomi movement, while framed as a righteous reclamation of a sacred site, demonstrably served as a powerful tool for mobilizing political support and consolidating a Hindu nationalist base.

The Commission, led by Justice Manmohan Singh Liberhan, spent an unprecedented seventeen years dissecting the events leading up to the demolition. This extended timeframe, often criticized, allowed for an unusually comprehensive examination of testimonies, evidence, and political machinations. The report didn't shy away from naming names, directly implicating Advani and Joshi for inciting the destruction. It wasn't merely a case of failing to prevent the demolition, the Commission argued, but of actively encouraging it through inflammatory rhetoric and deliberate actions. The findings underscored a calculated strategy to exploit religious sentiment for political gain.

Beyond the direct instigators, the Liberhan Commission also cast a critical eye on the failures of the Uttar Pradesh state government, led by Kalyan Singh. The report highlighted the administration's deliberate inaction, despite ample warnings of impending violence. Singh's government, perceived as sympathetic to the BJP's agenda, demonstrably failed to provide adequate security or take preventative measures. This negligence, the Commission concluded, effectively enabled the demolition to proceed unchecked. The complicity, whether by action or omission, raised serious questions about the integrity of those entrusted with upholding law and order.

The police and administrative machinery also faced scathing criticism for their lack of preparedness and their inability to control the mob. The report suggested a systemic breakdown in governance, fueled by political interference and a lack of professional accountability. This failure to maintain order wasn't simply a matter of inadequate resources; it was a consequence of a deeply ingrained bias and a willingness to turn a blind eye to the escalating tensions.

The political fallout from the Liberhan Commission report was immense. While the findings initially triggered outrage and calls for accountability, the subsequent legal proceedings faced endless delays and challenges. This prolonged legal battle, compounded by political maneuvering, allowed many of those implicated to avoid meaningful consequences. The report served as a catalyst for shifting the national narrative, forcing a reckoning with the issue of communalism and its impact on Indian politics. However, the slow pace of justice only exacerbated the sense of impunity and eroded public trust in the legal system.

The 2019 Supreme Court verdict, awarding the land for the construction of a Ram Temple, while ostensibly resolving the title dispute, didn't fully address the underlying issues highlighted by the Liberhan Commission. While the allocation of land for a mosque was a positive step, it did little to heal the deep wounds inflicted by decades of communal polarization. In many ways, the verdict felt more like a political compromise than a genuine judicial resolution.

Today, as India navigates an increasingly polarized political landscape, the lessons of the Liberhan Commission remain more relevant than ever. The report serves as a stark reminder of the dangers of religious extremism, the importance of responsible leadership, and the need for a robust and impartial legal system. It is a cautionary tale about the fragility of communal harmony and the enduring challenges facing India's secular democracy. The 'dust and stone' of Ayodhya continue to represent a complex and painful chapter in India's history, one that demands continuous scrutiny and critical reflection.