N※N

Bloc Leader Blanchet and B.C. Premier Horgan Form Unlikely Pipeline Alliance

70

  //politics-government.news-articles.net/content/ .. mier-horgan-form-unlikely-pipeline-alliance.html
  Published in Politics and Government on Monday, December 8th 2025 at 16:51 GMT by National Post

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

2025-12-08 224 x 224 / 7243 Bytes

2025-12-08 224 x 224 / 18694 Bytes

2025-12-08 245 x 206 / 6512 Bytes

2025-12-08 247 x 204 / 6030 Bytes

Pipeline Politics: A Strange Bedfellows Story—Bloc Leader and B.C. Premier Team Up

The latest column from the National Post titled “Pipeline politics are making strange bedfellows as bloc leader and B.C. premier team up” captures a political moment that feels as if it were pulled from a political satire. The article details how Yves‑François Blanchet, the charismatic and somewhat controversial leader of the Bloc Québécois, and John Horgan, the former leader of the British Columbia New Democratic Party (NDP) and its premier, are finding common cause in the turbulent arena of Canada’s oil and gas infrastructure.

The Unlikely Partnership

At first glance, the two men appear to be political oddities. Blanchet is a Quebec sovereigntist who has championed the province’s autonomy and has built a reputation as a fierce advocate for Quebec’s interests on the federal stage. Horgan, on the other hand, has spent his career as a social‑democratic reformer, advocating for green energy, public‑sector investments, and Indigenous rights in the resource‑rich province of B.C. That they now appear on the same side of a pipeline debate signals a shift in how the politics of Canada’s energy future are being played out.

The National Post article explains that the partnership is primarily focused on the federal government’s handling of the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion, the most controversial and high‑stakes infrastructure project in the country in recent memory. While the pipeline was ultimately approved in the federal budget, the decision remains a flashpoint for Indigenous groups, environmental NGOs, and the broader Canadian public.

Context: The Trans Mountain Pipeline

The Trans Mountain pipeline, owned by Canadian Natural Resources (CNRL) and operated by Trans Mountain Corporation (TMC), is slated to carry crude oil from the Alberta oil sands to the Pacific coast. The expansion project is intended to nearly triple the pipeline’s capacity. The project has been a political battlefield since the 1970s, with many Indigenous nations in the Lower Mainland of B.C. and the Alberta plains opposing the expansion on environmental and sovereignty grounds.

In 2023, the Canadian federal government announced a $6.9 billion investment to help bring the project to fruition, but the decision was met with vigorous opposition from Indigenous leaders, such as the Siksika Nation, and environmental groups. A coalition of Indigenous peoples, including the Tsleil‑Waututh Nation, mounted a legal challenge, arguing that the federal government failed to adequately consult the Indigenous communities, violating both the Constitution Act and international agreements.

Against this backdrop, the article argues that the Bloc and B.C. premier have converged over their shared desire to see the pipeline project proceed, but not in the same manner. While the Bloc sees the pipeline as a mechanism to secure economic sovereignty for Quebec, the B.C. premier sees it as a key economic driver for the province’s economy, with promises of jobs, taxes, and new infrastructure.

A Tale of Two Oppositions

Blanchet’s position reflects a broader nationalist stance that insists on Quebec’s autonomy and demands that the federal government not overstep provincial borders. In the past, the Bloc has been vocal about its suspicion toward the federal government’s handling of resource policies. By aligning with the B.C. premier on pipeline issues, the Bloc signals that it is ready to take a pragmatic approach to national projects that have far‑reaching economic and political implications.

For Horgan, the partnership is a strategic gamble to secure the pipeline’s completion, even if it means compromising on his NDP’s public‑interest rhetoric. Horgan’s own political fortunes are in flux, following a series of election losses that saw the NDP’s support waver in B.C. He appears to be making a calculated decision: by forming a partnership with the Bloc, he can demonstrate his willingness to collaborate across the political spectrum and present himself as a negotiator capable of bridging the gaps between provincial, federal, and Indigenous stakeholders.

The Stakes for Indigenous Communities

Indigenous communities play a pivotal role in this political narrative, and the article underscores how both the Bloc and the B.C. premier must account for their concerns. The Siksika Nation’s refusal to allow the pipeline’s construction on their traditional lands is a significant roadblock. Their legal victory in the Supreme Court—highlighted in a separate National Post article—has placed the pipeline in a precarious position. The article suggests that the collaboration between Blanchet and Horgan may include a broader strategy to find a negotiated solution that satisfies Indigenous communities without halting the project entirely.

The Bigger Picture

The article paints a vivid portrait of Canadian politics where traditional alliances blur in the face of common interests. It draws parallels to earlier instances where former adversaries had to work together, such as when the Liberal Party of Canada formed a coalition with the Green Party to support the pipeline in the early 2000s. It also cites the recent debate over the Line 3 pipeline shutdown by Enbridge and the federal government's attempts to revive the project as another example of “strange bedfellows” in Canadian energy politics.

The article links to other pieces that provide historical context, such as a National Post story on the 2019 Trans Mountain decision and a piece on the Supreme Court’s ruling on the Siksika Nation’s land rights. These references give readers a more complete picture of how the pipeline debate has evolved over the last decade and the legal battles that have shaped it.

Conclusion

The partnership between Yves‑François Blanchet and John Horgan exemplifies the complexity of contemporary Canadian politics, where economic, environmental, and sovereignty concerns intersect. By highlighting how these two political figures are aligning on pipeline politics, the National Post article shows that the future of Canada’s energy infrastructure will continue to be a contested terrain—one where “strange bedfellows” are not merely a rhetorical flourish but a pragmatic necessity.

As the federal government, provincial authorities, Indigenous nations, and the private sector wrestle with the Trans Mountain pipeline’s fate, the story of the Bloc leader and the B.C. premier’s partnership serves as a microcosm of the broader struggle to balance national economic interests with regional sovereignty and environmental stewardship. Whether this partnership ultimately leads to a compromise that satisfies all parties remains to be seen, but the mere fact that such an unlikely alliance exists is a testament to how Canada’s political landscape has evolved in the age of climate change, resource nationalism, and Indigenous rights activism.