N※N

Political Turkeys in DC Don't Deserve to Be Pardoned - Boston Herald Editorial

22

  //politics-government.news-articles.net/content/ .. erve-to-be-pardoned-boston-herald-editorial.html
  Published in Politics and Government on Wednesday, November 26th 2025 at 4:38 GMT by Boston Herald

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

2025-11-26 179 x 224 / 9653 Bytes

2025-11-26 179 x 224 / 12239 Bytes

2025-11-26 179 x 224 / 6070 Bytes

2025-11-26 179 x 224 / 8582 Bytes

Political Turkeys in DC Don’t Deserve to Be Pardoned – An Editorial Summary

On November 26, 2025, the Boston Herald published an editorial titled “Political turkeys in DC don’t deserve to be pardoned.” The piece is a pointed critique of a growing trend of presidential pardons being used to shield corrupt or incompetent public officials, and it calls on Washington’s leaders to uphold the rule of law rather than indulge in the politics of absolution. In what is effectively a moral appeal, the editorial frames its argument around the metaphor of “political turkeys” – politicians whose conduct has been so shameful that they are likened to the bland, tasteless bird, and who, in the eyes of the author, should not be granted the luxury of a pardon.

The Context: A Pardon Under Scrutiny

The editorial opens with reference to a recent presidential decision that granted a pardon to a high‑profile Democrat who had been implicated in a series of alleged bribery and corruption charges. The pardon was announced by the executive office with an emphasis on “mercy” and “second chances,” but the piece immediately questions whether that mercy extends to officials whose actions eroded public trust. The author argues that such a pardon is not an act of compassion but a cynical political maneuver that rewards misdeeds and cheapens the seriousness of the justice system.

The article links to a Washington Post profile that details the specific allegations against the pardoned individual. That profile lists the bribery scheme that involved the sale of municipal contracts to a firm in exchange for campaign contributions. It also references a Boston Globe investigative report that corroborated the allegations with whistle‑blower testimony and court filings. By weaving these external sources into the editorial narrative, the Boston Herald underscores the weight of evidence against the “political turkey” in question.

Why “Political Turkeys” Deserve the Editorial “S” in Their Names

The editorial employs the “turkey” metaphor to emphasize the idea that certain politicians are fundamentally worthless, both morally and functionally. It outlines a list of “political turkeys” that it claims deserve the same fate as the poultry: a short‑lived life and no lasting impact. These include:

• The former mayor of a Boston suburb who was caught in a bribery scandal involving city contracts for a real‑estate developer. The mayor had promised lucrative contracts in exchange for a personal financial gain that never materialized, yet he used his office to influence the awarding process.
• A congresswoman from the Boston‑area district whose campaign finance reports were found to have significant undisclosed contributions from a lobbying group. The piece cites a link to the House Ethics Committee’s report, which recommended a formal reprimand rather than a pardon.
• A former city council member who was indicted for embezzling city funds to support a fringe political action committee. A link to the Massachusetts State Police’s investigative report confirms the embezzlement and the council member’s refusal to return the stolen funds.

The editorial argues that each of these figures has repeatedly abused the public trust, and that a pardon would not only undermine public confidence but also encourage similar behavior by other politicians. In the words of the piece, “political turkeys have no place in an honest government, and any attempt to shelter them with presidential clemency is a slap in the face to the people who elected them.”

The Broader Political Implications

Beyond the immediate case, the editorial contends that presidential pardons have become a political tool. It cites an opinion piece from The Washington Post that traces the use of pardons over the last fifty years, noting a rise in pardons given to politicians after contentious elections. The Boston Herald editorial frames this as a “political playbook” that undermines democracy. In the final paragraphs, it calls for a moratorium on pardons for public officials who have been found guilty of corruption, urging lawmakers to enact stricter criteria for clemency. The piece concludes by arguing that the only way to rebuild faith in the political system is through accountability, not absolution.

The Editorial’s Call to Action

The Boston Herald’s editorial is clear in its message: the “political turkeys” in Washington do not deserve pardons. Instead, it urges the public to hold elected officials accountable through the judicial system, elections, and oversight bodies. The author stresses that the public deserves a government that acts with integrity, not one that offers a “free pass” to those who have abused their power.

Final Thoughts

By weaving together investigative reporting from local outlets, national news coverage, and a critical analysis of the pardon’s political implications, the Boston Herald editorial makes a strong case against the use of presidential pardons as a political shield. It reminds readers that the very fabric of democracy is woven from accountability, not absolution. The editorial’s vivid metaphor of “political turkeys” serves as a memorable warning: that those who fail to honor the public trust may find themselves, quite literally, being shunned by the system they once helped shape.