N※N

The Return of Bangladesh's Caretaker Government: A Comprehensive Overview

  //politics-government.news-articles.net/content/ .. retaker-government-a-comprehensive-overview.html
  Published in Politics and Government on Thursday, November 20th 2025 at 11:21 GMT by The Daily Star

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

2025-11-20 179 x 224 / 13349 Bytes

2025-11-20 179 x 224 / 12265 Bytes

2025-11-20 246 x 205 / 8978 Bytes

2025-11-20 179 x 224 / 13117 Bytes

The Return of Bangladesh’s Caretaker Government: A Comprehensive Overview

Bangladesh’s electoral history has long been punctuated by the presence, absence, and eventual resurgence of a neutral caretaker government system. The recent article “When do we get the caretaker government?” on The Daily Star chronicles the origins of the system, the political controversies that led to its abolishment, the legal battles that reignited the debate, and the current political landscape that shapes the possibility of a caretaker government for the next general election.

1. The Birth of the Caretaker System

After the country’s independence in 1971, the initial constitution provided for a neutral body to conduct elections. The 1978 “Caretaker Council” was short‑lived, but a more robust model emerged in the 1990s. In 1996, the 13th amendment to the constitution institutionalised the caretaker government: a non‑partisan body, headed by a chief adviser with the powers of a prime minister, would take over the executive responsibilities for a 90‑day period during which general elections would be held.

The first caretaker‑run election, in 2001, is widely regarded as the most free and fair in the country’s history. The system’s legitimacy was reaffirmed in the 2008 election, which saw the Awami League (AL) secure a landslide victory under the caretaker umbrella.

2. The 2011 Constitutional Amendment and Its Aftermath

In 2011, a controversial amendment removed the caretaker system from the constitution. The move was justified by the ruling party at the time—Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP)—which argued that a non‑partisan body was unnecessary and that the existing parliamentary system could safeguard electoral integrity. The amendment sparked protests from opposition parties, civil society groups, and a sizeable segment of the electorate.

The Supreme Court of Bangladesh intervened in 2013. In a landmark judgement, the court declared the caretaker amendment unconstitutional, emphasizing that the system was essential for ensuring credible elections. Despite the ruling, the political climate remained fraught; the 2014 general election was conducted under a parliamentary system, leading to allegations of rigour and intimidation.

3. The 2008 Election: A Benchmark for Credibility

To contextualise the debate, the article revisits the 2008 election, where the caretaker government played a pivotal role. It links to the official election commission data and independent observer reports, underscoring the following achievements:

• Transparent Voter Registration: Voter rolls were updated and verified by independent observers.
• Neutral Media Environment: The caretaker regime maintained strict controls against partisan campaigning during the campaign period.
• Accurate Counting: The Election Commission’s meticulous counting process was deemed error‑free.

The article highlights that the 2008 election’s success set a benchmark that many now believe must be restored for upcoming elections.

4. Political Dynamics: The Awami League, BNP, and Other Stakeholders

The piece delves into the political calculus that surrounds the caretaker debate. The Awami League, the ruling party, has consistently opposed the caretaker system, citing concerns about political paralysis and the potential for the opposition to exploit the neutral body for partisan gain. Conversely, the BNP, alongside other opposition parties and numerous civil society organisations, maintains that a caretaker government is indispensable for fair elections.

In addition to the two main parties, the article notes the growing role of new political movements—such as the Jatiya Party and the emerging youth‑led “Bangladesh Liberation Front”—in demanding a transparent electoral process. These groups have begun to coordinate with local election watchdogs and international observers, adding layers of pressure on the government.

5. Legal Landscape and International Input

The article links to the Supreme Court’s 2013 judgement (available on the court’s official website) and to international legal analyses from the International IDEA. The International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA) has recommended reinstating a caretaker system, citing comparative studies of parliamentary democracies. The article quotes the International IDEA’s 2022 report, which states: “A caretaker government, if implemented with proper safeguards, can enhance the legitimacy of elections in fragile democracies.”

6. Current Prospects: Timeline and Challenges

The Daily Star’s piece outlines several key milestones that will shape whether a caretaker government will be reinstated before the next general election, slated for 2026:

1. Legislative Action: The parliament must introduce a bill to amend the constitution, re‑establishing the caretaker system. The bill would need to be passed by a two‑thirds majority, a threshold that the current AL‑led parliament can achieve but one that the opposition can attempt to block.
2. Institutional Readiness: The Election Commission must develop a framework for selecting and vetting chief advisers, ensuring transparency and impartiality.
3. Public Mandate: Opinion polls indicate that a majority of citizens—particularly the younger demographic—support a caretaker system. The article cites a recent poll by the Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies (BIDS) indicating 68% favourability.

Challenges remain: the opposition’s concerns over the neutrality of the caretaker council, the potential for political manipulation, and the risk of voter fatigue. The article also highlights the threat of civil unrest if the caretaker debate is not resolved within the 2024–2025 window.

7. The Road Ahead: What Citizens Can Expect

For ordinary citizens, the reinstatement of a caretaker government could mean:

• Greater Electoral Transparency: Independent audits and international observers could monitor every phase of the election.
• Reduced Political Polarisation: By removing the ruling party’s influence from the electoral process, voters may feel more confident in their choices.
• Potential for New Political Entrants: A neutral system may level the playing field for emerging parties and independent candidates.

Conversely, critics argue that a caretaker government could stall policy initiatives and create a governance vacuum, especially if the transition between the caretaker and elected government is not smooth.

8. Conclusion

The article from The Daily Star paints a complex picture: a system that once upheld electoral integrity has been abolished, only to be re‑introduced through legal avenues and political negotiations. The upcoming years will be decisive. The government’s willingness to engage with opposition demands, the legal robustness of the caretaker model, and the public’s appetite for transparent elections will collectively determine whether Bangladesh can safely resume the caretaker system for its next general election.

For further reading, the article links to the original Supreme Court judgement, the International IDEA’s 2022 report on caretaker governments, and a detailed timeline of the caretaker system’s evolution. By navigating these resources, readers can gain a deeper understanding of the constitutional, political, and societal forces that shape Bangladesh’s democratic trajectory.