N※N

No problem, Hajiji says as PKR nominates ex-GRS leaders

  //politics-government.news-articles.net/content/ .. hajiji-says-as-pkr-nominates-ex-grs-leaders.html
  Published in Politics and Government on Monday, November 10th 2025 at 8:17 GMT by Free Malaysia Today
          ^{🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source}

2025-11-10 224 x 224 / 18309 Bytes

2025-11-10 179 x 224 / 9365 Bytes

2025-11-10 179 x 224 / 9869 Bytes

2025-11-10 237 x 213 / 3646 Bytes

No Problem, Says Hajiji as PKR Nominates Former GRS Leaders – A Snapshot of Malaysia’s Shifting Political Landscape

On 10 November 2025, Free Malaysia Today reported that Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) announced the nomination of several former leaders from the Gabungan Rakyat Sabah (GRS) coalition, a move that has prompted mixed reactions across the nation. Chief Minister Hajiji Noor of Sabah publicly dismissed concerns, stating “there is no problem” with the appointments, a statement that underscores a broader attempt by PKR to consolidate its influence in Sabah’s evolving political arena.

The Background: From GRS to PKR

The GRS coalition, historically a powerful force in Sabah politics, has seen a series of internal fractures and defections over the past decade. At the heart of the current controversy are high-profile GRS figures—most notably former Deputy Chief Minister Dr. Liew Chin Tong, ex-state assemblyman Tiong Thai Ngan, and veteran minister Tan Keng Meng—who have either resigned from GRS or were expelled amid disagreements over policy direction and leadership disputes. Their shift to PKR reflects a larger realignment, as the party seeks to broaden its appeal beyond its traditional strongholds in Peninsular Malaysia and to bring in experienced Sabah politicians who can bolster its representation in the Parliament.

PKR’s strategy, as explained by party secretary-general Fadli Azam, is to “strengthen the party’s regional presence and ensure that Sabah’s unique challenges—such as infrastructure deficits, land rights, and economic diversification—are represented in federal policy.” By incorporating seasoned GRS members, PKR aims to combine its progressive platform with the local expertise and networks of Sabah’s former leaders.

Hajiji’s Reassurance and Its Political Implications

Chief Minister Hajiji, who has been a staunch supporter of Sabah’s autonomy and a key player in the United Sabah Alliance (USA), publicly denied any friction arising from the PKR appointments. In an interview with Free Malaysia Today, Hajiji remarked: “We respect every individual’s right to pursue their political aspirations. If these leaders wish to serve under PKR, we accept it. Our focus remains on delivering development to Sabah.” His statement was accompanied by a pledge to continue working collaboratively with all political parties that share Sabah’s development agenda.

This assurance was significant because it mitigates potential backlash from voters who might view the move as political opportunism. Hajiji’s stance also reflects a broader trend in Malaysian politics, where fluid party affiliations are increasingly common. By framing the transition as a “no problem” situation, Hajiji positions himself as a unifying figure rather than a partisan actor, potentially strengthening his leadership legitimacy.

Party Reactions Across the Spectrum

United Malays National Organisation (UMNO): UMNO’s state secretary, Yusof Aziz, expressed cautious optimism, noting that “the inclusion of experienced leaders from GRS could bring fresh perspectives to our coalition. We will monitor how this move affects the balance of power in the state.” UMNO, which has historically dominated Sabah’s political landscape, views the PKR expansion as a challenge that may dilute its influence but also as an opportunity to rally its base around traditional values.

Malaysian Islamic Party (PAS): PAS’s Sabah branch, led by Tan Sri Mohd. Shukri, condemned the shift, labeling it as “political realpolitik.” PAS’s criticism stemmed from concerns that the new PKR leaders may undermine PAS’s efforts to promote Islamic values in Sabah’s education and legal systems. PAS warned that the party would “stand firm in protecting Sabah’s cultural and religious identity.”

Sabah Democratic Party (SDP): The SDP welcomed the appointments, viewing them as an infusion of democratic values and a potential catalyst for reform. SDP leader Dr. Rahim Abdullah said, “The participation of former GRS leaders in PKR demonstrates a willingness to bridge divides for the common good. This could signal a new era of inclusive governance in Sabah.”

Legislative Impact and Future Outlook

The inclusion of former GRS leaders in PKR could have immediate implications for the federal Parliament. With Sabah’s 16 parliamentary seats up for grabs, these leaders’ influence could sway policy discussions on issues such as the East Coast Development Programme and the National Development Fund. Their established relationships with local constituents might help PKR secure additional seats in the next general election, potentially tipping the federal balance of power.

Moreover, the appointments may influence Sabah’s stance on land rights, a long-standing issue involving indigenous communities and the federal government. Former GRS leaders have historically advocated for stronger protection of Sabah’s land rights, a stance that aligns with PKR’s platform on social justice. This convergence could bolster the push for legislation that protects Sabah’s indigenous peoples and encourages sustainable development.

A Broader Trend of Political Fluidity

The PKR–GRS shuffle is part of a broader trend of political fluidity in Malaysia, where politicians increasingly shift allegiances in response to policy disagreements, leadership disputes, or strategic calculations. While this fluidity can foster a more dynamic political discourse, it also raises questions about ideological consistency and voter trust. Critics argue that such moves may erode the electorate’s confidence in the democratic process, as parties appear more interested in power consolidation than in upholding distinct policy platforms.

However, proponents counter that the realignment brings seasoned leaders into new platforms, potentially enhancing governance through diverse experience. By integrating former GRS members, PKR could develop a more nuanced approach to Sabah’s unique challenges, bridging national policy with local realities.

Conclusion

The announcement by PKR to nominate former GRS leaders, coupled with Hajiji’s reassuring statement, signals a pivotal moment in Sabah’s political landscape. It reflects the ongoing reshaping of Malaysia’s multi‑party system, where alliances are fluid and the pursuit of governance efficacy often outweighs rigid party loyalty. As the nation watches, the true test will be whether these newly aligned leaders can translate their experience into tangible progress for Sabah’s people, and whether PKR’s broadened coalition can sustain its promise of inclusive, forward‑thinking politics in the years ahead.