N※N

Political Interference Cripples Ghana's Anti-Corruption Efforts

  //politics-government.news-articles.net/content/ .. ce-cripples-ghana-s-anti-corruption-efforts.html
  Published in Politics and Government on Tuesday, February 17th 2026 at 9:15 GMT by Ghanaweb.com
      Locales:

Political Interference Cripples Ghana's Anti-Corruption Efforts: A Deepening Crisis

Accra - February 17th, 2026 - The Ghana Anti-Corruption Coalition (GACC) has renewed its stark warning regarding escalating political interference in corruption prosecutions, a problem that has demonstrably worsened since their initial statement in 2022. What began as concerns over delays and selective enforcement has now blossomed into a systemic issue threatening the very foundation of Ghana's fight against corruption, according to a comprehensive GACC report released today.

The report details a disturbing pattern of politically motivated decisions impacting ongoing investigations and prosecutions. The GACC alleges that cases involving politically exposed persons (PEPs) - those with significant political power - are routinely subjected to undue delays, have charges inexplicably dropped, or are pursued with significantly less vigour compared to cases involving individuals without such connections. This isn't simply a matter of a few isolated incidents; the GACC claims to have documented over thirty instances in the last year alone where clear evidence of interference exists.

"We are witnessing a dangerous erosion of public trust in our justice system," stated Nana Asantewa Afua, Executive Director of the GACC, during a press conference. "The selective application of the law, where some are seemingly above accountability due to their political affiliations, is deeply damaging. It creates a climate of impunity and actively discourages citizens from reporting corruption."

The GACC's findings align with observations from international bodies. Transparency International's 2026 Corruption Perceptions Index, released last month, showed a continued decline in Ghana's score, placing it amongst the bottom third of nations globally. Experts cite the lack of independent investigations and prosecutions as a primary driver of this negative trend.

Beyond the direct impact on individual cases, the interference has a chilling effect on anti-corruption agencies like the Office of the Special Prosecutor and the Economic and Organised Crime Office (EOCO). Sources within these institutions, speaking anonymously for fear of reprisal, report a growing sense of frustration and powerlessness. They describe pressure from political actors to either halt investigations or to tailor charges to achieve predetermined outcomes. This pressure manifests in various forms, including subtle threats, budget cuts, and the deliberate withholding of necessary resources.

The GACC report highlights several specific cases. One involves the alleged misappropriation of funds related to a major infrastructure project. While an initial investigation by EOCO revealed substantial evidence of wrongdoing, the case has stalled indefinitely, with key witnesses reportedly being intimidated and evidence inexplicably disappearing from court records. Another case, involving allegations of conflict of interest against a former minister, saw the charges dropped just weeks before the start of the trial, citing "lack of sufficient evidence" - a claim disputed by the original investigators.

The consequences of this systemic corruption extend far beyond financial losses. It undermines economic development, discourages foreign investment, and exacerbates social inequalities. Experts also warn that it fuels political instability and breeds resentment among the citizenry. The rise of social media and citizen journalism, while offering a platform for exposing corruption, also creates an environment ripe for misinformation and polarization if trust in official institutions continues to decline.

The GACC is calling for a multi-faceted approach to address the crisis. This includes strengthening the independence of the judiciary, providing adequate funding and resources to anti-corruption agencies, enacting comprehensive whistleblower protection legislation, and most crucially, a firm commitment from political leaders to refrain from interfering in the work of these institutions. They are also proposing the establishment of an independent oversight body with the power to investigate allegations of political interference and hold perpetrators accountable.

Furthermore, the GACC is advocating for greater transparency in political funding and lobbying activities. The lack of regulation in these areas creates opportunities for undue influence and makes it difficult to trace the sources of corruption. They propose a public registry of lobbying activities and a strict enforcement of campaign finance laws.

The question remains whether Ghana's political leadership will heed the GACC's warnings and take decisive action. The future of the nation's fight against corruption - and indeed, the future of good governance in Ghana - hangs in the balance.