N※N

Lebanon Launches Risky Disarmament Plan Targeting Hezbollah

  //politics-government.news-articles.net/content/ .. -risky-disarmament-plan-targeting-hezbollah.html
  Published in Politics and Government on Tuesday, February 3rd 2026 at 17:15 GMT by WNYT NewsChannel 13
      Locales: LEBANON, ISRAEL

Beirut, Lebanon - February 3rd, 2026 - The Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) have initiated a new, and potentially explosive, phase of its long-stalled disarmament plan, directly targeting non-state armed groups - most notably Hezbollah. The move, announced Monday, comes at a time of acute economic crisis, persistent political instability, and escalating regional tensions, raising questions about its feasibility and the potential for widespread conflict.

The LAF stated the plan will concentrate on areas where armed groups operate with a degree of autonomy, aiming to reassert state authority and mitigate the risk of inter-factional clashes. While details remain scarce, the intention appears to be a comprehensive effort to dismantle the parallel military structures that have long undermined Lebanon's sovereignty. However, the primary, and most daunting, target is undoubtedly Hezbollah.

Hezbollah, a powerful Shiite political and military organization, is deeply ingrained in the Lebanese fabric. Designated as a terrorist organization by the United States, Israel, and numerous other nations, it nevertheless commands significant political influence and maintains a heavily armed force that arguably surpasses the LAF in both size and capability. This complex duality - a designated terrorist group wielding considerable domestic power - presents a unique and deeply challenging situation for the Lebanese government.

The decision to move forward with the disarmament plan is a gamble, carrying immense risk. Hezbollah's entrenched position and broad support base, particularly within the Shiite community, suggest any forceful attempt at disarmament will likely be met with fierce resistance. This resistance could easily escalate into open conflict, potentially plunging Lebanon into another civil war - a scenario with devastating regional consequences.

A History of Failed Attempts & Regional Context

Previous attempts at disarming Hezbollah, most notably under UN Security Council Resolution 1701 following the 2006 Lebanon War, have yielded limited results. While the resolution mandated the disarmament of all armed groups in Lebanon, it lacked effective enforcement mechanisms and Hezbollah largely retained its weaponry. The current push differs in that it originates from within the Lebanese state itself, though heavily influenced by international pressure.

The timing of this renewed effort is crucial. Regional tensions are high, fueled by the ongoing conflicts in Syria, Yemen, and the persistent Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The recent surge in maritime tensions in the Red Sea and the increasing involvement of regional actors in proxy conflicts adds another layer of complexity. Many analysts believe the LAF's move is, in part, a gesture intended to appease international partners and demonstrate a commitment to regional stability. Concerns have grown among Western nations and Gulf states about the potential for Lebanon to become a flashpoint for wider conflict.

Economic Crisis Compounds the Risk

The economic crisis gripping Lebanon since 2019 adds another layer of volatility. The country's currency has collapsed, the banking system is in ruins, and widespread poverty and unemployment are rampant. This economic hardship fuels social unrest and creates a fertile ground for radicalization, potentially strengthening the appeal of armed groups who can offer a semblance of security or patronage. Disarming Hezbollah without addressing the underlying economic grievances could exacerbate these problems, potentially leading to increased instability rather than the desired outcome of peace.

Feasibility & Future Prospects

Skepticism about the plan's feasibility remains widespread. Hezbollah's integration into Lebanon's political system, its extensive social services network, and its perceived role as a defender against external threats (particularly Israel) all contribute to its resilience. Successfully disarming the group would require a comprehensive strategy that addresses these factors, including robust economic support, political reforms, and a credible security framework to fill the vacuum created by Hezbollah's absence.

Some observers suggest a phased approach, focusing initially on areas where Hezbollah's presence is less dominant and offering incentives for voluntary disarmament. Others emphasize the need for dialogue and negotiations, seeking to integrate Hezbollah into the state's security apparatus under strict government control. However, such solutions are fraught with difficulties, given the deep mistrust and animosity between Hezbollah and its political rivals.

The coming weeks and months will be critical. The success or failure of this disarmament plan will likely determine the fate of Lebanon, and could have far-reaching implications for regional stability. Whether the LAF can navigate this treacherous path remains to be seen.