Maxwell Invokes Fifth Amendment in House Hearing
Locales: UNITED STATES, UNITED KINGDOM

Washington D.C. - February 9th, 2026 - Ghislaine Maxwell, convicted in 2021 on multiple federal charges related to her involvement in Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking ring, again remained tight-lipped today during a House Oversight Committee hearing. Appearing virtually, Maxwell invoked her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, refusing to answer any questions regarding her extensive relationship with Epstein and the wider network that enabled his crimes. The hearing, initially convened to further investigate the full scope of Epstein's abuse and Maxwell's role, yielded little in the way of new information, leaving lawmakers frustrated and victims' advocates demanding greater accountability.
Today's proceedings echo the pattern established during Maxwell's trial and subsequent appeals. While convicted, many questions surrounding the full extent of her knowledge and the identities of other individuals involved remain unanswered. Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, leading the questioning for the Republican side, immediately pressed Maxwell for details about her interactions with Epstein, prompting a swift response from Maxwell's legal counsel asserting her Fifth Amendment privilege. This tactic, while legally permissible, drew criticism from committee members who argued that it obstructed the pursuit of justice and hindered efforts to provide closure to Epstein's victims.
The House Oversight Committee's renewed focus on the Epstein case comes amid growing public interest and continued revelations about the breadth of the criminal enterprise. Over the past seven years since Epstein's death - a death still subject to persistent conspiracy theories despite official findings of suicide - new documents and testimonies have slowly surfaced, painting a disturbing picture of systematic abuse and elite complicity. The committee hopes to piece together a more complete understanding of how Epstein was able to operate with impunity for so long, and identify any remaining individuals who may have aided or abetted his crimes.
This isn't simply a matter of revisiting past events; the stakes are higher now. Lawmakers are also keen to understand what systemic failures allowed such a network to flourish. Specifically, the committee is examining allegations of negligence and potential misconduct within institutions that were allegedly aware of Epstein's behavior but failed to take appropriate action. This includes investigations into financial institutions, law enforcement agencies, and even individuals within the political establishment.
While Maxwell's silence is frustrating, it highlights a critical legal hurdle in pursuing full accountability. The Fifth Amendment, designed to protect individuals from self-incrimination, ironically serves as a shield for those potentially deeply implicated in criminal activity. However, some legal scholars argue that a broader review of existing evidence and a willingness to grant immunity to lesser players in exchange for truthful testimony could unlock crucial information.
Victims' advocacy groups expressed disappointment with the hearing's outcome, emphasizing the ongoing trauma experienced by survivors. "For the victims, this isn't just about putting individuals behind bars; it's about acknowledging the harm, ensuring justice is served, and preventing similar atrocities from happening again," stated Sarah Jenkins, director of the National Survivor Network. "Maxwell's silence is another blow, but it will not deter us from fighting for accountability and support for those who have suffered."
The committee is now considering several options, including the possibility of subpoenaing additional witnesses and pursuing further investigations into financial records and other documentary evidence. The focus is shifting toward tracing the money trail, which many believe will lead to the identification of co-conspirators and reveal the extent of the financial benefits derived from Epstein's criminal enterprise. There's also discussion about potential legislative reforms to strengthen protections for victims of sex trafficking and enhance the ability of law enforcement to investigate and prosecute these types of crimes. The Epstein case continues to cast a long shadow, and the pursuit of justice remains an ongoing and complex challenge.
Read the Full Fox News Article at:
[ https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ghislaine-maxwell-pleads-fifth-amendment-dodges-questions-house-oversight-epstein-probe ]