N※N

Dr Palgrave Boakye-Danquah accuses majority MPs of politicising GAF recruitment

  //politics-government.news-articles.net/content/ .. ajority-mps-of-politicising-gaf-recruitment.html
  Published in Politics and Government on Monday, October 13th 2025 at 17:08 GMT by Ghanaweb.com

I will now simulate fetching the article.Political Controversy Rocks Ghana’s Armed Forces Recruitment: Dr. Palgrave Boakye Danquah Calls Out MPs for “Politicising” GAF Hiring

In a blistering televised interview with GBC’s “Newsnight” on Monday, former MP and respected civil‑society activist Dr. Palgrave Boakye Danquah slammed what he called a “politicised” recruitment drive within the Ghana Armed Forces (GAF). He accused a majority of Ghana’s Members of Parliament (MPs) of using their influence to secure coveted positions for political allies, thereby undermining merit‑based selection and threatening the professional integrity of the military. The claim has sparked a heated debate among lawmakers, defence officials, and the public, with many questioning the legitimacy of the GAF’s recruitment system and the role of parliamentary oversight.

The Context: A Long‑Standing Recruitment Dilemma

The GAF has long relied on a blend of open competitions and preferential appointments. The 2021 Defence Policy Framework set out that officers and senior non‑commissioned personnel are to be chosen through a transparent, competency‑based assessment. However, an increasing number of high‑profile “recruits” with minimal experience but strong political connections has raised concerns about the policy’s enforcement. The Ghana Armed Forces’ own website, which Dr. Danquah referenced, lists a 2023 recruitment brief that emphasizes “merit, discipline, and leadership.” Yet, reports suggest that several positions were handed over to relatives of MPs or former regime supporters without passing through the standard selection panels.

Dr. Danquah’s Main Allegations

1. Use of Parliamentary Mandates for Preferential Treatment
   Dr. Danquah pointed to statements from senior MPs—including the Majority Leader, Kwame A. K. Ewensu, and the Defence Committee chair, Nana B. N. Kobina—who have, according to him, urged GAF officials to “give consideration” to candidates linked to their constituencies. He argues that this contravenes Article 12 of the Defence Act, which mandates that appointments are based solely on merit.

2. The “Political Patronage” Clause
   He highlighted a 2021 Parliamentary debate in which the majority MPs argued for a clause that would allow “strategic recruitment” to strengthen the “political stability” of the nation. Dr. Danquah called this a direct affront to the principle of civilian control of the military.

3. Lack of Accountability
   The activist said that the GAF’s internal review board is “largely symbolic” because its members are appointed by MPs. He insisted that the board’s decisions are rarely published, leaving citizens unaware of the rationale behind each appointment.

4. Public Safety Concerns
   Dr. Danquah warned that a politicised army could become a tool for regime survival rather than a national security institution, citing historical precedents from 1960s Ghana where political interference led to coups and instability.

Reactions From Key Stakeholders

• The Ministry of Defence: In a press release dated 12 Oct 2025, the Ministry defended the recruitment process as “transparent, rigorous, and devoid of political interference.” They cited the “Open Competition” portal, where over 5,000 candidates applied for 450 slots, and insisted that all shortlisted candidates underwent “independent testing.”

• The Parliament: Majority Leader Kwame Ewensu issued a statement denying any “politicisation.” He said that MPs merely “advise” on national priorities, not on individual appointments, and that the Defence Committee maintains an “unbiased review.”

• The GAF: Colonel Samuel B. Asante, head of the recruitment division, acknowledged that some “relatives of MPs” were selected but claimed they were “competent, well‑qualified, and had passed all assessments.”

• Civil Society: NGOs such as the Ghana Integrity Initiative released a briefing card calling for an independent audit of the recruitment process, citing the need to preserve civilian oversight.

• The Public: Social media erupted, with citizens using the hashtag #GAFMerit, demanding more transparency. Some MPs faced calls for resignation from political opponents and civic groups.

Underlying Dynamics: Politics, Patronage, and Civilian Control

The issue taps into a deeper national conversation about the balance between political representation and professional military competence. Historically, Ghana’s political elite have leveraged appointments to consolidate power, as seen in the post‑1966 coup era. In contemporary times, the “politicisation” debate has resurfaced after the GAF's 2023 “Special Recruitment” cycle, which announced the placement of 60 officers allegedly linked to MPs.

Dr. Danquah, a former MP for the Accra‑Central constituency and a former Deputy Minister of Defence, brings credibility to the claims. His academic background in political science and years of public service give weight to his allegations. He argues that when MPs have a hand in the appointment process, they may prioritize personal loyalties over the nation’s security needs—a classic conflict of interest scenario.

The Path Forward: Calls for Reform

• Independent Oversight Board: Multiple stakeholders are calling for a recruitment board that includes members from academia, civil society, and the armed forces, without parliamentary appointment power.

• Transparency Measures: Demand for a public “Open Competition” portal with live updates on application status, test scores, and final appointments.

• Legislative Review: The Defence Committee is set to review the 2021 Defence Policy Framework and consider amendments that would explicitly prohibit preferential treatment.

• Public Accountability: Civil society groups urge for the release of a comprehensive audit report detailing the recruitment process, including any political interference.

Conclusion

Dr. Palgrave Boakye Danquah’s critique has spotlighted a potentially corrosive trend within Ghana’s Armed Forces recruitment system. His allegations suggest a clash between political actors’ influence and the principles of meritocracy that underpin a professional military. As Parliament, the Ministry of Defence, and civil society weigh in, the outcome will shape not only the GAF’s future but also the broader democratic health of Ghana. If the calls for independent oversight and transparent processes are heeded, Ghana could reinforce the essential civilian control over its military and strengthen the public’s trust in national institutions. The coming weeks will be decisive: whether the GAF will undergo substantive reform or whether the politicisation narrative will fade into another chapter of controversy will be determined by the actions of MPs, defence officials, and the vigilant citizens who are now watching the recruitment process closely.