N※N

Show Politics and Government Publications

Peopleswillnotmine

People's Will, Not Mine: Sheikh Hasina Reflects on Resignation Amid Bangladesh's Political Turmoil

In a poignant and reflective statement issued from her place of exile, former Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina has broken her silence on the dramatic events that led to her abrupt departure from power. Addressing the nation and the world through a message shared by her son, Sajeeb Wazed Joy, Hasina emphasized that her resignation was not a decision driven by personal ambition or reluctance, but rather a deference to the will of the people. This comes in the wake of widespread protests that rocked Bangladesh, culminating in her ousting after 15 years of continuous rule. The statement, laden with emotion and historical references, sheds light on Hasina's perspective on the chaos that unfolded, her family's legacy, and her hopes for the country's future.

Hasina's message begins with a somber acknowledgment of the violence and loss of life during the protests. She expresses deep sorrow for the deaths of students, ordinary citizens, and members of her Awami League party, describing the unrest as a "terror" that engulfed the nation. Drawing parallels to the tragic assassination of her father, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, in 1975, she recounts how that event claimed the lives of most of her family members, leaving her and her sister as survivors in exile. This historical trauma, she implies, has shaped her resilience and commitment to Bangladesh's development. Hasina portrays her return to politics not as a quest for power, but as a mission to uplift the impoverished and build a prosperous nation, free from the shadows of militancy and terrorism.

Central to her narrative is the assertion that she could have clung to power through force, but chose not to. "I resigned because I did not want to see a procession of dead bodies," she states, underscoring her aversion to bloodshed. She claims that external forces, including offers of support from unnamed foreign entities, tempted her to suppress the uprising, but she rejected them, prioritizing human life over authority. This decision, she argues, aligns with the people's will, even if it meant stepping down from a position she held with the mandate of multiple elections. Hasina's words paint a picture of a leader who views her tenure as one of significant achievements—transforming Bangladesh from a struggling economy to one of the fastest-growing in South Asia, with advancements in infrastructure, education, and women's empowerment. Yet, she laments how these gains were overshadowed by accusations of authoritarianism, suppression of dissent, and economic disparities that fueled the protests.

The protests themselves originated from student-led demonstrations against a controversial job quota system, which reserved positions for descendants of 1971 freedom fighters—a policy tied to Hasina's father's legacy. What began as peaceful rallies escalated into nationwide chaos, with reports of police crackdowns, internet blackouts, and clashes resulting in hundreds of deaths. Hasina accuses "militants and terrorists" of hijacking the movement, turning it into a violent spree that targeted Awami League offices, public infrastructure, and even cultural symbols like the Bangabandhu Memorial Museum. She specifically mentions the destruction of her childhood home and the desecration of her father's statues, evoking a sense of personal betrayal and national loss.

In her exile, reportedly in India, Hasina calls for justice and accountability. She urges the people to demand investigations into the killings and to protect the rights of all citizens, regardless of political affiliation. Her message is a plea for unity, warning against the perils of division and extremism. "Do not let the country fall into the hands of terrorists again," she implores, referencing past eras of instability under military rule and opposition-led violence. Hasina positions herself as a guardian of democracy, insisting that her government's efforts had eradicated terrorism and fostered economic stability, only to be undone by orchestrated unrest.

This statement arrives at a critical juncture for Bangladesh, as an interim government led by Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus takes the helm. The new administration faces the daunting task of restoring order, addressing grievances, and preparing for elections. Hasina's words could be seen as an attempt to shape her legacy, countering narratives that depict her as a dictator who fled amid corruption allegations. Critics, however, argue that her rule was marred by electoral manipulations, media censorship, and human rights abuses, which alienated large segments of the population, particularly the youth.

Broader implications of Hasina's resignation extend beyond Bangladesh's borders. The country's strategic location in South Asia, its role in global garment manufacturing, and its vulnerability to climate change make its stability crucial for regional dynamics. India, a close ally during Hasina's tenure, has expressed concerns over potential instability, while other powers like China and the United States watch closely. Hasina's reference to foreign interference hints at geopolitical undercurrents, possibly alluding to influences from Western nations or rivals seeking to exploit the power vacuum.

Hasina's message also touches on personal themes of loss and endurance. She speaks of her life in exile after 1975, her return in 1981, and her rise to power in 1996, framing her political journey as one of sacrifice for the nation's greater good. By invoking the spirit of the 1971 Liberation War and her father's vision of a "Sonar Bangla" (Golden Bengal), she seeks to remind Bangladeshis of shared history and aspirations. Yet, the irony is stark: the very quotas meant to honor freedom fighters became the spark for her downfall, highlighting generational shifts in priorities.

As Bangladesh navigates this transition, Hasina's statement serves as both a defense and a farewell. It underscores the fragility of power in the face of public will, a lesson resonant in democracies worldwide. Whether her words will rehabilitate her image or deepen divisions remains to be seen, but they undeniably add a layer of complexity to the narrative of a nation in flux. In the end, Hasina's insistence that it is "the people's will, not mine" encapsulates a leader's reluctant acceptance of change, even as she yearns for vindication through history's lens.

(Word count: 928)

Read the Full The Daily Star Article at:
[ https://www.thedailystar.net/news/bangladesh/news/peoples-will-not-mine-3963986 ]