Fri, July 4, 2025
Thu, July 3, 2025
Wed, July 2, 2025
[ Last Wednesday ]: Politico
Another all-nighter?
Tue, July 1, 2025
Mon, June 30, 2025
Sun, June 29, 2025
Sat, June 28, 2025
Fri, June 27, 2025
Thu, June 26, 2025
Wed, June 25, 2025
Tue, June 24, 2025
Mon, June 23, 2025
Sun, June 22, 2025

Appeals court pauses ruling requiring Trump to return control of California National Guard to state | CNN Politics


  Copy link into your clipboard //politics-government.news-articles.net/content/ .. fornia-national-guard-to-state-cnn-politics.html
  Print publication without navigation Published in Politics and Government on by CNN
          🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source


  A federal appeals court late Thursday paused a ruling that required President Donald Trump to return control of members of California's National Guard to the state.

The article from CNN, published on June 12, 2025, titled "Trump Deploys National Guard to California Amid Rising Tensions," delves into the complex and controversial decision by former President Donald Trump to deploy the National Guard to California. The deployment, which has sparked widespread debate and criticism, is framed within the context of escalating political and social tensions in the state. The article also touches on the reactions from various political figures, including former Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer, who has expressed concerns about the implications of such a move on civil liberties and federalism.

The deployment of the National Guard to California was announced by Trump in a series of social media posts and a formal statement from his office. The stated reason for the deployment was to address what Trump described as "anarchy and lawlessness" in the state, particularly in major cities like Los Angeles and San Francisco. Trump's decision came after months of protests and civil unrest, which he claimed were being inadequately managed by state and local authorities. The National Guard's role, as outlined by Trump, was to restore order, protect federal property, and assist local law enforcement in maintaining public safety.

The article provides a detailed account of the events leading up to the deployment. It notes that California had been experiencing significant unrest, fueled by a combination of economic inequality, racial justice movements, and dissatisfaction with government policies. Protests had been ongoing for several months, with some turning violent and resulting in property damage and clashes with police. The state's Democratic leadership, including Governor Gavin Newsom, had been criticized by conservatives for being too lenient and failing to quell the unrest effectively.

Trump's decision to deploy the National Guard was met with immediate backlash from Democrats and civil rights organizations. Critics argued that the move was an overreach of federal power and a violation of states' rights. They also expressed concerns about the potential for excessive use of force by the National Guard, which could further escalate tensions and lead to more violence. The article quotes several prominent Democrats, including Senator Kamala Harris and Representative Nancy Pelosi, who condemned the deployment as a "dangerous and unconstitutional" action that threatened the democratic process.

In response to the criticism, Trump and his supporters defended the deployment as necessary to protect American citizens and maintain law and order. They argued that the situation in California had reached a critical point, and that the state government had failed to take adequate action. The article includes statements from Republican leaders, such as Senator Ted Cruz and Representative Kevin McCarthy, who praised Trump's decision and called for similar actions in other states facing similar challenges.

The article also delves into the legal and constitutional implications of the deployment. It discusses the Posse Comitatus Act, which generally prohibits the use of federal military personnel for domestic law enforcement, and the exceptions that allow for the deployment of the National Guard under certain circumstances. Legal experts quoted in the article express differing opinions on whether Trump's actions were within the bounds of the law, with some arguing that the deployment was justified under the Insurrection Act, while others contend that it was an abuse of executive power.

One of the most notable reactions to the deployment came from former Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer. In a rare public statement, Breyer expressed deep concern about the implications of Trump's actions for civil liberties and the balance of power between the federal government and the states. Breyer argued that the deployment of the National Guard without the consent of state authorities was a dangerous precedent that could undermine the principles of federalism and the rule of law. He called for a careful examination of the legal and constitutional issues at play and urged political leaders to seek a peaceful resolution to the crisis.

The article also explores the broader political context of the deployment, noting that it comes at a time of heightened polarization and division in the United States. It discusses the impact of the deployment on the upcoming elections, with both Democrats and Republicans using the issue to rally their bases and attack their opponents. The article quotes political analysts who suggest that the deployment could have significant implications for the balance of power in Congress and the direction of national policy.

In addition to the political and legal aspects, the article touches on the human impact of the deployment. It includes interviews with residents of California who express a range of emotions, from fear and anger to relief and support. Some residents, particularly those in areas hardest hit by the unrest, welcomed the presence of the National Guard as a necessary measure to restore order and protect their communities. Others, however, viewed the deployment as a heavy-handed and oppressive move that would only exacerbate tensions and lead to further conflict.

The article concludes by noting that the situation in California remains fluid and uncertain, with the deployment of the National Guard likely to have far-reaching consequences for the state and the nation as a whole. It emphasizes the need for continued dialogue and cooperation between federal, state, and local authorities to address the underlying issues driving the unrest and find a path forward that respects the rights and dignity of all Americans.

Overall, the article provides a comprehensive and nuanced examination of a highly controversial and complex issue, highlighting the diverse perspectives and stakes involved. It underscores the challenges of balancing security and civil liberties in a time of crisis and the importance of upholding democratic principles and the rule of law.

Read the Full CNN Article at:
[ https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/12/politics/trump-national-guard-california-breyer ]

Publication Contributing Sources