by: WJAX
Political assassinations in Minnesota put spotlight on Florida bill to shield officials' addresses
by: rnz
Despite decades of cost cutting, governments spend more than ever. How can we make sense of this?
by: CNN
by: CNN
by: CNN
The DNC's cash crunch deepens as new filings show Republicans with a huge advantage | CNN Politics
by: CNN
by: Politico
RFK Jr. threatens to bar government scientists from publishing in leading medical journals
by: CNN
by: CNN
Giuliani, Lewandowski among new members of Homeland Security advisory council | CNN Politics
by: WTOP
Former Govs. Larry Hogan, Steve Bullock repeat call for more listening, less shouting in politics
by: ThePrint
Many power centres in state Cong, political developments in Karnataka after Sept: Minister
by: CNN
Capitol agenda: How Johnson may block an Iran rebuke

The resolution seeks to repeal the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) and the 2002 Iraq AUMF, which have been used by successive administrations to justify military actions in the Middle East without specific congressional approval. The move is seen as an attempt to prevent future presidents from engaging in military actions against Iran without explicit congressional authorization. This is particularly relevant given the heightened tensions between the U.S. and Iran, which have been exacerbated by recent incidents, including attacks on U.S. forces in the region and Iran's nuclear program.
House Speaker Mike Johnson has been a vocal proponent of the resolution, emphasizing the need for Congress to reclaim its war powers. Johnson argues that the executive branch has overstepped its authority, particularly during the Trump administration, which he believes used the existing AUMFs to justify military actions that should have required congressional approval. Johnson's stance is supported by a diverse group of lawmakers, including both Democrats and Republicans, who share concerns about the erosion of congressional authority over military actions.
Senators Tim Kaine and Rand Paul have been instrumental in pushing the resolution forward in the Senate. Kaine, a Democrat, has long been an advocate for reining in the executive branch's war powers, arguing that Congress must fulfill its constitutional duty to declare war. Paul, a Republican, shares this view and has been a vocal critic of the expansive use of AUMFs. Their bipartisan collaboration underscores the broad support for the resolution across party lines.
In the House, Representatives Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna have been leading the charge. Massie, a Republican, has been a consistent critic of the executive branch's overreach in military matters. He believes that the resolution is crucial to restoring the balance of power between the branches of government. Khanna, a Democrat, echoes these sentiments and has been a strong advocate for ending the "forever wars" that have been justified by the existing AUMFs. Their efforts have helped to build a coalition of lawmakers who are committed to passing the resolution.
The resolution's text explicitly states that any military action against Iran must be authorized by Congress, except in cases of imminent threat to the United States. This provision is intended to prevent the executive branch from using the existing AUMFs to justify military actions against Iran without congressional approval. The resolution also calls for a comprehensive review of the U.S. military presence in the Middle East, with the goal of reducing the U.S. footprint in the region and transitioning to a more diplomatic approach.
The legislative effort comes at a time when tensions between the U.S. and Iran are at a high point. Recent incidents, including attacks on U.S. forces in Iraq and Syria, have raised concerns about the potential for a broader conflict. Iran's nuclear program has also been a point of contention, with the U.S. and its allies expressing concerns about Iran's compliance with international agreements. The resolution is seen as a way to prevent the escalation of tensions into a full-scale war, by ensuring that any military action against Iran is subject to congressional oversight.
The resolution has faced opposition from some quarters, particularly from those who argue that it could embolden Iran and undermine U.S. national security. Critics argue that the existing AUMFs provide the flexibility needed to respond to threats from Iran and other actors in the region. They contend that repealing these authorizations could tie the hands of the executive branch and leave the U.S. vulnerable to attack.
Despite these concerns, the resolution has gained significant momentum in Congress. The bipartisan support for the measure reflects a growing consensus that the executive branch has overstepped its authority in military matters. The resolution's passage would mark a significant shift in U.S. policy towards Iran and the broader Middle East, signaling a return to a more restrained and deliberative approach to military action.
The legislative process for the resolution is expected to be contentious, with debates likely to focus on the balance between congressional authority and executive flexibility in responding to threats. The resolution's supporters argue that it is essential to uphold the Constitution's separation of powers and ensure that any military action against Iran is subject to democratic oversight. They believe that the resolution will help to prevent the U.S. from being drawn into another protracted conflict in the Middle East.
In conclusion, the resolution to repeal the 2001 and 2002 AUMFs and require congressional authorization for military action against Iran represents a significant effort to reassert Congress's war powers. The bipartisan support for the measure, led by figures such as House Speaker Mike Johnson, Senators Tim Kaine and Rand Paul, and Representatives Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna, underscores the widespread concern about the executive branch's overreach in military matters. The resolution's passage would mark a pivotal moment in U.S. foreign policy, signaling a commitment to a more restrained and deliberative approach to military action in the Middle East.
Read the Full Politico Article at:
https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/06/23/congress/iran-resolution-war-power-trump-johnson-kaine-massie-khanna-00417933
on: Sat, Mar 15th 2025
by: Cryptopolitan
Senate passes GOP spending bill, averting shutdown and sparking democratic rift over Trump
on: Sat, Mar 01st 2025
by: coloradopolitics
Colorado officials react to heated Oval Office meeting between Trump and Zelenskyy
on: Sat, Mar 01st 2025
by: MSN
Utah senators react to contentious Oval Office meeting between Trump and Zelenskyy
on: Thu, Jan 23rd 2025
by: MSN
Senate Advances Pete Hegseth For DOD, Alaska And Maine Republicans Break Ranks
on: Tue, Jun 03rd 2025
by: Yahoo
on: Mon, May 05th 2025
by: KSTP-TV
on: Mon, May 05th 2025
by: KSTP-TV
on: Fri, Mar 14th 2025
by: Bloomberg
Pelosi Comes Out Against Schumer's Government Shutdown Retreat
on: Fri, Mar 14th 2025
by: CNN
Congress averts government shutdown after Senate passes stopgap funding bill
on: Tue, Mar 04th 2025
by: WESA
Marc Fogel, Comperatore family to attend Trump speech to U.S. Congress
on: Sat, Feb 22nd 2025
by: ABC
on: Thu, Feb 20th 2025
by: MSN
Republicans are pursuing separate paths to get Trump's priorities through Congress