N🟁N

Biplab Deb on 'common sense' & ex-CJI Gogoi's absence at House panel meet on judges' post-retirement jobs

The article from ThePrint, titled "Biplab Deb on common sense, ex-CJI Gogoi's absence at House panel meet on judges' post-retirement jobs," delves into several significant issues related to Indian politics, judiciary, and public discourse. The piece is structured around two main topics: the comments made by Biplab Kumar Deb, a former Chief Minister of Tripura, on common sense, and the absence of former Chief Justice of India (CJI) Ranjan Gogoi from a parliamentary panel meeting discussing post-retirement jobs for judges.

Biplab Deb's Comments on Common Sense

Biplab Kumar Deb, known for his controversial statements, recently made headlines with his remarks on common sense. Deb, who has a history of making statements that often stir public debate, suggested that common sense is a rare commodity in today's society. He argued that many people lack the basic understanding and logical reasoning required to navigate everyday life effectively. This statement, while seemingly innocuous, sparked a flurry of reactions across social media and political circles.

Deb's comments were interpreted by some as a critique of the current political and social environment in India, where he believes there is a growing disconnect between the populace and the government. He emphasized that common sense should guide policy-making and public discourse, but lamented that it is often overshadowed by more sensational or divisive issues. Critics, however, saw his remarks as a veiled attack on his political opponents, suggesting that they lack the basic acumen to govern effectively.

The article delves into the broader implications of Deb's statement, exploring how the concept of common sense is perceived in different contexts. It highlights that while common sense is often touted as a universal principle, its application can vary widely depending on cultural, social, and political factors. The piece also touches on the historical use of the term in political rhetoric, noting that leaders across the spectrum have used it to appeal to the public's sense of reason and fairness.

Ex-CJI Ranjan Gogoi's Absence from House Panel Meeting

The second major focus of the article is the absence of former CJI Ranjan Gogoi from a crucial parliamentary panel meeting. The panel, headed by BJP MP Bhupender Yadav, was convened to discuss the contentious issue of post-retirement jobs for judges. Gogoi's absence was particularly noted because he had been nominated to the Rajya Sabha, the upper house of the Indian Parliament, shortly after his retirement from the judiciary.

The article provides a detailed background on the controversy surrounding judges taking up post-retirement positions, especially in government or political roles. It notes that such appointments have long been a point of contention, with critics arguing that they could compromise the independence of the judiciary. The piece also mentions that Gogoi's own appointment to the Rajya Sabha had sparked significant debate, with many questioning the propriety of a former CJI entering politics so soon after retirement.

Gogoi's absence from the meeting was seen by some as a missed opportunity to address these concerns directly. The article speculates on the possible reasons for his non-attendance, suggesting that it could be due to scheduling conflicts or a strategic decision to avoid the controversy. It also discusses the reactions from various quarters, including legal experts, political analysts, and the general public, many of whom expressed disappointment at Gogoi's absence.

The piece further explores the broader implications of judges taking up post-retirement jobs, examining how such moves can impact public trust in the judiciary. It cites examples from other countries where similar issues have been debated, drawing parallels and contrasts with the Indian context. The article also delves into the legal and ethical frameworks governing post-retirement appointments, noting that while there are no explicit bans, there are strong norms and expectations that judges should maintain a certain distance from political roles.

Interplay Between Politics and Judiciary

The article also touches on the interplay between politics and the judiciary, a theme that runs through both main topics. It discusses how political leaders like Biplab Deb often comment on judicial matters, sometimes in ways that blur the lines between the two branches of government. Similarly, the involvement of former judges like Ranjan Gogoi in political roles raises questions about the separation of powers and the potential for conflicts of interest.

The piece highlights the delicate balance that must be maintained to ensure the independence of the judiciary while allowing for the free exchange of ideas and opinions. It notes that while political leaders have a right to comment on judicial matters, they must do so responsibly and without undermining the judiciary's authority. Similarly, judges who enter politics must navigate their new roles carefully to avoid any perception of bias or favoritism.

Public Reaction and Media Coverage

The article also covers the public reaction to both Biplab Deb's comments and Ranjan Gogoi's absence from the panel meeting. It notes that social media platforms were abuzz with discussions on these topics, with users expressing a wide range of opinions. Some supported Deb's views on common sense, while others criticized him for oversimplifying complex issues. Similarly, opinions on Gogoi's absence varied, with some seeing it as a sign of disengagement, while others believed it was a strategic move.

The piece also discusses the role of the media in shaping public discourse on these issues. It notes that while the media has a responsibility to report on such matters, it must do so in a balanced and nuanced manner. The article critiques some media outlets for sensationalizing the stories, suggesting that this can distort public understanding and fuel unnecessary controversy.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the article from ThePrint provides a comprehensive overview of two significant issues in Indian public life: Biplab Deb's comments on common sense and Ranjan Gogoi's absence from a parliamentary panel meeting on judges' post-retirement jobs. It delves into the broader implications of these topics, exploring their impact on politics, the judiciary, and public discourse. The piece also highlights the delicate balance that must be maintained between different branches of government and the role of the media in shaping public opinion. Through its detailed analysis, the article offers valuable insights into the complexities of contemporary Indian society.

Read the Full ThePrint Article at:
[ https://theprint.in/pre-truth/biplab-deb-on-common-sense-ex-cji-gogois-absence-at-house-panel-meet-on-judges-post-retirement-jobs/2674156/ ]