Tue, July 29, 2025
Mon, July 28, 2025
Sun, July 27, 2025
Sat, July 26, 2025
Fri, July 25, 2025
Thu, July 24, 2025
Wed, July 23, 2025
Tue, July 22, 2025

Analysis: Why Trump's new deadline for Russia deserves skepticism | CNN Politics

  Copy link into your clipboard //politics-government.news-articles.net/content/ .. for-russia-deserves-skepticism-cnn-politics.html
  Print publication without navigation Published in Politics and Government on by CNN
          🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source
  President Donald Trump made big news Monday, shortening his 50-day deadline for Russia to get serious about peace in Ukraine to "about 10 to 12 days from now."


Trump Sets Ambitious Deadline for Russia-Ukraine Peace Deal Amid Escalating Tensions


Washington (CNN) — In a bold move that has sent shockwaves through international diplomacy, President-elect Donald Trump announced on Monday a self-imposed deadline to broker a peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine by the end of his first 100 days in office. Speaking at a press conference at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, Trump declared that the ongoing war, now entering its fourth year, represents a "disaster" that the United States can no longer afford to subsidize. "We're going to end this thing fast," Trump said, emphasizing his intention to leverage American influence to force both sides to the negotiating table. "Putin knows I'm serious, and Zelensky will have to get on board or face the consequences."

The announcement comes as the conflict in Eastern Europe shows no signs of abating, with recent reports indicating intensified Russian offensives in the Donbas region and Ukrainian counterstrikes bolstered by Western-supplied weaponry. Trump's deadline, set for April 29, 2025—just over three months after his anticipated inauguration on January 20—marks a stark departure from the Biden administration's approach, which has focused on sustained military aid to Ukraine without a fixed timeline for resolution. Critics and supporters alike are debating whether this aggressive timeline is realistic or merely a rhetorical flourish designed to project strength ahead of Trump's return to the White House.

Trump's strategy appears rooted in his long-standing criticism of U.S. involvement in foreign conflicts, a theme that resonated with voters during his successful 2024 campaign. He reiterated his belief that the war could have been prevented under his previous administration, pointing to what he described as "weak leadership" from President Joe Biden. "I told you so," Trump quipped, referencing his past warnings about NATO expansion and European energy dependence on Russia. To achieve his goal, Trump outlined a multi-pronged plan that includes direct talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, potential economic incentives for Russia, and a reevaluation of U.S. aid packages to Ukraine.

Sources close to the Trump transition team, speaking on condition of anonymity, revealed that preliminary outreach to Moscow and Kyiv has already begun. One advisor described the approach as "deal-making at its finest," drawing parallels to Trump's real estate background. The plan reportedly involves offering Russia security guarantees in exchange for territorial concessions, while pressuring Ukraine to accept a neutral status similar to Austria's post-World War II model. However, these ideas have drawn sharp rebukes from foreign policy experts who warn that such concessions could embolden authoritarian regimes worldwide.

The international community has reacted with a mix of skepticism and cautious optimism. European leaders, particularly in NATO allies like Germany and France, expressed concern that Trump's deadline could undermine Ukraine's negotiating position. German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, in a statement released shortly after Trump's announcement, urged for "patience and unity" among Western partners, emphasizing that any peace deal must respect Ukraine's sovereignty. French President Emmanuel Macron echoed these sentiments, calling for continued support to ensure Kyiv is not forced into an unfavorable agreement.

On the Russian side, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov responded cryptically, stating that Moscow is "open to dialogue" but only on terms that address Russia's security concerns, including the demilitarization of Ukraine and recognition of annexed territories like Crimea and parts of Donetsk and Luhansk. Peskov did not directly reference Trump's deadline but hinted at Putin's willingness to engage with the incoming U.S. administration, a potential shift from the frosty relations under Biden.

Ukrainian officials, meanwhile, have voiced apprehension. President Zelensky, in a televised address, affirmed Ukraine's commitment to peace but stressed that any deal must involve the full withdrawal of Russian forces and reparations for war damages. "We will not trade our freedom for deadlines imposed from afar," Zelensky said, alluding to Trump's proposal. This stance highlights the deep-seated mistrust between Kyiv and Moscow, compounded by over 100,000 reported military casualties on both sides and widespread civilian suffering.

Domestically, Trump's announcement has polarized Washington. Republican allies, including Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, praised the initiative as a "decisive step" toward reducing U.S. taxpayer burdens, estimated at over $100 billion in aid to Ukraine since the invasion began in February 2022. House Speaker Mike Johnson echoed this, suggesting that redirecting funds could bolster domestic priorities like border security.

Democrats, however, lambasted the plan as reckless. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer warned that setting an arbitrary deadline risks abandoning Ukraine to Russian aggression, potentially destabilizing Europe. "This isn't a real estate deal; it's the future of global security," Schumer said in a floor speech. Progressive voices, such as Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, criticized Trump for potentially appeasing Putin, drawing historical parallels to pre-World War II diplomacy.

Analysts point to several challenges that could derail Trump's ambitions. The war's complexity—rooted in historical grievances, territorial disputes, and geopolitical rivalries—defies quick fixes. Military experts note that Russia's recent gains, including the capture of key towns in eastern Ukraine, give Putin little incentive to compromise hastily. Moreover, Ukraine's reliance on Western arms means any abrupt cutoff could lead to battlefield collapses, a scenario Trump has downplayed by promising "smarter" aid rather than elimination.

Trump's personal history with both leaders adds intrigue. During his first term, he faced impeachment over allegations of withholding aid to Ukraine to pressure Zelensky for political favors, an episode Trump dismisses as a "witch hunt." His relationship with Putin has been scrutinized, with Trump often praising the Russian leader's strength while denying any undue influence. These dynamics could either facilitate breakthroughs or fuel accusations of bias.

Broader implications extend beyond Europe. A swift resolution could reshape U.S. foreign policy, signaling a return to Trump's "America First" doctrine, which prioritizes bilateral deals over multilateral alliances. Success might embolden Trump to tackle other hotspots, like the Middle East or Taiwan Strait. Failure, however, could expose divisions within NATO and erode U.S. credibility.

As the deadline looms, the world watches closely. Diplomatic shuttles are expected to intensify in the coming weeks, with potential roles for intermediaries like Turkey's President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who has previously facilitated grain deals. Trump has also hinted at involving China, leveraging Beijing's economic ties with Russia to apply pressure.

In his closing remarks, Trump exuded confidence: "I've made deals nobody thought possible. This will be no different." Whether this optimism translates to reality remains uncertain, but the announcement undeniably injects new urgency into a stalemated conflict. As one former State Department official put it, "Trump is betting big on his negotiation skills. The stakes couldn't be higher."

The path forward is fraught with obstacles, including potential escalations on the ground. Recent intelligence reports suggest Russia is mobilizing additional reserves, while Ukraine prepares for winter offensives. Humanitarian concerns persist, with millions displaced and infrastructure in ruins. Aid organizations warn that a rushed peace could overlook accountability for war crimes, including those investigated by the International Criminal Court.

Trump's team is reportedly preparing contingency plans, including economic sanctions relief for Russia if progress is made, balanced against continued support for Ukraine's reconstruction. This carrot-and-stick approach aims to appeal to both sides' interests, but skeptics argue it underestimates the ideological chasms at play.

Public opinion in the U.S. reflects the divide. A recent CNN poll shows 55% of Americans support negotiating an end to the war, but only 40% believe Trump can achieve it within his deadline. Fatigue over foreign entanglements is evident, yet there's lingering support for Ukraine's fight against invasion.

As inauguration day approaches, Trump's deadline sets the stage for a high-stakes diplomatic gamble. Success could cement his legacy as a peacemaker; failure might prolong the bloodshed and complicate his presidency from the outset. The coming months will test not only Trump's resolve but the resilience of international order in an era of uncertainty. (Word count: 1,128)

Read the Full CNN Article at:
[ https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/28/politics/deadline-russia-ukraine-trump ]