




Thai politics on tenterhooks ahead of new PM vote


🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source



Thai Politics Hang in the Balance Ahead of the New Prime Minister Vote
In the weeks leading up to Thailand’s next parliamentary vote, the nation is at a crossroads. A caretaker government headed by former general‑turned‑politician Prayut Chan‑ocha has steered the country since the 2014 coup that ousted former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra. With the 2023 general election having produced a fractured parliament, the stage is set for a crucial decision that will determine the next civilian leader. The Daily Star’s recent article, “Thai politics teterhooks ahead of new PM vote,” outlines the key players, political dynamics, and the stakes involved in this high‑profile appointment.
1. The Historical Context: From 2014 Coup to 2023 Election
The 2014 coup, which toppled Thaksin’s government, ushered in a military‑led “caretaker” administration. Under the 2017 constitution—drafted largely by the military’s political apparatus—Prayut was elected as a civilian Prime Minister in 2019, albeit with a narrow margin that highlighted the deep divides in Thai society. The constitution also placed the monarchy and the military at the heart of national governance, a legacy that still shapes contemporary politics.
When the 2023 general election was held on 14 March, the country’s electorate was split among a spectrum of parties: Palang Pracharath (the “royal” party backed by the military), the Democrat Party, the opposition Pheu Thai Party (associated with Thaksin’s political legacy), and several smaller factions. None secured an outright majority, forcing parties to negotiate coalition partners. The result was a hung parliament and a prolonged period of uncertainty—one of the most politically fragile moments Thailand has experienced in its post‑coup history.
2. Key Parties and Potential Leaders
Palang Pracharath Party (PPP)
The PPP has been the most influential force behind the scenes, thanks to its military ties. Though it secured a plurality, its numbers were insufficient for a majority. Its leadership, led by former Prime Minister Prayut himself, has publicly signalled willingness to support a coalition that preserves the “constitutional order” while allowing for a civilian leadership that satisfies the demands of a sizable segment of the electorate.
Pheu Thai Party
The Pheu Thai Party, once the dominant force of Thaksin Shinawatra’s political movement, has regained traction in the 2023 election, finishing in the top four. Their platform focuses on social welfare, rural development, and anti‑corruption measures. A leading candidate from this party is Srettha Thavisin—a real‑estate mogul who has maintained a low‑profile public persona but gained significant support in the eastern provinces.
Democrat Party
The Democrat Party, Thailand’s oldest opposition party, traditionally commands a conservative base in the central region. Their platform emphasizes fiscal responsibility and the stability of the monarchy. While they lack the numbers to form a coalition alone, their support could be pivotal in a multi‑party alliance.
Other Factions
The article also cites the influence of smaller parties such as Thai Sang Thai and the “Future Forward” faction (now re‑branded due to legal challenges). These parties hold sway in key constituencies and could act as kingmakers in a coalition that requires a narrow majority.
3. The Coalition Conundrum
The Daily Star article highlights how each party’s coalition strategy reflects broader political ambitions. For instance, the PPP’s willingness to back a civilian candidate who can win the “public’s trust” while ensuring military influence in policymaking. The Pheu Thai Party’s insistence on a platform that prioritizes social programs and an anti‑corruption stance. The Democrat Party’s emphasis on economic stability, which could appeal to the business community and urban voters.
These conflicting priorities mean that coalition talks are not merely about numbers; they are about aligning divergent visions of Thailand’s future. The article quotes political analysts who note that a coalition lacking coherence could risk policy paralysis—a scenario that would severely hamper the country’s recovery from the COVID‑19 pandemic and economic downturns.
4. Public Sentiment and Political Protests
The article references the ongoing public protests that have emerged over the past year. Thousands of demonstrators in Bangkok and other cities have voiced concerns about corruption, economic inequality, and perceived manipulation by the military establishment. The protest slogans, “Democracy First” and “No More Military Rule,” echo the demands that have historically pushed Thailand toward democratic reforms.
The protests are not merely symbolic. They have real political impact, pushing parties to adopt more reformist stances and to offer clearer anti‑corruption commitments. The article cites that the Pheu Thai Party’s promise to overhaul the “state‑owned enterprises” and the PPP’s pledge to “strengthen the transparency of the military budget” are attempts to win over protestors while maintaining their core supporters.
5. The Upcoming Parliamentary Vote
The crux of the article is the looming parliamentary vote to elect the new Prime Minister—a process that could occur as early as 20 June 2023 or as late as the next parliamentary session. The procedures are outlined: the candidate must secure a majority of votes in the first round; if no candidate obtains that majority, a second round will involve the two highest‑scoring candidates. The caretaker PM Prayut will remain in office until a new leader is confirmed.
Because the coalition negotiations are still underway, the date of the vote remains uncertain. Analysts caution that delays could lead to political instability, affecting foreign investment and domestic confidence. The article also warns that the election might see a split vote among the coalition partners, which could derail the process entirely.
6. International Perspective and Economic Implications
The Daily Star article points out that international investors are watching closely. A stable government is essential for Thailand’s ability to attract foreign direct investment, particularly in the manufacturing and technology sectors. The World Bank’s recent report noted that a new government that embraces reform could help Thailand climb the “competitive advantage” ladder, while a fragmented administration might slow economic recovery.
7. Conclusion: A Nation on the Edge
The article closes by summarizing that Thailand is perched on a razor‑thin line. The caretaker government’s continuity is under threat, the coalition talks remain fluid, and public sentiment is a powerful variable that could tilt the balance. The outcome of the upcoming parliamentary vote will not only decide who leads the country but also signal the trajectory of Thai democracy, the balance between military and civilian power, and the country’s commitment to addressing long‑standing economic and social inequities.
For Thai citizens, the stakes are high. For the world, the next Prime Minister’s platform could define the country’s role in regional trade, security alliances, and multilateral cooperation. The world waits, and so does the Thai parliament, as the nation’s future hangs in the balance.
Read the Full The Daily Star Article at:
[ https://www.thedailystar.net/news/world/news/thai-politics-tenterhooks-ahead-new-pm-vote-3978336 ]